Lm Prevalence and Levels in DeliMeat at Retail - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Lm Prevalence and Levels in DeliMeat at Retail

Description:

Universities of Tennessee, Minnesota, UC Davis, Auburn. and USDA/ARS ... i.e.. Kroger (Ralphs, King Sooper, Smith's, Dillons, QFC, PayLess, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: university104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lm Prevalence and Levels in DeliMeat at Retail


1
Listeria monocytogenes Prevalence and Levels in
Deli-Meat at Retail The NAFSS Study Public
Meeting June 23, 2009 .
Dr. Ann Draughon, Roddy Distinguished
Professor The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Funding National Alliance for Food Safety and
Security, Universities of Tennessee, Minnesota,
UC Davis, Auburn and USDA/ARS
2
Collaborators NAFSS USDA-ARS
ConsultantsAMI, FMI, NTF, NFPA/FPA, USDA-FSIS
Draughon Cliver, Hajmeer Ryser
Oyarzabal
3
Objective 1 - Determine the occurrence of
Listeria monocytogenes in 8015 selected RTE meat
and poultry deli meats sliced at deli counter
and product pre-packaged under USDA inspection
Objective 2 - Determine the levels of Listeria
monocytogenes (LM) in RTE meat and poultry that
is positive for LM
Objectives
4
Types of Samples Targeted
  • Goal 8000 Samples Total
  • (½ retail deli and ½ pre-packed manufacturer)
  • LM Sample Size 125 g (FSIS methodology)
  • Uncured Poultry1000 deli, 1000 pre-pack
  • Cured Poultry 1000 deli, 1000 pre-pack
  • Beef and Pork 2000 deli, 2000 pre-pack
  • Previously Unopened Chub Samples1000

5
Locations for Sample Collection
  • Collect data in locations where foodborne illness
    data are routinely documented by
    FoodNet/PulseNet
  • Choose locations representative of the United
    States (geographic, product availability, age
    other demographics)
  • 3. Choose locations where NAFSS scientist were
    willing to work collaboratively and follow highly
    specific and identical detailed protocols for
    sample collection, handling, analysis and data
    reporting

6
FoodNet Sites
7
Sampling Protocol Information
  • Detailed Collection Sampling Protocol- All labs
    followed exactly the same protocols
  • 450 g Sample (Use 125/250g) in USDA FSIS
    protocol) remainder saved for later study
  • Census data collected for each state/location -
    population percentage calculated for each
    county and collection weighted by county
  • Tennessee Population 5,689,283 (98 counties)
  • Population of Shelby County 897,472
  • Shelby is 15.7 of population x 2000 samples
  • 315 samples collected in Shelby County

8
Sampling Protocol Information
  • Stores in sampling area (yellow pages and
    internet) selected based on random number
    generator. Each store visited only once.
  • Information on Deli Practices Collected with
    Sample
  • From store to lab in lt24h, held at lt4 C
  • Temperature Data Loggers in all coolers
  • Extensive Information Collected With Sample

9
Type of Sample Info Collected
  • Sample Code , Name Type of Product, Store
    Random Code , Purchase Date, County, Inspection
    Code
  • Manufacture date - Sell By Date (date was
    never within 7 days of collection to allow for
    transport and testing)
  • Amount of Product - Size of Sample at least 450g,
  • Amount remaining of deli product before slicing
  • Manufacturing Codes
  • Product Collection Temperature, Ambient
    Temperature
  • Formulation (antimicrobial if label available)
    future study
  • State or Federally inspected  
  • Brand varieties encouraged so that a cross
    section of the market was demonstrated. Brand
    Matching
  • (ie. Retail Case Ready vs Deli) was not possible.
  • Customer Based Deli Practices Score (our system)

10
Type of Sample Info Collected
  • Sample Code , Name Type of Product, Store
    Random Code , Purchase Date, County, Inspection
    Code
  • Manufacture date - Sell By Date (date was
    never within 7 days of collection to allow for
    transport and testing)
  • Amount of Product - Size of Sample at least 450g,
  • Amount remaining of deli product before slicing
  • Manufacturing Codes
  • Product Collection Temperature, Ambient
    Temperature
  • Formulation (antimicrobial if label available)
    future study
  • State or Federally inspected  
  • Brand varieties encouraged so that a cross
    section of the market was demonstrated. Brand
    Matching
  • (ie. Retail Case Ready vs Deli) was not possible.
  • Customer Based Deli Practices Score (our system)

11
Selection of Grocery Stores
  • Type A Stores 75 of samples
    In the Top 100 Retailers

    Examples Wal-Mart, Kroger, Albertsons,
    Safeway, Ahold, Publix, Delhaize, Winn Dixie,
    AP, HEB, Supervalu, Shaws, Eagle, Hy-Vee,
    Pathmark, Raleys, Wegmans, Harris-Teeter, Stater
    Bro, Price Shopper, Whole Foods (including ALL
    store names owned by the corporation i.e..
    Kroger (Ralphs, King Sooper, Smiths, Dillons,
    QFC, PayLess, etc.)
  • Type B Stores 25 of samples
  • Examples Small regional chains, privately or
    family owned, small national chains

12
Analysis Protocol for LM(USDA with additions)
MOX Rapid LM Chrom Agar
125 g sample
UVM Broth
Fraser Broth
Only if Presumptive Positive
Gene Trak Listeria Assay
3 Tube MPN (USDA Protocol)
Horse Blood Overlay Agar
API GeneQuence Genetic Confirmation
STORAGE, PFGE, PCR
13
Product Breakdown for Positive LM
14
LM Positive Deli Style RTE Meat Poultry Samples
-2005-2006
NFPA 03 0.4 2.7 0.89
(2000-2001)
15
Comparison of LM Occurrence in RTE Meat and
Poultry at Retail
Ratio of LM in deli vs. pre-pack
71 81
16
MPN of LM in RTE Meat Poultry 2005-2006
Number of Positive Samples
Level of LM in MPN/g
17
Comparison of MPN of LM in RTE Meat
Poultry-2002 vs. 2005
of Positive Samples
Level of LM in MPN/g
18
Deli Checklist 10 pt Maximum
  • Score of 0, 1or 2 for each section (2no observed
    deficiency)
  • Personnel cleanliness, hairnet, gloves, apron,
    etc.
  • Product clean, orderly, refrigerated, no raw
    meat contact, unprotected contact with surfaces
  • Display Case clean, drip, maintenance, customer
    access, temperature

19
Checklist continued
  • Visible Deli Facilities clean, trash covered,
    food prep in serving area, clutter, floors,
    slicers- set up and cleanliness, food contact
    surfaces cleaned frequently, etc.
  • Premises appear clean, off-odors, rodents, bait
    or insects, standing water, appropriate indoor
    temperature (68 to 78), humidity if available,
    product transport carts

20
Deli Practices Checklist
21
Deli Checklist Scores - All Stores
Number of stores
Deli Checklist Score 0-10 (10excellent)
22
LM Positives Compared to Checklist Scores
Positive Samples
Check-List Score 0-10 (10excellent)
23
Product Temperature at Time of Collection of LM
pos Samples
Samples
Temperature C
NAFSS
24
Refrigeration Storage Times for Deli Meatsa
Source AMI 2001, FDA CFSAN, 2003
25
Approximately How Many Cells Are Consumed in a
Typical Serving that is Positive for LM?
26
Concluding Thoughts
  • LM Prevalence 0.15 pre-packed
  • 1.2 deli sliced
  • LM Prevalence in RTE meat and poultry reduced
    by more than half since 2002
  • LM Levels were reduced compared to 2002
  • Intervention is needed to assist some of the
    smaller grocery deli operators to improve deli
    practices
  • Delis that are attractive and look clean may
    still have issues with LM

27
Acknowledgement and Appreciation Folks Who
Critically Reviewed and Contributed to
Methodology , Experimental Design and Sampling
Protocol
Listeria Research Team Ryser, Oryzabal,
Hajmeer, Cliver USDA-ARS Liaison Jim
Lindsay USDA-FSIS Lynda K., Heather H-F,
Many Formerly NFPA now FPA Jenny Scott American
Meat Institute Randy Huffman Food Marketing
Institute Jill Hollingsworth National Alliance
for Food Safety Security J. Denton
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com