Writing an IRANCATE SPA Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Writing an IRANCATE SPA Report

Description:

Institutions must include alignment with IRA Standards at the reading specialist ... IRA does not accept GPA or grades from classes because these do not identify ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:159
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: chesl
Category:
Tags: irancate | spa | ira | report | writing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing an IRANCATE SPA Report


1
  • Writing an IRA/NCATE SPA Report

2
IRA Requirements
  • Programs must have
  • Minimum of 24 credit hours of reading/literacy
    courses aligned with IRA Standards at the Reading
    Specialist/Literacy Coach level.
  • 6 credit supervised practicum
  • Can be met by one or two courses
  • It can include work in schools and/or a
    reading/literacy clinic.
  • Graduate programs that lead to an MSEd. degree or
    a Reading Endorsement are eligible to apply as
    long as they meet the above requirements.

3
NCATE Recognition Decision Criteria
  • Full National Recognition
  • The program meets Standards, but may have some
    Areas for Consideration related to broad
    programmatic issues only.
  • National Recognition with Conditions
  • The program generally meets Standards however,
    one or more conditions must be remediated within
    18 months to gain full national recognition. If a
    program does not remediate conditions, the
    evaluation will result in Not Nationally
    Recognized.

4
NCATE Recognition Decision Criteria
  • Not Nationally Recognized
  • The Standards that are not met are serious and
    more than a few in number OR are few in number
    but so fundamental that recognition is not
    appropriate.
  • Bottom Line
  • Programs that make a good-faith effort and
    commitment to align with IRA Standards so that
    they generally meet our Standards, but are
    evaluated to need some remediation will receive
    National Recognition with Conditions.

5
For Full IRA/NCATE National Recognition
  • Programs must meet
  • All 5 Standards at the Reading Specialist/Literacy
    Coach level
  • Minimum of 15 out of 19 elements at the reading
    specialist/literacy coach level, with no more
    than a single element in any standard not being
    met, and
  • Components within the elements will be holistic
    assessed by reviewers. Programs do not need to
    address every single element within a component.
    Reviewers will evaluate whether institutions
    addressed the main features of the element.

6
National Recognition with Conditions
  • Given to strong programs that meet 15 out of 19
    elements at the classroom teacher level, but lack
    the required coaching component.
  • When the assessment is strong but coaching is
    lacking, Standards will be noted as Met, but in
    the Comments box it will be noted that the
    Standard was Met with Conditions. Reviewers will
    identify steps the institution needs to take make
    sure the Standard at the reading
    specialist/literacy socah level is fully met,,
    but lack the required coaching component.
  • Institutions will have 18 months to resubmit
    revised report.
  • Coaching component to support teachers and
    paraprofessionals in both the assignment
    directions to candidates and the scoring rubric
    must be added.

7
Focus of the Report
  • Assessments and scoring guides that are aligned
    with IRA standards at the required reading
    specialist/literacy coach level
  • 6 required assessments with scoring guides
  • 2 optional assessments with scoring guides

8
2003 StandardsParadigm Shift
  • Standards 2-5 programs are asked to demonstrate
    how candidates support classroom teachers and
    paraprofessionals.

9
Report Format
  • Section I Context
  • Section II Standards-Assessment chart
  • Section III Required assessments
  • Section IV Description of each assessment,
    scoring tool and candidate data
  • Section V
  • Use of assessment results to improve candidate
    and program performance

10
Section I Contextual Highlights
  • Describe any state or institutional informational
    policies that may influence the application of
    IRA Standards.
  • Describe field and clinical experiences,
    including number of hours for field experiences
    and number of hours/weeks for supervised practica
    and/or internships.
  • New 2008 NCATE standards require diverse field
    placements.
  • Describe the relationship of the program to the
    units conceptual framework.
  • Describe the program of study that outlines
    courses and experiences of all candidates (may be
    provided as a catalog attachment).

11
Section IIList of Assessments
  • List of 6-8 key assessments that are used with
    ALL candidates in the program.
  • Minimum of 6 assessments
  • Strong assessments are comprehensive and
    generally provide evidence for meeting more than
    one standard.

12
Section IIIRelationship of Assessment to
Standards
  • Assessments directly align with IRA Standards.
  • Guides reviewers to focus on the specific
    assessments you identify.

13
Section IV Evidence for Meeting Standards
  • The 6-8 assessments listed in Section II are
    described.
  • Assessments are organized to align with the NCATE
    Institutional Report, Standard I.
  • Content Knowledge
  • Pedagogical and professional knowledge, skills
    and dispositions
  • Student Learning

14
Section IV Evidence for Meeting Standards
  • For each assessment
  • Describe assessment and its use in the program.
  • Describe how assessment aligns with specific IRA
  • standards and elements.
  • Brief analysis of the data findings.
  • Interpret how data provides evidence for meeting
  • standards.
  • Attachments
  • a) description of assessment tool,
  • b) scoring guide (often a rubric), and
  • c) candidate data derived from assessment.

15
Assessment 1 Content Knowledge (required)
  • Data from state licensure tests.
  • Must show 80 passage for program completers who
    take the State exam.
  • Institutions must include alignment with IRA
    Standards at the reading specialist/literacy
    coach level.
  • If the state does not require an assessment,
    institution must still assess content knowledge.

16
Assessment 2Content Knowledge (required)
  • This assessment must focus on content knowledge
    at the reading specialist/literacy coach level.
  • Include but not limited to IRA Standards 1 5
  • Standard One Foundational Knowledge
  • Standard Five Professional Development
  • Note that Standard Five focuses on the NCATE
    requirement for dispositions.

17
Assessment 3 Pedagogical and Professional
Knowledge (required)
  • Demonstrate candidates can effectively plan
    reading or literacy instruction, OR fulfill other
    professional responsibilities.

18
Assessment 4 Pedagogical and Professional
Knowledge (required)
  • Includes but not limited to Standards 2 5.
  • Standards include literacy coaching.
  • Assessment demonstrate candidates knowledge,
    skills, and dispositions are applied effectively
    to practice.
  • Use of assessment instrument to evaluate
    internships, practicum, or other clinical
    experiences.
  • If Unit assessment is used, it must be aligned
    with IRA standards
  • Assessment must include literacy coaching.

19
Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
  • Includes but not limited to Standards 2 5.
  • Standards include literacy coaching.
  • Assessment of candidates effectiveness on student
    learning and provision of supportive learning
    environments for student learning.
  • If Unit assessment is used, it must be aligned
    with IRA standards
  • Assessment must include literacy coaching

20
Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
  • Effect on student learning
  • Examples include student work samples (e.g.,
    teacher work sample model) case studies unit
    planning, implementing, evaluating.

21
Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
  • Implications
  • Candidates must be involved in developing
    extended units of study or case studies that
    include
  • ?Initial assessment to establish needs that lead
    to the identification of goals and objectives.
  • ?Instructional planning to create a sequence of
    meaningful engagements that are designed to
    achieve goals.

22
Assessment 5 Effect on Student Learning
(required)
  • ?Implementation of instruction that provides a
    sequence of lessons that align with goals and
    objectives, and provide for differentiated
    instruction to meet the diverse needs of all
    learners.
  • ?Assessment to determine impact on instruction
    on student learning (at individual and group
    levels) based on student products and/or
    performances.
  • ?Reflection for candidates to determine what
    they learned and specific steps they will take
    that they believe will increase their
    effectiveness.

23
Assessment 6 Additional Assessment (required)
  • Includes but not limited to Standards 2 5.
  • Additional assessment needed to meet IRA
    Standards
  • Standards include literacy coaching.

24
Assessments 7 8 Additional Assessment
(optional)
  • Additional assessments that demonstrate
  • that all standards, and elements, are met.
  • IRA STRONGLY recommends submitting 8 assessments
    to demonstrate the strengths of a program.

25
Section V Use of Assessment Results for
Candidate and Program Performance
  • Evidence that results of assessment have been
    analyzed and used by faculty.
  • Summarize principle findings
  • Faculty interpretations of data,
  • Changes made to the program based on data, and
  • Description of steps taken to use data for both
    candidate and program improvement.
  • Organized around (Unit Standard 1)
  • Content Knowledge
  • Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge Skills
  • Effects on Student Learning and creating
    environments that support learning

26
Things to Remember
  • IRAs Standards are performance-based.
  • (Section IV) When interpreting data, the program
    is to make the case that their data, in spite of
    limitations, indicate that candidates meet
    expectations of standards covered by the
    assessment.

27
Things to Remember
  • (Section IV) Dont forget to include the
    directions to candidates and the instrument used
    for the assessment.
  • Rubric category labels need to be consistent with
    what is expected of candidates who reached
    specific stages within the program.

28
Things to Remember
  • Align assessments with detailed instructions to
    candidates with IRA Standards and Elements at the
    Reading Specialist/Literacy Coach level. (Include
    everything you used to orally communicate to
    candidates in class so that reviewers gain a
    complete understanding of the requirements for
    each assessment.)
  • Align rubrics and other scoring instruments with
    IRA Standards and Elements at the Reading
    Specialist/Literacy Coach level.

29
Things to Remember
  • IRA does not accept GPA or grades from classes
    because these do not identify specific
    outcome-based assessments.
  • If you use a generic unit assessment, clearly
    indicate how it aligns with IRA standards and
    possibly write an addendum to evaluation.

30
Things to Remember
  • NCATE requirement of scoring guides
  • Accurate, consistent, fair, and free from
    biasand identify clear distinctions in level of
    performance.

31
Final Word
  • Institutions that have generally strong
    assessments and rubrics aligned to IRA Standards
    and Specific Elements, but do not have literacy
    coaching components may receive National
    Recognition with Conditions.
  • To gain full National Recognition, the
    institution has 18 months to add the required
    coaching components to assessments and rubrics,
    and resubmit.
  • If the institution does not add the required
    coaching components within 18 months, it will be
    evaluated as Not Nationally Recognized

32
Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse
  • Additional information regarding coaching can be
    found at the Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse at
    www.Literacycoachingonline.org
  • This clearinghouse is a joint project of the
    International Reading Association and the
    National Council of Teachers of English.

33
IRA Website A Valuable Resource
  • IRA Standards, model assessments and rubrics, a
    sample of a successful report, and suggested
    coaching activities can be found through links at
    www.reading.org. Type in NCATE in the Search box.

34
Becoming an IRA reviewer
  • IRA needs program reviewers. This is a
    professional service that is enriching and
    fulfilling.
  • Contact
  • Gail Keating
  • IRA Headquarters
  • GKeating_at_reading.org

35
Contact People for Guidance and Assistance
  • Gail Keating
  • Gkeating_at_reading.org
  • Dr. Michael L. Shaw Dr. William E. Smith
  • mshaw_at_stac.edu smithw_at_ohio.edu
  • Dr. Barbara J. Chesler-
  • Buckner Dr. Lynn Romeo
  • bchesler_at_coastal.edu lromeo_at_monmouth.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com