Culturally Bound Management Issues in CzechGerman Companies: How to Solve Them - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Culturally Bound Management Issues in CzechGerman Companies: How to Solve Them

Description:

Martin Luke 1, Julia B rger2, Hana indel rov 1 ... e.g. goal setting, motivation, criticising, change management, decision making ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: nob89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Culturally Bound Management Issues in CzechGerman Companies: How to Solve Them


1
Culturally Bound Management Issues in
Czech-German Companies How to Solve Them?
  • Martin Luke1, Julia Bürger2, Hana indelárová1
  • 1 Prague University of Economics, the Czech
    Republic
  • 2 University of Regensburg, Germany
  • November 9, 2005 InterKnow
    Conference Vienna

2
Overview
  • Projects objectives
  • Cultural dimensions CR and G
  • Cultural standards CR and G
  • Methods
  • Research results and suggestions

3
1. Projects objectives
  • To identify the most problematic leadership and
    management areas in German-Czech companies that
    are based on cultural differences.
  • To come with suggestions for improvements in the
    cooperation between Czechs and Germans who work
    together.

4
2. Cultural dimensions CR and G
  • Various cross-cultural researches
  • GLOBE
  • (Koopman et al., 1999)
  • Schwartz Value Survey
  • (Schwartz, 1999)
  • Hofstedes VSM
  • (Hofstede, 1997, Kolman et al., 2003, Thorpe,
    Pavlica, 1996)
  • Trompenaars research
  • (Smith, Dugan, Trompenaars, 1996)

5
2. Cultural dimensions CR and G (2)
  • Fully or partially contradictory findings in many
    values and dimensions. E.g.
  • CR is less future oriented, not according to
    Kolman et al., 2003
  • CR has lower gender differences according GLOBE,
    is slightly more masculine according Kolman et
    al., 2003, and with extreme masculine profile
    according Thorpe and Pavlica, 1996
  • CR has lower power stratification according GLOBE
    and contradictory higher power distance according
    both surveys using VSM (Kolman et al., 2003,
    Thorpe, Pavlica, 1996)
  • CR has lower uncertainty avoidance according
    GLOBE, but slightly higher uncertainty avoidance
    according Kolman et al. (2003), and Thorpe,
    Pavlica (1996)

6
2. Cultural dimensions CR and G (3)
  • Hard to find anything we could rely on and
    recommend for the use in practice to Czechs and
    Germans who work together.

7
3. Cultural standards CR and G (1)
  • Cultural standards refer to certain ways of
    perceiving, thinking, evaluating, and acting
    shared by most members of a culture, i.e. they
    are seen as normal, typical and appropriate
    behaviour. They are used to evaluate and regulate
    own behaviour and behaviour of other people and
    usually are not conscious (Thomas, 1999).

8
3. Cultural standards CR and G (2)
Nový, Schroll-Machl (2003), Schroll-Machl (2001)
9
3. Cultural standards CR and G (3)
  • More useful for Czech German business practice.
  • Lacking empirical evidence from Czech German
    companies (based mainly on research with student
    samples).

10
4. Methods Project flow (1)
  • Definition of management and leadership tasks
  • 29 in total
  • e.g. goal setting, motivation, criticising,
    change management, decision making
  • that might be the areas of conflicts and
    misunderstandings between Czechs and Germans

11
4. Methods Project flow (2)
  • Semi-structured interviews
  • goals
  • to get an overview about the most important
    problems and the attempts to solve them
  • to have a data basis to develop items for a
    questionnaire
  • to collect enough situations and examples to
    create training and selection material afterwards

12
4. Methods Project flow (3)
  • Semi-structured interviews
  • procedures during the interview
  • division of cards with tasks written on them into
    more and less problematic areas
  • selection of 5 the most critical areas in CR-G
    mutual cooperation
  • detailed description of 5 critical incidents
  • recommendations for the solutions
  • evaluation qualitative content analysis

13
4. Methods Project flow (4)
  • Semi-structured interviews
  • sample
  • top and medium level management in Czech-German
    companies
  • 33 interviews in 12 companies in total
  • company size medium-sized to multinationals
  • 14 Czechs and 19 Germans
  • 4 women and 29 men
  • they worked mainly in production companies, half
    of them in personnel, sales or marketing
    departments

14
4. Methods Project flow (5)
  • Questionnaire survey
  • content areas
  • 8 areas with the highest prevalence of examples
    in interviews and a trust issue
  • the content of the individual items was obtained
    from interview statements

15
4. Methods Project flow (6)
  • Questionnaire survey
  • form 1 (descriptions)
  • 6-point Likert scale from 1fully disagree to
    6fully agree
  • 76 items totally
  • Information handover My ... colleagues give me
    important information immediately.
  • Problem solving My ... colleagues like to look
    for perfect solutions while solving work-related
    problems.
  • Relations My ... colleagues try to create a
    friendly work atmosphere.

16
4. Methods Project flow (7)
  • Questionnaire survey
  • form 2 (suggestions)
  • In order to avoid conflicts between Germans and
    Czechs in our company concerning giving and
    accomplishing instructions,
  • it has proven worthwhile
  • I and my colleagues now do the following
  • it must not happen
  • it would help
  • At the end evaluation of mutual cooperation,
    sociodemographic and company data

17
4. Methods Project flow (8)
  • Questionnaire survey
  • procedure and sample
  • emails sent to 540 companies listed in the
    database of DTIHK
  • with a link to the website with the online
    questionnaire
  • N 92 (105 filled by 51 Germans and 54 Czechs),
    13 excluded
  • 71 of participants were men, mostly working for
    medium-sized or large companies in automotive,
    machinery, finance, services, and plastics
    branches

18
5. Results Interview (1)
  • Problematic areas identification
  • from both sides 12 areas, e.g. time management
  • just from the Czech side 3 areas, e.g. personnel
    development
  • just from German side 5 areas, e.g. customer
    orientation
  • not important 9 areas, e.g. coordination

19
5. Results Interview (2)
  • Detailed problematic issues description
  • the same issues perceived in the eyes of the home
    culture, e.g. time management
  • Czech view unnecessary strict long-term planning
  • German view insufficient long-time planning
  • the issues important just for one culture
  • e.g. German view Czechs take critique personally
  • the same causal reasons of the issue attributed
    to the other culture
  • avoidance to take the responsibility for a
    decision

20
5. Results Interview (3)
  • 60 critical incidents
  • Mrs. Kopeckova works as a head of personnel
    department in a big production company. She feels
    it is hard for her to orientate in tons of
    documents and papers Germans have. It seems
    often impossible to find there the piece of
    information she needs the what and why. It
    is hidden because of many papers and check-lists,
    the meaning is often lost to her. Especially when
    she is a foreigner without excellent knowledge of
    German language. She perceives it as a result of
    German inability to tolerate uncertainty.
    Everything needs to be made in detail, everything
    has to be explained in order to have the
    certainty one hundred per cent. As a consequence,
    she and her Czech colleagues stopped to read the
    rules and documents.

21
5. Results Questionnaire (1)
Interesting items
22
5. Results Questionnaire (2)
Scales reliability
23
5. Results Questionnaire (3)
Analysis of variance
p lt .001, p lt .01, p lt .05
24
5. Results Questionnaire (4)
  • German colleagues are evaluated higher in
    detailed and structured instructions and in
    certainty oriented problem solving without regard
    to the nationality of respondents.
  • Only German respondents feel to be badly informed
    by their Czech colleagues.
  • In the areas of decision making and criticism
    both nationalities perceive Germans as more
    willing to take responsibility and make decisions
    and Czechs as more avoiding conflicts, but
    Germans report higher differences.

25
5. Results Suggestions (1)
  • Example Area of Problem solving
  • 13 suggestions from interviews, 204 completions
    of unfinished sentences
  • Czechs should
  • Better structure the information, prepare enough
    documents, be more thorough and have variant
    options prepared.
  • Understand that processes made in details are
    fool-proof, thus more useful e.g. for new
    employees.
  • Improve knowledge of German.
  • Understand that their new solution can be also a
    bad solution. They should discuss and consult it
    before they change it.

26
5. Results Suggestions (2)
  • Germans should
  • Not require keeping all the rules, let more
    autonomy and lessen the control, let there a
    space for Czech creativity.
  • Try to be more flexible in new situations.
  • Act as partners and include more Czech colleagues
    in problem solving.
  • Learn to work with less paper documentation.
  • Improve knowledge of Czech language and
    mentality.
  • Have an expatriate in the Czech Republic who
    mediates between creativity and standardization,
    who can explain, control, discuss issue on place
    and is patient.

27
5. Results Suggestions (3)
  • Both Czechs and Germans should
  • Inform others and communicate
  • Be result oriented
  • Create international teams
  • Clearly define a task
  • Make a decision more objectively
  • Have respect, understanding and positive relations

28
Thank you for your attention!
  • lukesm_at_vse.cz
  • julia.buerger_at_psychologie.uni-regensburg.de
  • sindelh_at_vse.cz
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com