23 Sept 05 EACCWG Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Title: 23 Sept 05 EACCWG Meeting


1
Objective-Task Linkage
EUCOM Strategic Objective 3 Strategic Access
and Freedom of Action are Secure
Strategic Theater Objectives
Strategic Effect 3.1 Host nations support
USEUCOM forward basing strategy
Strategic Theater Effects
MOE 3.1.5 Increased host nation compliance with
support agreements
Measures of Effectiveness
Strategic Task 3.1.4 Establish and maintain MOB,
FOS, CSLs.
Strategic Theater Tasks
-Ability to prevent crisis and rapidly respond
-TSC/Ph O capability in Eastern Europe
Required Capabilities
Assessments
-Measures state of this Effect across DIME
spectrum -IDs IA / mil actions based on trend
analysis, pattern recognition -Focuses influence
activities
Operational/Tactical Objectives/Effects/Tasks
Obj Ground-based presence in E. Europe Eff UR
positioned for rapid response/Ph O support Task
Establish rotational BDE in Bulgaria/Romania
Measures of Performance
1st BDE FOC by xxx
2
Capability Gap Identification
EUCOM Strategic Objective 4 Terrorist Entities
are Defeated and the Environment is Unfavorable
to Terrorism
Strategic Theater Objectives
Strategic Effect 4.2 Partner nations increase
their capability to combat terrorism
Strategic Theater Effects
MOE 4.2.3 Increased percentage of identified
terrorists exploited, captured, or killed by
local efforts with partner nations
Measures of Effectiveness
Strategic Task 4.2.2 Improve CT intelligence
capabilities of partner nations (tied to UJTL /
EUCOM METL)
Strategic Theater Tasks
-Ability to train/equip partner CT
efforts -Ability to provide sufficient ISR -Gap
ISR capability
Required Capabilities
Assessments
-Measures state of this Effect across DIME
spectrum -IDs IA / mil actions based on trend
analysis, pattern recognition -Focuses influence
activities
Operational/Tactical Objectives/Effects/Tasks
OEF-TS Ph II-III Obj/Effects/tasks
Measures of Performance
MARFOR intel training conducted in Country X.
3
Strategic vs. Operational Decision Making
COM DCOM
Strategic Direction
Current Operations
Crisis Response
STIR
CCIR
STIR
STIR
CCIR
CCIR
Effectiveness Assessment
Operational Assessment
MOE
MOE
MOE
IR
MOE
IR
MOE
MOE
IR
IR
IR
IR
IR
IR
IR
Cmdrs Critical Info Requirement (CCIR)
Strategic Info Requirement (STIR)
Information Environment
4
Strategic Information Requirements

• STIR What required US military capabilities are
  absent or significantly degraded?
• Resourcing, DRRS, Dwell time, Forces assigned,
  Force Protection risks
• STIR Where are popular perception, government
  policies, or information conditions counter to US
  objectives?
• Response to US activities, emerging alliances,
  NATO/anti-NATO
• STIR- What adversary capabilities or access
  restrictions pose significant risk of preventing
  USEUCOM success in a military operation?
• SOFA status, Art 98, Chinese influence on policy,
  non-cooperative nations, emerging threats
• STIR- Where are the environmental conditions
  favorable to the growth of terrorism or
  instability?
• Extremist influence, limited host nation
  capability, undergoverned, corruption
• STIR- What existing security conditions threaten
  the favorable international order?
• Frozen conflicts, emerging ethnic/religious
  tensions, political corruption, alliances
• STIR- What are the significant limitations or
  restrictions of key partners to respond to crises
  or cooperate with the US?
• Capability and intent of allies, internal
  political limitations, Russian intimidation
• STIR- What international security or economic
  relationships are potentially antithetical to US
  interests?

5
Effect 4.2 Partner nations increase capability
to combat terrorism
PN Increase CT Capability
W EUROPE SE EUROPE EURASIA N AFRICA W
AFRICA C AFRICA E AFRICA S AFRICA
EUCOM AOR

• Strategic Focus Area
• Address gap between TSC and CT strategies through
  strategic and fiscal alignment (Title 10/22)
• Capability doesnt always translate into national
  political will
• Effective CT programs require more than building
  tactical military capability
• Need to improve shared understanding and
  recognition of evolving terrorist threat
• USEUCOMs primary roles--info sharing with
  partner nations and improving partner nations CT
  capabilities

• Pattern recognition
• Europe capabilities significant, CT cooperation
  improving, but partners are vulnerable
• Balkan CT capability undercut by inter-ethnic
  political and social conflict
• Africa CT capabilities undercut by persistent
  political, economic, and social weaknesses
• Not all partner nations have the same
  understanding of the CT problem

6
ESEP Linkages

Strategic Effectiveness Process
7
Command Integration Process
11 JUL 05
COM Approval
Effects-Based Education, EUCOM Products
Phase I JUN-JUL 05
Effects-Based Addition to Current
Efforts (Reactive)
Phase II AUG 05-MAY 06
Effect-Based Filter of Current Efforts (Proactive)
Phase III JAN 06-DEC 06
Complete Effects-Based Assessment Reporting
Phase IV DEC 06