Regression with two predictors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Regression with two predictors

Description:

eM. a. The indirect effect of X on Y through M is a*b. ... M = a0 aX eM. Y = b0 bM c'X eY ... eM. a. 8. G89.2229 Lect 3W. Example of Mediation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: patrick140
Learn more at: https://www.nyu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regression with two predictors


1
G89.2229 Multiple Regression Week 3 (Wednesday)
  • Regression with two predictors
  • Path models
  • Mediation, adjustment, suppression
  • Standard errors of B weights
  • Partial and semi-partial correlations

2
The geometry of E(YX1 X2) b0 b1X1 b2X2
  • E(YX1 X2) b0 b1X1 b2X2 describes a plane.
  • For every change in either X1 or X2, E(YX1 X2)
    changes linearly
  • The distribution of X1 and X2 does not affect the
    form of the plane itself, but it does affect the
    estimates of b0, b1, and b2.
  • MOST IMPORTANTLY, The distribution of X1 and X2
    has a profound effect on how the semipartial
    effects, b0, b1, and b2 relate to bivariate
    correlations.

3
When X1 and X2 are uncorrelated
  • In experiments, we manipulate X1 and X2 so that
    they are balanced, and uncorrelated
  • X1 and X2 are said to be "orthogonal"
  • When X1 and X2 are orthogonal the semipartial
    effects are identical to the bivariate effects of
    X1 or X2 on Y

X2
X1
4
When X1 and X2 are correlated
  • In surveys we usually observe X1 and X2 without
    adjusting their relative frequency
  • As an exception, sometimes we oversample certain
    rare values
  • When X1 and X2 are correlated the semipartial
    effects are different from the bivariate effects
    of X1 or X2 on Y

5
Path models
  • A useful way to think about regression models is
    through path diagrams.
  • Y a bX e

e
b
X
Y
Y B0 B1X1 B2X2 e
6
Mediation Model
  • Suppose we have an association between X and
    YThat we believe is mediated by a variable M

The indirect effect of X on Y through M is ab.
If c' is zero, complete mediation is suggested.
If c' is less than c, then partial mediation is
suggested.
7
Two equations for Mediation Model
  • M a0 aX eM
  • Y b0 bM c'X eY
  • When M in the second is replaced with M in the
    first, we see where the multiplicative path comes
    from.
  • Special path terms
  • M and Y are endogenous
  • X is exogenous

8
Example of Mediation
  • Suppose that X is time spent studying for GRE
    verbal test.
  • Suppose Y is the Verbal GRE score.
  • Suppose M is the number of new vocabulary words
    learned.
  • A pattern of complete mediation would follow from
    the following correlations
  • r(XY) .35
  • r(XM) .70
  • r(MY) .50
  • See Shrout and Bolger (2002) for other examples.

9
Algebraic thinking about semipartial coefficients
  • The OLS estimates of B0, B1 and B2 are those
    numbers which make the sum of the squared E terms
    as small as possible.
  • Some math yields the following
  • The factor to the right is the standardized
    coefficient
  • The numerator of that factor shows the adjustment
    for the second variable.

10
To Test B estimate with Wald statistic
  • Compute standard error of Bi and compute Wald
    Statistic
  • Divide Bi by the square root of this variance
  • Under the null hypothesis, H0Bi0, this
    statistic has a central t distribution on (n-3)
    degrees of freedom
  • The same standard error can be used to compute
    symmetric confidence bound
  • Bj (sej)(t.5a)


11
Suppression
  • Sometimes the semipartial effect for X1 (i.e. b1)
    inY b0 b1X1 b2X2 eis larger in absolute
    magnitude than the bivariate effect inY b0
    b1X1 e
  • This has been called suppression
  • Example
  • X1 is stress
  • Y is distress
  • X2 is coping
  • Classic pattern is when one of the three
    correlations is negative.

12
Spurious effect
  • Consider a path model that resembles the
    mediation model.
  • Suppose that there is a bivariate association
    between X and Y, but when W is considered, the
    semipartial effect b is zero. The original
    association is often said to be "spurious". It
    is explained by the common cause, W.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com