Title: Writing an IRANCATE SPA Report
1- Writing an IRA/NCATE SPA Report
2IRA Requirements
- Programs must have
- Minimum of 24 credit hours of reading/literacy
courses aligned with IRA Standards at the Reading
Specialist/Literacy Coach level. - 6 credit supervised practicum
- Can be met by one or two courses
- It can include work in schools and/or a
reading/literacy clinic. - Graduate programs that lead to an MSEd. degree or
a Reading Endorsement are eligible to apply as
long as they meet the above requirements.
3NCATE Recognition Decision Criteria
- Full National Recognition
- The program meets Standards, but may have some
Areas for Consideration related to broad
programmatic issues only. - National Recognition with Conditions
- The program generally meets Standards however,
one or more conditions must be remediated within
18 months to gain full national recognition. If a
program does not remediate conditions, the
evaluation will result in Not Nationally
Recognized.
4NCATE Recognition Decision Criteria
- Not Nationally Recognized
- The Standards that are not met are serious and
more than a few in number OR are few in number
but so fundamental that recognition is not
appropriate. - Bottom Line
- Programs that make a good-faith effort and
commitment to align with IRA Standards so that
they generally meet our Standards, but are
evaluated to need some remediation will receive
National Recognition with Conditions.
5For Full IRA/NCATE National Recognition
- Programs must meet
- All 5 Standards at the Reading Specialist/Literacy
Coach level - Minimum of 15 out of 19 elements at the reading
specialist/literacy coach level, with no more
than a single element in any standard not being
met, and - Components within the elements will be holistic
assessed by reviewers. Programs do not need to
address every single element within a component.
Reviewers will evaluate whether institutions
addressed the main features of the element.
6National Recognition with Conditions
- Given to strong programs that meet 15 out of 19
elements at the classroom teacher level, but lack
the required coaching component. - When the assessment is strong but coaching is
lacking, Standards will be noted as Met, but in
the Comments box it will be noted that the
Standard was Met with Conditions. Reviewers will
identify steps the institution needs to take make
sure the Standard at the reading
specialist/literacy socah level is fully met,,
but lack the required coaching component. - Institutions will have 18 months to resubmit
revised report. - Coaching component to support teachers and
paraprofessionals in both the assignment
directions to candidates and the scoring rubric
must be added.
7Focus of the Report
- Assessments and scoring guides that are aligned
with IRA standards at the required reading
specialist/literacy coach level - 6 required assessments with scoring guides
- 2 optional assessments with scoring guides
82003 StandardsParadigm Shift
- Standards 2-5 programs are asked to demonstrate
how candidates support classroom teachers and
paraprofessionals.
9Report Format
- Section I Context
- Section II Standards-Assessment chart
- Section III Required assessments
- Section IV Description of each assessment,
scoring tool and candidate data - Section V
- Use of assessment results to improve candidate
and program performance
10Section I Contextual Highlights
- Describe any state or institutional informational
policies that may influence the application of
IRA Standards. - Describe field and clinical experiences,
including number of hours for field experiences
and number of hours/weeks for supervised practica
and/or internships. - New 2008 NCATE standards require diverse field
placements. - Describe the relationship of the program to the
units conceptual framework. - Describe the program of study that outlines
courses and experiences of all candidates (may be
provided as a catalog attachment).
11Section IIList of Assessments
- List of 6-8 key assessments that are used with
ALL candidates in the program. - Minimum of 6 assessments
- Strong assessments are comprehensive and
generally provide evidence for meeting more than
one standard.
12Section IIIRelationship of Assessment to
Standards
- Assessments directly align with IRA Standards.
- Guides reviewers to focus on the specific
assessments you identify.
13Section IV Evidence for Meeting Standards
- The 6-8 assessments listed in Section II are
described. - Assessments are organized to align with the NCATE
Institutional Report, Standard I. - Content Knowledge
- Pedagogical and professional knowledge, skills
and dispositions - Student Learning
14Section IV Evidence for Meeting Standards
- For each assessment
- Describe assessment and its use in the program.
- Describe how assessment aligns with specific IRA
- standards and elements.
- Brief analysis of the data findings.
- Interpret how data provides evidence for meeting
- standards.
- Attachments
- a) description of assessment tool,
- b) scoring guide (often a rubric), and
- c) candidate data derived from assessment.
15Assessment 1 Content Knowledge (required)
- Data from state licensure tests.
- Must show 80 passage for program completers who
take the State exam. - Institutions must include alignment with IRA
Standards at the reading specialist/literacy
coach level. - If the state does not require an assessment,
institution must still assess content knowledge.
16Assessment 2Content Knowledge (required)
- This assessment must focus on content knowledge
at the reading specialist/literacy coach level. - Include but not limited to IRA Standards 1 5
- Standard One Foundational Knowledge
- Standard Five Professional Development
- Note that Standard Five focuses on the NCATE
requirement for dispositions.
17Assessment 3 Pedagogical and Professional
Knowledge (required)
- Demonstrate candidates can effectively plan
reading or literacy instruction, OR fulfill other
professional responsibilities.
18Assessment 4 Pedagogical and Professional
Knowledge (required)
- Includes but not limited to Standards 2 5.
- Standards include literacy coaching.
- Assessment demonstrate candidates knowledge,
skills, and dispositions are applied effectively
to practice. - Use of assessment instrument to evaluate
internships, practicum, or other clinical
experiences. - If Unit assessment is used, it must be aligned
with IRA standards - Assessment must include literacy coaching.
19Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
- Includes but not limited to Standards 2 5.
- Standards include literacy coaching.
- Assessment of candidates effectiveness on student
learning and provision of supportive learning
environments for student learning. - If Unit assessment is used, it must be aligned
with IRA standards - Assessment must include literacy coaching
20Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
- Effect on student learning
- Examples include student work samples (e.g.,
teacher work sample model) case studies unit
planning, implementing, evaluating.
21Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
- Implications
- Candidates must be involved in developing
extended units of study or case studies that
include - ?Initial assessment to establish needs that lead
to the identification of goals and objectives. - ?Instructional planning to create a sequence of
meaningful engagements that are designed to
achieve goals.
22Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
- ?Implementation of instruction that provides a
sequence of lessons that align with goals and
objectives, and provide for differentiated
instruction to meet the diverse needs of all
learners. - ?Assessment to determine impact on instruction
on student learning (at individual and group
levels) based on student products and/or
performances. - ?Reflection for candidates to determine what
they learned and specific steps they will take
that they believe will increase their
effectiveness.
23Assessment 6 Additional Assessment (required)
- Includes but not limited to Standards 2 5.
- Additional assessment needed to meet IRA
Standards - Standards include literacy coaching.
24Assessments 7 8 Additional Assessment
(optional)
- Additional assessments that demonstrate
- that all standards, and elements, are met.
- IRA STRONGLY recommends submitting 8 assessments
to demonstrate the strengths of a program. -
25Section V Use of Assessment Results for
Candidate and Program Performance
- Evidence that results of assessment have been
analyzed and used by faculty. - Summarize principle findings
- Faculty interpretations of data,
- Changes made to the program based on data, and
- Description of steps taken to use data for both
candidate and program improvement. - Organized around (Unit Standard 1)
- Content Knowledge
- Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge Skills
- Effects on Student Learning and creating
environments that support learning
26Things to Remember
- IRAs Standards are performance-based.
- (Section IV) When interpreting data, the program
is to make the case that their data, in spite of
limitations, indicate that candidates meet
expectations of standards covered by the
assessment.
27Things to Remember
- (Section IV) Dont forget to include the
directions to candidates and the instrument used
for the assessment. - Rubric category labels need to be consistent with
what is expected of candidates who reached
specific stages within the program.
28Things to Remember
- Align assessments with detailed instructions to
candidates with IRA Standards and Elements at the
Reading Specialist/Literacy Coach level. (Include
everything you used to orally communicate to
candidates in class so that reviewers gain a
complete understanding of the requirements for
each assessment.) - Align rubrics and other scoring instruments with
IRA Standards and Elements at the Reading
Specialist/Literacy Coach level.
29Things to Remember
- IRA does not accept GPA or grades from classes
because these do not identify specific
outcome-based assessments. - If you use a generic unit assessment, clearly
indicate how it aligns with IRA standards and
possibly write an addendum to evaluation.
30Things to Remember
- NCATE requirement of scoring guides
- Accurate, consistent, fair, and free from
biasand identify clear distinctions in level of
performance.
31Final Word
- Institutions that have generally strong
assessments and rubrics aligned to IRA Standards
and Specific Elements, but do not have literacy
coaching components may receive National
Recognition with Conditions. - To gain full National Recognition, the
institution has 18 months to add the required
coaching components to assessments and rubrics,
and resubmit. - If the institution does not add the required
coaching components within 18 months, it will be
evaluated as Not Nationally Recognized
32Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse
- Additional information regarding coaching can be
found at the Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse at
www.Literacycoachingonline.org - This clearinghouse is a joint project of the
International Reading Association and the
National Council of Teachers of English.
33IRA Website A Valuable Resource
- IRA Standards, model assessments and rubrics, a
sample of a successful report, and suggested
coaching activities can be found through links at
www.reading.org. Type in NCATE in the Search box.
34Becoming an IRA reviewer
- IRA needs program reviewers. This is a
professional service that is enriching and
fulfilling. - Contact
- Gail Keating
- IRA Headquarters
- GKeating_at_reading.org
35Contact People for Guidance and Assistance
- Gail Keating
- Gkeating_at_reading.org
- Dr. Michael L. Shaw Dr. William E. Smith
- mshaw_at_stac.edu smithw_at_ohio.edu
- Dr. Barbara J. Chesler-
- Buckner Dr. Lynn Romeo
- bchesler_at_coastal.edu lromeo_at_monmouth.edu