Treatment of Acute Asthma: Beyond BAgonists and Steroids - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Treatment of Acute Asthma: Beyond BAgonists and Steroids

Description:

Dose related toxicities include nausea, vomiting, headache, ... facial warmth, flushing, decrease in BP, sweating, nausea, emesis, CNS effects (including coma) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:220
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: nichola102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Treatment of Acute Asthma: Beyond BAgonists and Steroids


1
Treatment of Acute Asthma Beyond B-Agonists and
Steroids
  • by
  • Nicholas Kallay

2
ED Management of Asthma Exacerbation
Adapted from Expert Panel Report 2 Guidelines
for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Fig
3-11
3
Potential Treatments for Acute Asthma
  • B-agonists
  • Corticosteroids
  • Oxygen
  • Intubation Mechanical Ventilation
  • Methylxanthines
  • Ipratropium Bromide
  • BiPAP
  • Heliox
  • MgSO4 Infusion
  • Mucolytics
  • Chest Physical Therapy
  • Aggressive Hydration
  • Antibiotics
  • Inhalational Anesthetics
  • ECMO
  • Inhalational Furosemide
  • Inhalational MgSO4

4
Methylxanthines (Theophylline)
  • Used for over 50 years to treat asthma
  • Poorly understood mechanism of action
  • Physiologic effects thought to include
    bronchodilation, stimulation of diaphragmatic
    contractility, mucocilliary clearance, and
    possibly some anti-inflammatory effect.
  • Dose related toxicities include nausea, vomiting,
    headache, CNS stimulation, seizure, hematemasis,
    hyperglycemia, and hypokalemia

5
Rossing and Associates
  • 48 patients randomized to 60 min of epinephrine
    SQ, isoproterenol neb, or aminophylline
  • All groups showed improvement, but aminophylline
    significantly less
  • strengths randomized, treatment groups similar
  • weakness not blinded

Effect on FEV1
FEV1 (l)
Time (min)
Adapted from Amer Rev Respir Dis
1980. 122 365-371. Fig 2
6
Carlos and Gustavo Rodrigo
  • 94 patients treated 2 hours with salbutamol MDI,
    hydrocortisone, and aminophylline or placebo
  • No significant difference in PFTs, ED treatment
    times or rate of admission
  • Increased incidence of side effects in
    aminophylline group
  • Strengths randomized, double-blind, placebo
    controlled, adequate sample size

Side Effects Reported at End of Trial
of Patients
Adapted form Chest 1994. 106 1071-1076. Fig 2
7
Corroborating Studies and a Caveat
  • Several other studies, including those by Fanta,
    Murphy, and Siegel have shown similar results
  • Of note these studies were done at presentation
    in the ED
  • Some studies, such as by Huang, suggest benefits
    of theophylline after admission

8
Bottom Line on Methylxanthines
  • Guidelines published by the NIH report that in
    the ED, "theophylline/aminophylline is not
    recommended because it appears to provide no
    additional benefit to optimal inhaled B2-agonist
    therapy and may increase adverse effects.
  • Use after admission remains controversial

9
Ipratropium Bromide
  • A synthetic anticholinergic compound
  • Anticholinergic compounds are known to cause
    bronchodilation
  • Atropine has been used, but often limited due to
    side effects such as tachycardia, dry mouth,
    disturbances of visual accommodation, etc.
  • Ipratropium thought to be relatively free of side
    effects, but with preservation of bronchodilatory
    properties

10
Bryant
  • 28 patients with mild/mod asthma exacerbations
  • Given two drugs at 0 and 90 minutes
  • 1st treatment favored B-agonist only, but 2nd
    treatment and final result favored combination
  • Strengths randomized, controlled, double-blind
  • Weakness small study

Fenoterol vs. Ipratropium
FEV1 (liters)
Time (minutes)
Adapted from Chest 1985. 88 24-29
11
Ward
  • 24 patients given hydrocortisone and salbutamol
    followed by salbutamol or ipratropium two hours
    later
  • Combo group with significant improvement
  • Strengths randomized, controlled, double-blind
  • Weaknesses small study

Salbutamol vs. Ipratropium
PEFR (l/min)
Time (hour)
Adapted from Br J Dis Chest 1985. 79 374-378.
Fig 1
12
Karpel FitzGerald
  • 384 patients
  • Randomized, double-blind
  • Albuterol or albuterol / ipratropium at 0 and 45
    minutes
  • Significantly more responders in combo group at
    45 min, but no significant difference after, or
    in other categories
  • 342 patients
  • Randomized, double-blind
  • Salbutamol or salbutamol / ipratropium at 0 and
    45 minutes
  • All patients given O2 and methylprednisolone
  • No significant differences found between groups

13
Ipratropium Bromide Bottom Line
  • Small, early studies tend to favor its use
  • More recent, larger studies fail to find benefit
  • NIH Guidelines state ipratropium may be
    considered
  • Given ipratropiums relative lack of toxicity, I
    will probably generally use it by shouldnt
    hurt, might help reasoning

14
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (BiPAP)
  • Literature is extensive in treatment of COPD, but
    sparse in treatment of acute asthma
  • Studies using CPAP in asthma have shown it to
    improve symptoms, but not gas exchange

15
BiPAP
  • BiPAP theoretical benefits
  • Decreased work of breathing (and CO2 production)
  • Ameliorating large negative intrapleural
    pressures and accompanying potential for
    hemodynamic compromise
  • Bronchodilation with decreased airway resistance
    (due to splinting airways open with air
    pressure)
  • Improved delivery of inhalational medication
  • Problems include
  • Discomfort with facemask and pressure apparatus
  • Requires very close observation by trained
    personnel

16
Meduri and Colleagues
Results on BiPAP
  • 17 patients with severe asthma hypercarbia
    started on BiPAP (with corticosteroids and
    B-agonist by nebulizer
  • Significant improvement in less than 2 hours
  • Reported well tolerated
  • Weakness uncontrolled case series

Time (hrs)
Adapted from Chest. 1996. 110 767-774. Figs 1
2
17
Pollack and Associates
  • 100 asthmatics given 2 albuterol treatments by
    nebulizer or BiPAP 20 minutes apart
  • Significantly improved PEFR in BiPAP group
  • Strengths moderate sized trial, randomized,
    controlled
  • Weaknesses not blinded, only followed patients
    for brief time

Modes of B-agonist Application
Mean PEFR (l/min)
Adapted from Ann Emerg Med 1995. 26 552-557.
Fig 1
18
BiPAP Bottom Line
  • Little evidence to guide us
  • Existing evidence seems to support its use
  • Given few known risks with an attempt, would
    consider BiPAP in patients refractory to
    conventional therapy (B-agonists and
    corticosteroids), or facing impending intubation

19
Magnesium Sulfate (Infused)
  • Mechanism of action not well understood but may
    inhibit bronchial smooth muscle contraction by
    inhibiting intracellular influx of calcium
  • Side effects are dose and rate related
  • facial warmth, flushing, decrease in BP,
    sweating, nausea, emesis, CNS effects (including
    coma)

20
Green and Rothrock
  • 120 patients received steroids, albuterol
    inhalation and MgSO4 2g iv over 20 minutes
  • No difference in ED treatment time, admissions,
    PEFR, or relapse rates
  • Strengths prospective, randomized, relatively
    large sample size
  • Weaknesses not blinded, ? inclusion COPD, ?
    adequate levels serum Mg achieved

21
Skobeloff and Colleagues
Change In PEFR
  • 38 patients with moderate/severe asthma who
    failed to improve significantly in 90 min
    following treatment with steroids, aminophylline,
    and metaproterenol neb (x2) were given MgSO4 1.2g
    iv over 20 min
  • Modest but significant improvement in PEFR
  • Strengths randomized, placebo controlled,
    double-blind
  • Weaknesses small study, minimally aggressive
    with B-agonist

PEFR, L/min
Time, min
Adapted from JAMA 1989. 2621210-1213. Fig 1
22
Bloch and Associates
  • 135 patients treated with albuterol, steroids,
    MgSO4 2g iv over 20 min
  • MgSO4 only benefited severe subgroup
  • Strength randomized, double-blind, placebo
    controlled
  • Weakness subgroup needed for significance

FEV1 Change in Severe Asthma
Mg
FEV1 ( pred)
Time (minutes)
Adapted from Chest 1995. 107 1576-1581. Fig 1
23
Is bronchodilation dose dependent?
  • Okayama found benefit with 2.5g MgSO4 over 20
    minutes in smaller Asian patients
  • At least 2 case series reporting benefit with
    higher doses MgSO4
  • MgSO4 2g iv over 2 minutes
  • some nausea/vomiting
  • MgSO4 10-20g iv over 1 hour followed by 0.4 g/hr
  • some patients did have mild/mod hypotention

24
Bottom Line on MgSO4
  • Lower doses (2g in 20 min) well tolerated but
    probably only helpful in severe asthma if at all
  • Weak evidence that higher doses (2g in 2 min or
    10-20 g in 1 hour) more effective, but side
    effects may be more of a problem
  • Doses on the order of 2g in 2 min shown to be
    safe in obstetrical literature

25
Heliox
  • As described by Gluck Helium-oxygen mixtures
    improve ventilation by reducing the Reynolds
    number and reducing density dependent resistance.
    Heliums beneficial effects are due to its high
    kinematic viscosity, high binary diffusion
    coefficient for CO2, and high diffusivity.
  • In English Helium flows through airways more
    easily that nitrogen, decreasing work of
    breathing
  • Not thought to directly promote bronchodilation

26
Heliox an Ethereal Treatment
  • Few clinical trials mostly consisting of case
    series, uncontrolled studies, and some pediatric
    literature
  • No definitive study, but seems to be a
    consensus in the literature supporting its use in
    some cases - particularly severe asthma

27
Manthous and Associates
  • 27 patients who presented to ED with acute asthma
    and did not significantly improve with 30 minutes
    treatment using B-agonists and steroids
  • Patients randomized to heliox or room air
  • PP, HR, RR, PEFR, and visual analog dyspnea
    scores measured at 30 min, 15 min into study gas,
    and 15 min after returning to room air
  • Strengths controlled
  • Weaknesses not randomized or blinded, small
    study, heliox group significantly greater
    baseline PP

28
Manthous and Associates
Asthmatic PEFR on Air Heliox
Asthmatic PP on Air Heliox
Pulsus Paradoxus (mmHg)
Peak Flow (lpm)
Time After B-agonist (min)
Time After B-agonist (min)
Adapted from Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995.
151 310-314. Figs1 3
29
Heliox Bottom Line
  • Little available evidence
  • May be helpful (at least in very severe asthma)
    in buying time until other treatments become
    effective
  • Use unlikely to cause harm unless it delays other
    necessary treatment such as B-agonists or
    necessary intubation

30
The Bottom, Bottom Line
  • B-agonists and corticosteroids remain the
    mainstay treatments for asthma exacerbation
  • Methylxanthines not helpful acutely, but may play
    a role subacutely and/or in chronic management
  • Ipratropium Bromide not harmful, may help
  • BiPAP and Heliox may spare a patient from more
    morbid treatments such as intubation
  • MgSO4 is without good evidence of benefit, but
    high doses may be helpful in severe asthma
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com