Gulf Port Harbor Construction and ODMDS Designation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Gulf Port Harbor Construction and ODMDS Designation

Description:

Discuss new Gulfport Offshore Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site designation ... Two projects are planned in support of the Gulf Port Harbor Construction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: rsh96
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gulf Port Harbor Construction and ODMDS Designation


1
Gulf Port Harbor Construction and ODMDS
Designation
  • Public Workshop/Hearing
  • March 8, 2007

US Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District
2
Agenda
  • Discuss Gulfport Harbor Federal Navigation
    studies and environmental impacts
  • Discuss new Gulfport Offshore Ocean Dredged
    Material Disposal Site designation
  • Receive comments on the Gulfport Harbor Federal
    Navigation project

3
Gulf Port Harbor Construction and ODMDS
Designation
  • Two projects are planned in support of the Gulf
    Port Harbor Construction
  • Gulfport Harbor Federal Navigation Channel
    widening
  • USACE lead
  • Designation of a new Gulfport Offshore Ocean
    Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS)
  • USEPA lead

4
(No Transcript)
5
Gulfport Harbor Navigation Channel
  • USACE completed a Feasibility Study Report in
    1976
  • Recommendations ( 36deep x 300 wide in
    Mississippi Sound and 38 deep x 400 wide at
    Ship Island Pass)
  • Channel improvements were authorized by Congress
    through the following legislation
  • Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 (Public
    Law 99-88)
  • Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public
    Law 99-662)

6
Gulfport Harbor Navigation Channel
  • USACE prepared a General Reevaluation Report in
    February 2003
  • Fifteen options were considered
  • Five channel depth alternatives (ranging from 36
    feet to 46 feet)
  • Three channel width alternatives (ranging from
    300 feet to 600 feet)
  • Construction of channel improvements could
    generate up to 89 million cubic yards of new
    dredged material

7
(No Transcript)
8
Gulfport Harbor Navigation ChannelProposed
Improvements
9
Gulfport Harbor Navigation ChannelProposed
Improvements
  • Changes in Mississippi Sound
  • Increase width by 80 for approximately 11 miles
  • Dredge 107 acres of undisturbed bottom
  • Changes in Ship Island Pass
  • Increase width by 100 for approximately 10 miles
  • Dredge 97 acres of undisturbed bottom
  • Dredged material disposal requirements
  • Generate slightly more than 3.8 million cubic
    yards

10
Gulfport Federal Navigation Channel Dredging and
Disposal
  • Dredging methodologies
  • Hopper, hydraulic, and mechanical
  • Disposal areas
  • Littoral zone southeast of Cat Island
  • Open disposal areas for maintenance material
  • Proposed New Gulfport Offshore ODMDS for new
    material

11
Regulatory Requirements
  • Compliance with 40 CFR 230
  • Section 404(b)(1) guidelines for specification of
    Disposal Sites for dredged or fill material
  • Special issues include conditions that
  • Cause or contribute (after dilution) to a
    violation of state water quality standards
  • Violate toxic effluent standards
  • Jeopardize continued existence of species listed
    as endangered or threatened under the ESA
  • Violate requirements of the Secretary of Commerce
    for protection of marine sanctuaries

12
Pre-dredging Characterization Studies
  • Characterization studies were performed 2005
  • Guidance documents and standard procedures for
    performing the studies are defined in
  • Inland testing manual
  • Ocean testing manual
  • QA/QC guidance for dredged material evaluations
  • Methods for Collection, Storage, and Manipulation
    of Sediment for Chemical and Toxicological
    Analyses

13
Characterization Studies
  • Collected sediment core samples at 15 locations
    from the harbor area out to Ship Island Pass
  • Collected sediment from 5 to 28 below the
    sediment/water interface
  • Characterized water column conditions during
    survey
  • Performed chemical analyses on water and sediment
    samples
  • Conducted chemical analyses on elutriate samples
  • Conducted toxicity tests on sediment and water
    samples
  • Performed bioaccumulation studies on sediments

14
Characterization Findings
  • Bulk sediment chemistry
  • All results were acceptable based on sediment
    quality criteria and compared closely with
    reference station results
  • Elutriate testing
  • All chemicals detected in elutriate samples were
    at acceptable levels
  • Toxicity testing
  • All water column and sediment testing achieved
    acceptable results based upon EPA acceptance
    criteria
  • Bioaccumulation study
  • All uptake ratios for inorganic and organic
    chemicals were consistent with reference station
    results with the exception of selenium at one
    location near the harbor

15
Environmental Impacts
  • Based on the results of the characterization
    study, the removal and discharge of dredged
    material would not
  • Cause or contribute (after dilution) to a
    violation of state water quality standards
  • Violate toxic effluent standards
  • Jeopardize continued existence of endangered or
    threatened species
  • Violate requirements to protect marine
    sanctuaries

16
Environmental Impacts
  • Other key resource issues reviewed in the EIS
  • Cultural resources
  • Ship Island
  • Ship wrecks
  • Submerged aquatic vegetation
  • Salinity changes
  • Essential fish habitat
  • Commercial and recreational fishing

17
Conclusions in the EIS
  • All impacts would be minor and short term
  • Approximately 204 acres of previously undisturbed
    bottom would be dredged
  • Dredged area overlaps with essential fish habitat
    and habitat of the Gulf sturgeon
  • Gulf sturgeon is a federally listed threatened
    species
  • USACE and the NOAA Fisheries are addressing
    Gulf sturgeon issue

18
Designating an ODMDS
  • The process involves both the USACE and the USEPA
    and is defined in 40 CFR 220-229
  • USACE identifies prospective areas, evaluates
    environmental conditions, and makes
    recommendations
  • USEPA reviews the findings and recommendations
    and designates the site
  • USACE initiated the Gulfport ODMDS site
    identification process in 2003

19
New Gulfport Offshore Ocean Dredged Material
Disposal Site Designation
  • Selection and designation requires
  • Environmental studies of each site, regions
    adjacent to the site, and on historical knowledge
    of the impact of dredged material disposal on
    areas similar to such sites in physical, chemical
    , and biological characteristics
  • USACE developed procedures for completion of
    designation surveys

20
New Gulfport Offshore ODMDS
  • Dredged material disposal site requirements
  • Within 10 miles of the channel entrance
  • Capable of handling up to 89 million cubic yards
    of new dredged material
  • Maintain adequate water column over disposal site

21
USACE Identified Prospective ODMDS Areas
  • Conducted a zone of siting feasibility
  • Based on five general and eleven specific
    screening criteria
  • Navigational restrictions
  • Political boundaries
  • Local of fishing, recreation, shipping, mineral
    extraction
  • Distance to continental shelf
  • Feasibility of surveillance and monitoring
  • Operational and transport costs
  • Other factors (dredging requirements, water
    depth, biological resources)

22
Zone of Siting Feasibility
23
Site Investigation
  • Area B considered best option
  • Two data collection cruises were conducted (March
    and October 2004)
  • Physical, chemical, and biological parameters
    were evaluated
  • Water quality
  • Bathymetry
  • Sediment quality
  • Biota (infauna and epifauna)

24
Simulation Of Disposal Activities
  • Computer modeling was conducted using MPFATE and
    LTFATE
  • Assessment of short-term outcome of multiple
    placements in ODMDS on an annual basis
  • Assessment of long-term trends in dredged
    material mound

25
Findings of Investigation
  • Results of field investigations indicate there
    are no unique physical, chemical, biological
    features in the area
  • No perceived threatened or endangered species or
    cultural resource impacts
  • No indication of water or sediment quality
    issues associated with disposal

26
Findings of Computer Modeling Simulations
  • All dredged material can be accommodated within
    proposed site
  • Sediment movement tends towards the southeast as
    a result of currents and seasonal weather
    patterns

27
New Gulfport Offshore ODMDS
  • USACE prepared a Draft Environmental Impact
    Statement (EIS)
  • EPA is performing a detailed review of the Draft
    EIS prior to release for public comment
  • Report will be updated as necessary and released
    for public comment

28
Gulfport Harbor Federal Navigation Channel
Comment Process
  • Comment period ends April 2, 2007
  • Provide comments tonight that will be captured by
    the court reporter
  • Fill out comment sheets provided at the meeting
    and leave them with us
  • Fill out comment sheet at home and then mail to
    the address on the sheet, fax to the number on
    the sheet, scan and email to the email address
  • Provide written comments via the project web site
  • www.usacegulfportnavigationeis.net
  • Contact Linda Brown, USACE 251-694-3786
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com