OpportunityBased Development: Rethinking Community Development Strategies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

OpportunityBased Development: Rethinking Community Development Strategies

Description:

... entry-level jobs are now located in central cities. ... base disparities in the Twin Cities ... In major central cities the program is used much more often to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: erics2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OpportunityBased Development: Rethinking Community Development Strategies


1
Opportunity-Based Development Rethinking
Community Development Strategies
  • john powell
  • The Kirwan Institute for the
  • Study of Race and Ethnicity
  • October 8, 2003

2
Housing and Opportunity
  • The current paradigm regarding low-income housing
    is failing to provide occupants with access to
    opportunity, wherever that is located in a region
    (the city, the inner-ring, the outer-ring).
  • Housing is a component of a larger set of
    interrelated structures that are both affected by
    housing and have impacts for the attainment of
    safe, stable housing.
  • Affordable housing must be deliberately and
    intelligently connected to high performing
    schools, sustaining employment, necessary
    transportation infrastructure, childcare, and
    institutions that facilitate civic and political
    activity.
  • Where you live is as important as what you live
    in.

3
Housing and Opportunity
  • Is housing affordable?
  • Is the housing located near employment
    opportunities, or does it otherwise help sustain
    employment?
  • Is the housing situated in proximity to
    transportation options?
  • Does the housing support school readiness and
    stability?
  • Does the housing support the health of occupants?
  • Does the housing support the creation of wealth?

4
Source Metropolitan Area Research Corporation
5
Opportunity Jobs
  • In the 1990s, 14 million jobs were created in the
    U.S., but only 13 were created in central
    cities.
  • Only 10 of all entry-level jobs are now located
    in central cities.
  • Because entry-level workers tend to live in the
    city and inner-ring suburbs where housing is more
    affordable, sprawl limits access to opportunity
    and thereby limits the attainment of racial and
    economic equity.
  • Many jobs, and 69 percent of the office space,
    have moved out of the city in Detroit seventy
    percent of all new jobs are in the suburbs.
  • In parts of Oakland County, an affluent county
    just outside of Detroit, there are twice as many
    jobs as people.  Willing workers in many
    lower-income communities in southeast Michigan
    have no way to get to those jobs.

6
Opportunity Jobs
  • The Brookings Institute found Detroit to be the
    second-most decentralized metropolitan area.
    78.05 percent of its employment is located beyond
    the ten-mile ring.
  • Source Job Sprawl Employment Location in U.S.
    Metropolitan Areas (2001), Brookings Institution.

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Opportunity Transportation
  • According to numerous national studies, metro
    Detroit has the worst public transportation of
    any major region in the country forty percent of
    all suburban jobs cannot be reached by public
    transportation.
  • A third of Detroit's residents do not own cars
    and cannot find reliable transportation to the
    suburbs.
  • Those who do have cars are being forced to spend
    an ever-greater portion of their income on them,
    for insurance, gas, parking and repairs.
  • Fifty eight percent of all welfare participants
    in the nation live in central cities.
  • Detroit and its suburbs are losing an estimated
    300 million every year in economic development
    (jobs) because there is no regional mass transit.

Source Metropolitan Organizing Strategy Enabling
Strength, a regional affiliate of the Gamaliel
Foundation 
10
(No Transcript)
11
Opportunity Education
  • Over half of the residents of the Detroit area
    are in communities facing low or slow-growing tax
    bases or social stresses denoted by high poverty,
    low median incomes or slow-growing population.
  • 45 percent of Detroit-area students attended
    school districts exhibiting clear signs of stress
    - either high rates of student poverty,
    significant enrollment growth or serious decline
    - combined with low or moderate revenue
    capacities.

12
Property Tax Base per Household by Municipality,
2000
Source Metropolitan Area Research Corporation
13
City-Suburban Disparity
  • The economic advantages enjoyed by suburban
    regions over the last four decades continue to
    outpace those of cities.
  • The income gap between city and suburban dwellers
    persists increases in median income were twice
    as large in the suburbs than in the cities and
    per capita income increased by about 1,000 more
    for the suburbanite than the city dweller.
  • Cities have over a third more unemployment than
    suburbs.
  • The poverty rate is twice as high in the cities
    than in the suburbs, remaining relatively
    unchanged since 1990.

Source Lewis Mumford Center
14
Detroits City-Suburban Disparity
  • Detroit continues to suffer great disparities
    between the city and suburbs, ranking 48th out of
    the top 50 largest metro areas in 2000.
  • It is possible for the suburbs to prosper while
    the central city declines, but a large disparity
    between cities and suburbs is likely to damage
    the region as a whole in the long run.

Source Lewis Mumford Center
15
Sprawl Percentage Change in Population by Census
Tract, 1990-2000
Source Metropolitan Area Research Corporation
16
Limiting Sprawl Through Smart Growth
  • Smart Growth limits the supply of developable
    land through growth boundaries.
  • More than 100 cities and counties have enacted
    urban growth boundaries. Examples of benefits
    realized include
  • Redirection of resources to the central city in
    the Portland region
  • Opening up of housing opportunity in Montgomery
    County, Maryland
  • Reduction in tax base disparities in the Twin
    Cities
  • Successful results from growth control
    initiatives debunk the claim that sprawl is
    simply a result of market forces, but instead the
    result of choices that are reinforced by
    structures and incentives.

17
Current Housing Paradigm
  • Programs such as the Low Income Housing Tax
    Credit plan have not desegregated our
    neighborhoods or provided occupants access to
    opportunity
  • In a national survey conducted by the Fannie Mae
    Foundation, 39 percent of the central-city
    neighborhoods where LIHTC units were built are at
    least 90 percent nonwhite, and 51 percent are at
    least 80 percent nonwhite.
  • Newman and Schnare (1997) found that LIHTC
    housing is concentrated in low-income
    neighborhoods. In major central cities the
    program is used much more often to provide better
    housing in poor neighborhoods than to provide
    affordable housing in higher-income
    neighborhoods.
  • The low income housing tax credit rent for a two
    bedroom unit in Detroit is 96 percent of the
    fair market rent as of 1990. This means the
    average tenants rent was 547, as compared to
    568.

18
Housing Development by Census Tract, 1970-2000
Source Metropolitan Area Research Corporation
19
Percentage of Housing Affordable to Households
with 80 of the Regional Median Income by
Municipality, 2000
Source Metropolitan Area Research Corporation
20
Incentives for Change
  • We are subsidizing ghettoization and encouraging
    segregation through legal and financial
    incentives.
  • It is time to rethink our processes and
    practices, such as lending policies, to provide
    incentives in line with our goals.
  • One example of such an incentive is
    location-efficient mortgages. These enable lower
    income families to qualify for a greater mortgage
    when the home is located in an access rich
    central location, ultimately linking individuals
    with opportunities.

21
National Initiatives Resources
  • Policy Link (www.policylink.org)
  • Several initiatives aimed at creating and
    increasing economic opportunities for low-income
    neighborhoods such as Saving the Community
    Reinvestment Act.
  • Avocation for equity in the smart growth movement
    through an approach called Regional Equity.
  • Institute on Race and Poverty (http//www1.umn.edu
    /irp/)
  • The Racial Justice Regional Equity Project
    (RJRE) examines the impact urban sprawl has on
    people of color who live in central cities and
    inner-ring suburbs. Through this project, they
    seek to highlight and analyze regional strategies
    in affordable housing, quality education,
    employment opportunities, and other initiatives.

22
Initiatives in Michigan
  • Michigan has several initiatives in place aimed
    at addressing disparities and alleviating
    inequities.
  • Detroit has a strong history of initiatives led
    by faith-based organizations. These organizations
    are increasingly forming allegiances in order to
    combat social injustices, such as MOSES.
  • The business community is also coming together to
    identify and discuss structural issues, which
    perpetuate disparities.
  • Governor Granholm has demonstrated a commitment
    to containing sprawl through Michigans Smart
    Growth Commission, the Land Use Leadership
    Council.
  • Legal initiatives are being enacted in Michigan,
    such as the House bill passed July 2003,
    facilitating the creation of land banks.

23
The Turning Point
  • Instead of focusing on the tipping point, we need
    to better define what neighborhoods require to
    reach the turning point.
  • Pushing development beyond the turning point
    threshold requires an intervention strategy to
    positively transform the neighborhoods physical,
    social, economic, and political environment.

24
Detroit and the Creative Class
  • American demographics are becoming increasingly
    diverse along racial, ethnic, and religious
    lines. The creative class embodies this
    diversity.
  • Much of the population growth in cities comes
    from the movement of the creative class. A key to
    prosperity lies in making Detroit desirable to
    this group.
  • Detroit is currently placed in the bottom ten
    cities in its ability to attract the creative
    class.
  • In order to attract and retain the creative
    class, a city needs to have a strong technology
    base, it needs to be a place that attracts and
    retains talent, and it must embrace diversity.
    Factors such as quality of life for residents are
    considered more important than big ticket
    infrastructure projects, such as sports stadiums.

Source The Rise of the Creative Class, Richard
Florida
25
Looking Forward
  • Scrutinize our process and approach consider the
    structures that are creating and perpetuating
    inequalities.
  • We need transformative thinking to make lasting
    change.
  • Strong initiatives are in place, such as Fix it
    First, the Land Use Planning Act, and Equalized
    School Funding Taxes. Will they be able to
    overcome polarization along racial and
    jurisdictional lines?
  • Start with what we are trying to achieve, and
    work back through the process to see how this can
    be accomplished.

26
Additional Slides
27
Detroit Overview
  • Characteristics of the Community

Source Michigan Metropatterns, a Regional Agenda
for Community and Prosperity in Michigan.
(Amerigis)
28
LIHTC Statistics
Source Updating the Low Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC) Database Projects Placed in
Service Through 1999 U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
29
LIHTC Statistics
Source Updating the Low Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC) Database Projects Placed in
Service Through 2000 U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
30
LIHTC Statistics
  • DDAs (Difficult Development Areas) are
    metropolitan areas or non-metropolitan counties
    in which construction, land, and utility costs
    are high relative to incomes.
  • QCTs (Qualified Census Tracts) are tracts in
    which at least 50 percent of the households have
    incomes less than 60 percent of the area median
    income.


Source Updating the Low Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC) Database Projects Placed in
Service Through 2000 U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
31
Simulated Change in Tax-Base per Household
Resulting From Tax-Base Sharing, 1995-2000
  • Tax-base sharing is a highly effective way to
    narrow fiscal inequalities among communities,
    reduce wasteful competition for tax base and
    share some of the benefits of economic growth.
  • In the following hypothetical tax-base sharing
    program, an overwhelming majority of residents
    would live in communities benefiting from this
    approach.

Source Metropolitan Area Research Corporation
32
Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and
Ethnicity
www.KirwanInstitute.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com