CS 240A Applied Parallel Computing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CS 240A Applied Parallel Computing

Description:

Thanks to Kathy Yelick and Jim Demmel at UCB ... 'I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.' Thomas Watson, ... climate or galactic evolution. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: johnrg5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CS 240A Applied Parallel Computing


1
CS 240AApplied Parallel Computing
  • John R. Gilbert
  • gilbert_at_cs.ucsb.edu
  • http//www.cs.ucsb.edu/cs240a
  • Thanks to Kathy Yelick and Jim Demmel at UCB for
    use of their slides.

2
Why do we need powerful computers?
3
Tunnel Vision by Experts
  • I think there is a world market for maybe five
    computers.
  • Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943.
  • There is no reason for any individual to have a
    computer in their home
  • Ken Olson, president and founder of Digital
    Equipment Corporation, 1977.
  • 640K of memory ought to be enough for
    anybody.
  • Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft,1981.

Slide source Warfield et al.
4
Simulation The Third Pillar of Science
  • Traditional scientific and engineering paradigm
  • Do theory or paper design.
  • Perform experiments or build system.
  • Limitations
  • Too difficult -- build large wind tunnels.
  • Too expensive -- build a throw-away passenger
    jet.
  • Too slow -- wait for climate or galactic
    evolution.
  • Too dangerous -- weapons, drug design, climate
    experiments.
  • Computational science paradigm
  • Use high performance computer systems to simulate
    the phenomenon.
  • Based on known physical laws and efficient
    numerical methods.

5
Some Challenging Computations
  • Science
  • Global climate modeling
  • Astrophysical modeling
  • Biology genomics protein folding drug design
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Computational Material Sciences and Nanosciences
  • Engineering
  • Crash simulation
  • Semiconductor design
  • Earthquake and structural modeling
  • Computation fluid dynamics (airplane design)
  • Combustion (engine design)
  • Business
  • Financial and economic modeling
  • Transaction processing, web services and search
    engines
  • Defense
  • Nuclear weapons -- test by simulation
  • Cryptography

6
See Mark Adams SC2004 talk slides
  • http//www.columbia.edu/ma2325/SC2004.ppt.htm

7
Units of Measure in HPC
  • High Performance Computing (HPC) units are
  • Flops floating point operations
  • Flop/s floating point operations per second
  • Bytes size of data (double precision floating
    point number is 8)
  • Millions, billions, trillions
  • Mega Mflop/s 106 flop/sec Mbyte 106 byte
  • (also 220 1048576)
  • Giga Gflop/s 109 flop/sec Gbyte 109 byte
  • (also 230 1073741824)
  • Tera Tflop/s 1012 flop/sec Tbyte 1012 byte
  • (also 240 10995211627776)
  • Peta Pflop/s 1015 flop/sec Pbyte 1015 byte
  • (also 250 1125899906842624)
  • Exa Eflop/s 1018 flop/sec Ebyte 1018 byte

8
See TOP 500 List
  • http//www.top500.org/lists/2005/11/basic

9
Why are powerful computers parallel?
10
Technology Trends Microprocessor Capacity
Moores Law
Moores Law transistors/chip doubles every
1.5 years
Gordon Moore (co-founder of Intel) predicted in
1965 that the transistor density of semiconductor
chips would double roughly every 18 months.
Microprocessors have become smaller, denser, and
more powerful.
Slide source Jack Dongarra
11
How fast can a serial computer be?
1 Tflop 1 TB sequential machine
r .3 mm
  • Consider the 1 Tflop sequential machine
  • data must travel some distance, r, to get from
    memory to CPU
  • to get 1 data element per cycle, this means 1012
    times per second at the speed of light, c 3e8
    m/s
  • so r lt c/1012 .3 mm
  • Now put 1 TB of storage in a .3 mm2 area
  • each word occupies 3 Angstroms2, the size of a
    small atom

12
Scaling microprocessors
  • What happens when feature size shrinks by a
    factor of x?
  • Clock rate goes up by x
  • actually a little less
  • Transistors per unit area goes up by x2
  • Die size also tends to increase
  • typically another factor of x
  • Raw computing power of the chip goes up by x4 !
  • of which x3 is devoted either to parallelism or
    locality

13
Automatic Parallelism in Modern Machines
  • Bit level parallelism
  • within floating point operations, etc.
  • Instruction level parallelism
  • multiple instructions execute per clock cycle
  • Memory system parallelism
  • overlap of memory operations with computation
  • OS parallelism
  • multiple jobs run in parallel on commodity SMPs

There are limits to all of these -- for very high
performance, user must identify, schedule and
coordinate parallel tasks
14
Number of transistors per processor chip
15
Number of transistors per processor chip
Instruction-Level Parallelism
Thread-Level Parallelism?
Bit-Level Parallelism
16
A generic parallel architecture
P
P
P
P
M
M
M
M
Interconnection Network
Memory
Where is the memory physically located?
17
Issues in parallel performance
18
Sequential performance is often the hardest issue
in parallel performance!
19
Avoiding data movement Reuse and locality
Conventional Storage Hierarchy
Proc
Proc
Proc
Cache
Cache
Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L3 Cache
L3 Cache
L3 Cache
potential interconnects
Memory
Memory
Memory
  • Large memories are slow, fast memories are small
  • Parallel processors, collectively, have large,
    fast cache
  • the slow accesses to remote data we call
    communication
  • Algorithm should do most work on local data

20
Balancing the Load
  • Load imbalance is the time that some processors
    in the system are idle due to
  • insufficient parallelism (during that phase)
  • unequal size tasks
  • Examples of the latter
  • adapting to interesting parts of a domain
  • tree-structured computations
  • fundamentally unstructured problems
  • Algorithm needs to balance load

21
Finding Enough Parallelism Amdahls Law
  • Suppose only part of an application seems
    parallel
  • Amdahls law
  • Let s be the fraction of work done sequentially,
    so (1-s) is the fraction parallelizable
  • Let P number of processors

Speedup(P) Time(1)/Time(P)
lt 1/(s (1-s)/P) lt 1/s
  • Even if the parallel part speeds up perfectly,
    the sequential part limits overall performance.

22
Issue Measuring parallel performance in theory
  • Sequential complexity measures
  • Execution time
  • Memory
  • Asymptotically, as a function of problem size n
  • Parallel complexity measures
  • Same as above, plus some combination of
  • Number of processors
  • Amount of communication
  • speedup time(1 processor) / time(p
    processors)
  • scaled speedup problem size grows with
    processors
  • and so on

23
Issue Measuring parallel performance in practice
  • Tools (not as good as youd like)
  • Reproducibility (harder than you think)
  • Environment issues (who else is on the
    machine?)
  • Performance is the goal of parallel computing
  • (Will also be a significant part of your homework
    grades)
  • But its really hard to define and measure!

24
Parallel programming languages
25
Parallel programming languages
  • Many have been invented much less consensus
    on best languages than in the sequential world
  • Could have a whole course on them well look at
    a few just for fun (including our research
    project MatlabP)
  • Main languages youll use in the course
  • C with MPI (alternative Fortran with MPI)
  • UPC Universal Parallel C (alternative CAF
    Co-Array Fortran)
  • Lots more on languages Wednesday (Viral)

26
Usability and Productivity
  • See Horst Simon talk
  • See HPCS program
  • Classroom experiment see Markov model slides

27
Course bureacracy
  • Read course web page http//www.cs.ucsb.edu/cs240
    a/homepage.html
  • Google discussion group
  • Account signup
  • CS Department Cluster
  • DataStar, San Diego Supercomputing Center
  • Cray X1, AHPCRC Minneapolis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com