Kampulan ACTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 116
About This Presentation
Title:

Kampulan ACTS

Description:

Field staff mostly inexperienced and new to the NGO sector. ... Risks are insufficiently taken into account. PCM TRAINING SC Sichuan Program ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 117
Provided by: mad80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kampulan ACTS


1
(No Transcript)
2
Introduction
  • Context and objectives of the training
  • Some definitions
  • The Project Cycle at-a-glance
  • Phase 1 Assessment Planning

3
Context of the PCM training
  • Field staff mostly inexperienced and new to the
    NGO sector.
  • Field staff has primary responsibility for
    quality aid delivery towards beneficiaries
  • Save the Chidren is increasingly accountable
    towards donors
  • Opportunity for strenghtening the internal
    coordination of project activities

4
Objective of the PCM training
  • PCM training provides basic understanding of
    project-based activities
  • PCM training provide means and tools for
    increased quality of projects
  • PCM training provides means enabling for stronger
    accountability
  • PCM training underlines the importance of
    coordinated actions during all phases of the
    project-cycle

5
in short
6
Scope of the PCM Training
  • Provide the general knowledge about project
    management
  • Familiarize with key concepts related to project
    management
  • Familiarize with specific vocabulary related to
    project management
  • Not a Master in project management

7
The Laws of Project Management
  • When things are going well, something will go
    wrong.
  • When things cant get any worse, they will.
  • When things appear to be going better you have
    overlooked something.
  • A carelessly planned project will take 3 times
    longer to complete than expected. A carefully
    planned project will only take twice as long.
  • Murphy was an optimist !

8
Murphys Law ?
I never had a slice of bread,Particularly large
and wide,That did not fall upon the floor,And
always on the buttered side.
9
10 Reasons why Projects Fail
  • Unclear objectives
  • Over-ambitious project goals
  • No stakeholder consultation
  • Not linked to programme or policy framework
  • Rigid targets and processes (inflexible)
  • False expectations (optimistic goals to attract
    finance)
  • End abruptly and usually too short term
  • Driven by aid professionals, not locally
    owned
  • Many projects are not relevant to beneficiaries
  • Risks are insufficiently taken into account

10
Definition of Project
  • An undertaking encompassing a set of tasks or
    activities having a definable starting point and
    well defined objectives. Each task has a planned
    due date and assigned resources
  • A structure to complete a specific set of
    deliverables. A project has a specific begin date
    and end date, specific objectives and specific
    resources assigned to perform the work
  •  A time-bound set of tasks directed to an
    overall goal 

11
Key components of the Project
  • Goal identifed objectives
  • Activities geared towards completion of goal
  • Resources assigned to implementation of
    activities
  • Time-bound defined begining and end-date

12
Definition of Program
  •  A collection of projects that are directed
    toward a common goal
  •  A broad framework of goals to be achieved,
    serving as a basis to define and plan specific
    projects 
  •  Umbrella structure established to manage a
    series of related projects. The program does not
    produce any project deliverables

13
Definition of Cycle
  • a periodically repeated sequence of events or
    phases

14
Example
15
Example
16
Example
17
The Laws of Project Management
  • When things are going well, something will go
    wrong.
  • When things cant get any worse, they will.
  • When things appear to be going better you have
    overlooked something.
  • A carelessly planned project will take 3 times
    longer to complete than expected. A carefully
    planned project will only take twice as long.
  • Murphy was an optimist !

18
Murphys Law ?
I never had a slice of bread,Particularly large
and wide,That did not fall upon the floor,And
always on the buttered side.
19
10 Reasons why Projects Fail
  • Unclear objectives
  • Over-ambitious project goals
  • No stakeholder consultation
  • Not linked to programme or policy framework
  • Rigid targets and processes (inflexible)
  • False expectations (optimistic goals to attract
    finance)
  • End abruptly and usually too short term
  • Driven by aid professionals, not locally
    owned
  • Many projects are not relevant to beneficiaries
  • Risks are insufficiently taken into account

20
The phases of the project-cycle
21
Phase 1 Assessment Planning
  • Assessment
  • Project identification
  • Planning
  • Process of setting objectives/goals, strategies,
    procedures and means to meet them

22
Phase 2 Implementation Monitoring
  • Implementation Actual running of the project
  • Monitoring Control of the progressive changes
    brought about by the project.

23
Phase 3 Evaluation
  • Evaluation
  • Assessment of an ongoing or completed project,
    its design, implementation and results.

24
Phase 4 Adaptation
  • Adaptation
  • Refining of the project according to the results
    of the evaluation. May lead discontinuation of
    the project.

25
Phases of the P-C on a time-line
T
P
Planning
Assessment
Evaluation
Adaptation
Implementation Monitoring
26
Break ! 15

27
The Assessment stage
28
  • Assessment
  • Project
  • identification

29
Assessment
  • Assessment as  Need  identification ???
  • Presentation field rapid assessment method
  • Exercise on assessment

30
The concept of NEED
  • The Maslow Pyramid
  • Definitions of NEED
  • Interpretation of NEED

31
The Maslow Pyramid
32
Definitions of NEED
  • Describe a basic human need (Maslow pyramid)
  • Describe the LACK of a basic human need
  • Describe the need for relief assistance or some
    other humanitarian intervention

33
Interpretation of NEED
  • Common mistake Intellectual shortcut leading to
    confusion
  • Needs assessment tend to be combined with the
    formulation of the responses
  • The concept of need as a deficit (lack of) often
    leads to define need in terms of goods and
    services to offer

34
The crux of the matter
  • Need based assessment requires a clear
    distinction between
  • - definition of the problem
  • - formulation of solutions to it

35
Solutions to avoid confusion
  • Risk-based assessment
  • Need identified as the result (the product) of
    actual or imminent threats and vulnerabilities
    (threats to life, health, subsistence and
    security)
  • Demand-based assessment
  • Need identified as the demand from the
    customers regardless of the type of supply that
    can be provided by the assessor.

36
In short..
  • Risk-based assessment
  • supplier perspective
  • Demand-based assessment customer perspective

37
Rights and Needs
  • Need-based and right-based approaches are often
    in opposition
  • Statement about rights and needs are different in
    kind and incompatibles (Speaking different
    languages, comparing apples and pears)
  • - Need refers to what for programming
  • - Right involves a moral and legal claim about
    entitlements and helps to identify
    responsibilities

38
Assessment - Field Assessment
39
Assessment - Exercise
  • Split into 3 workgroups 5
  • Read Case Study 15
  • Produce Assessment report following case study
    30
  • Present results 30

40
Problem Assessment
  • The Problem Tree
  • Helps to establish the cause/effect relation
    between problems

41
Problem Assessment Problem Tree

Effect
CORE PROBLEM
Causes
42
Exercise -gt Build a Problem Tree
  • Split into 3 workgroups 5
  • Read Case Study 5
  • Produce Problem Tree following case study 30
  • Present results 30

43
Objective Assessment
  • The objective Tree
  • Convert the problems into positive achievements
    through means/ends relationships

44
Linking Problems Objectives
Negative
Positive
45
Linking Problems Objectives
  • Just to kick opened doors

Solutions
Changes
46
Objective Assessment The Objective Tree

End
CORE OBJECTIVE
Means
47
Exercise - gt Build a Objective Tree
  • Split into 2 workgroups 5
  • Read Case Study 5
  • Produce Objective Tree following case study 30
  • Present results 30

48
Taking Strategic options
Choices
49
(No Transcript)
50
Assessment Planning The Planning Stage
  • The Planning stage

51
(No Transcript)
52
The logical framework is
  • A blue-print for project planning
  • A framework to articulate logically the content
    of the project
  • A tool and just a tool but
  • the synthesis of the project proposal
  • a requirement from most institutional donors

53
Introducing the Logical Framework
Indicators
Evidences
Objectives
Assumptions
Overall objective
Project purpose
Results

Activities
Pre-conditions
54
Column OBJECTIVE
Objectives
Indicators
Evidences
Assumptions
The broader why for the project.
Overall objective
The desired change that this project will bring
about.
Project purpose
The project deliverables. What the project will
achieve and leave behind
Results

The things that those involved actually do during
the life of the project to produce the outputs
above.
Activities
means
costs
Pre-conditions
55
Objective is
  • GOAL
  • GOAL is identified specifically according to the
    LEVEL of planning

56
Example of Objectives
Objectives
The broader why for the project.
Overall objective
The change that this project will bring about
Project purpose
The project deliverables. What the project will
achieve and leave behind
Results
The things that those involved actually do during
the life of the project to produce the outputs
above.
Activities
57
Column INDICATORS
Indicators
Evidences
Objectives
Assumptions
what is acceptable performance at each level of
the project objectives.
Overall objective
define the expected Project impact which is what
we evaluate.
Project purpose
information we use to monitor the projects
progress.
Results

Activities
activity level indicators
costs
Pre-conditions
QQT - SMART
58
Indicator is
  • BENCHMARK
  • Standard measuring change in a specific
    situation
  • Standard measuring performance of specific
    activities and project
  • Can be
  • Qualitative (based on FACTS)
  • Quantitative (based on FIGURES)
  • Must be SMART
  • S pecific
  • M easurable
  • A ttainable
  • R ealistic
  • T ime-bound

59
Example of Indicators
Indicators
what is acceptable performance at each level of
the project objectives.
define the expected Project impact which is what
we evaluate.
information we use to monitor the projects
progress.
Information we need to monitor the project at
activity level - workplan
QQT - SMART
60
Column EVIDENCES
Indicators
Objectives
Evidences
Assumptions
Where do we go to find the information for
measuring Indicators ??
Overall objective
idem
Project purpose
idem
Results
Activity level Evidences

Activities
means
Pre-conditions
61
Evidence is
  • PROOF
  • Record
  • Tangible or intangible

62
Example of Evidences
Evidences
Where do we go to find the information for
measuring Indicators ??
Idem at purpose level
Idem at result level

Idem at activity level
63
Column ASSUMPTIONS
Indicators
Evidences
Objectives
Assumptions
Overall objective
  What assumptions must hold true for the project
purpose being produced
Project purpose
What external risks might prevent project Outputs
resulting in the planned Purpose
Results

What external risks might prevent project
Activities resulting in the planned Outputs ?
Activities
means
costs
Pre-conditions Anything that the host
organization must do/have in place before project
activities can start
64
Assumption is
  • Proposition or statement accepted as true until
    proven otherwise
  • Help identifying RISKS at an early stage of the
    project
  • Helps managing RISKS under uncertainty
  • Often based on IGW
  • KILLERs assumptions

65
Example of assumptions
Assumptions
  What assumptions must hold true for the project
purpose being produced
What external risks might prevent project outputs
resulting in the planned Purpose
What external risks might prevent project
activities resulting in the planned Outputs ?
Pre-conditions Anything that the host
organization must do/have in place before project
activities can start
66
Break ! 15

67
(No Transcript)
68
  • Your Logical Framework exercise should yield
    something like this

69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
Planning Preparing the logframe
72
Build a Logical Framework - Exercise
  • Split into workgroups 5
  • Produce Logical Framework following case study
    90
  • Present results 30

73
Wrap-up session
  • Highlights of the day
  • Definition of project cycle management
  • 4 phases
  • Assessment and planning
  • Assessment method
  • Problem tree, objective tree, Logical framework
  • Participants feed-back and evaluation

74
(No Transcript)
75
  • Assessment Planning
  • Implementation Monitoring
  • Evaluation
  • Adaptation

76
Implementation and Monitoring
  • The Implementation Stage

77
Implementation
  • In managing the implementation of a project,
    objectives play a key role.
  • Management based on objectives means that
    performance is measured only against achieving
    the objectives.
  • If this is done strictly, it will help to show
    flaws in the project design (impossible
    objectives) or implementation (practical
    constraints) at an early stage, when it is still
    possible to make adjustments.

78
Workplan
  • Workplan based on the logical framework
  • Workplan is divided according to each objective
  • For each objective a responsible person is
    assigned
  • List the activities in chronological order, and
    give more detail than when preparing the logical
    framework.
  • For each objective, list the resources and staff
    required.

79
Workplan
80
Workplan and rollout planning
  • Part of the workplan should be a detailed time
    plan or rollout planning
  • List all the activities from the sheets, and add
    columns for days, weeks or months.

81
Weekly rollout planning
82
Workplan and rollout planning Exercise for a 3
months project
  • Split into 2 workgroups 5
  • Draw a workplan based on the logframe per
    objective, breakdown each activity, the
    resources, the person responsible and the
    deadline 30
  • Do the same with weekly rollout planning. 30
  • Present results 15

83
Implementation and Monitoring
  • The Monitoring stage

84
Definition
  • A continuous and systematic processof
    recording, collecting, measuring, analysing and
    communicating
  • Monitoring is about one thing
  • information

85
Why information ?
86
Principles for project monitoring
  • Focuses on minimal information required for each
    level of responsibility
  • Includes all forms of communication
    verbal,written, formal, informal
  • Uses participatory methods
  • Creates an obligation to act on operational and
    strategic implications of information received

87
Project monitoring tools
  • Platforms of exchange
  • Flash meeting
  • Team/Staff meeting
  • Coordination/ Management team meeting
  • Board meeting
  • Reporting
  • Ad hoc report
  • Situation report
  • Monthly, Quarterly, Annual Report

88
Reporting
  • Ad hoc Report
  • Situation Report
  • Monthly Report
  • Quarterly Report
  • Annual Report

89
Phase 3 Evaluation
90
Phases of the P-C on a time-line
T
P
Planning
Assessment
Evaluation
Adaptation
Implementation Monitoring
91
Definition of Project Evaluation
  • An assessment, as systematic and objective as
    possible, of an ongoing or completed project,
    programme or policy, its design, implementation
    and results.
  • The aim is to determine the relevance and
    fulfilment of objectives, efficiency,
    effectiveness, impact and sustainability.

92
Guiding Principles for Project Evaluation
  • The main purposes of evaluations are learning and
    accountability.
  • Often referred to as an action oriented
    management tool
  • ethical implications. We need to be aware that
    our understandings and beliefs towards what is
    right and what constitutes good quality are the
    evaluation framework itself reflects the ethical
    values the organization holds.

93
Type of Evaluation
  • Project Management Cycle Evaluations
  • Routine evaluations integrated into the project
    management cycle. It makes use of the accumulated
    monitoring information at the project management
    level.
  •  
  • Country Program Evaluations
  • There is no fixed interval or period after which
    such evaluations should take place but there is
    usually a specific reason to initiate this type
    of evaluation. This could be, for example, to
    identify whether or not the organization is
    achieving the objectives as stated in the
    organizational policy.
  • Thematic Evaluations
  • Usually not part of a particular planning cycle,
    contrary to the previous types. In principle they
    can focus on any topic
  • Evaluations of the organisational processes

94
Evaluation Criterion
  • Appropriateness (Relevance)
  • Connectedness
  • Effectiveness
  • Impact
  • Coherence
  • Coverage
  • Efficiency
  • Cost-effectiveness

95
Appropriateness (Relevant)
  • Whether the intervention was appropriate
    according to
  • organization policies
  • perception and/or demands of the target
    population
  • national policies
  • - timeliness of the response

96
2. Connectedness
  • Whether activities of a short-term nature were
    carried out in a context which takes longer-term
    problems into account.
  • Also called LRRD in donor jargon for Links
    between Relief, Rehabilitation and Development.

97
3. Effectiveness
  • Measures the extent to which the project purpose
    was achieved and whether this happened on the
    basis of the activities and inputs of goods and
    services.

98
4. Impact
  • Looks at the wider effects on the target
    population or the country in general, intended or
    unintended, positive and negative, both in the
    short and long term.

99
5. Coherence
  • Whether the activities were carried out with an
    effective division of labour among the actors,
    maximising the comparative advantage of each.
  • Avoiding gaps and overlap, acknowledging the
    responsibilities of all involved
  • The co-ordination of the response(s) is sometimes
    indicated as a separate criterion.

100
6. Coverage
  • The extent to which project activities reached
    the specific target population and/or
  • to what extent the beneficiaries had access to
    the services provided by the project.

101
7. Efficiency
  • Looks at the relation between the verifiable
    outputs -qualitative and quantitative- and the
    inputs (human, material and financial resources)
  • It is mainly used to place a value on the
    implementation process
  • The term managerial efficiency is sometimes used
    to look at for instance the decision making
    process, human resource management, logistics,
    financial management, etc.

102
8. Cost-effectiveness
  • Looks at the relation between costs and effects
    or impact
  • Ex for health projects the intervention in
    terms of costs per patient cured, costs per life
    saved
  • But, it is seldom feasible to do this type
    cost-effectiveness analyses as they are limited
    by the same constraints as described under
    impact.
  • Other methods include describing costs per
    output, like cost per child immunised.

103
Steps for the evaluation process
  • Initiating the evaluation
  • Defining the purpose
  • Defining the scope
  • Defining the key-questions
  • Choosing the methodology
  • Selecting the evaluators
  • Planning the evaluation
  • Defining the budget
  • Follow-up

104
Terms of Reference (ToR) for Project Evaluation
  • 1. Title for the evaluation
  • 2. Responsibilities and lines of communication
  • 3. Context and history
  • 4. Purpose
  • 5. Scope
  • 6. Key questions
  • 7. Methodology
  • 8. Profile of the evaluator(s)
  • 9. Planning
  • 10. Reporting and debriefing

105
Format end of project cycle evaluation report
  • Country X Project (name and cost
    centre)
  • By
  • EoP evaluation report From Till
  •  
  • 1. SUMMARY (3 pages max.)
  •          Short description of the project
    (purpose, target group, project period, budget,
    etc.)
  •          Purpose and approach of the evaluation
  •          Conclusions and recommendations
  •  
  • 2. CONTEXT, NEEDS AND RESPONSE
  • Short description of the project environment
    (based on description of the pre-conditions and
    assumptions) and changes over time.
  •  
  • 3. RESULTS/OUTCOME
  • Project Purpose (PP) describe the main objective
    of the project .
  • PP indicator (Planned result) planned target
    group, quantity, quality, time and place
  • Current Value of PP indicator Achieved
    results
  • Constraints/opportunities (Observations PC)
    Incl. lessons learned
  •  

106
Monitoring - Reviewing - Evaluation
  • MONITORING is done continuously to make sure the
    project is on track
  • REVIEWING is done occasionally to see whether
    each level of objectives leads to the next one
    and whether any changes need to be made to the
    project plans
  • EVALUATION is usually done at the end of the
    project to assess its impact.

107
Monitoring - Reviewing - Evaluation
Balance input/output managerial efficiency
Measure extend of achievement of PP
108
  • Monitoring,
  • Reviewing and
  • Evaluation
  • each assess indicators at different levels in the
    hierarchy of objectives in the logical framework

109
Change
What
What
why
Change
What
110
(No Transcript)
111
(No Transcript)
112
(No Transcript)
113
Budget monitoring
  • Description column insert the labels from the
    project budget (opearation, administration costs
    and transport costs)
  • Budget column insert the budget allocated to
    the project
  • Actual Spending column insert how much money
    has actually been spent
  • The variance difference between the Budget and
    Actual Spending, expressed as a percentage.
  • The variance can be positive or negative. If the
    variance is high for example, above plus or
    minus 10 explain why. If the variance is
    positive, say We have not spent the budget
    because If the variance is negative, say We
    have overspent because

114
New Practice in Monitoring and Evaluation
  • Video ME
  • Video Intro
  • Video Example

115
Phase 4 Adaptation
116
Phase 4 Adapation
  • Well, now just do it !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com