Genomes and chromosomes in flux - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Genomes and chromosomes in flux

Description:

Genes, exons, introns, UTRs, promoters, enhancers, insulators, non-coding RNAs ... Colinearity, duplication rates, expansion/contraction of gene families, gene number ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: nathans8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genomes and chromosomes in flux


1
(No Transcript)
2
Genome organization
  • 11-27-2006

3
Outline
  • Genomic features
  • Reference genome
  • Comparing genomes
  • The epigenome

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Describing a reference genome
  • Genomic features to be identified
  • Genes, exons, introns, UTRs, promoters,
    enhancers, insulators, non-coding RNAs (siRNA,
    miRNA), telomeres, SSRs, centromeres, transposons
    (MITEs, DNA elements, retroelements, helitrons)
  • Meta-analysis
  • Colinearity, duplication rates,
    expansion/contraction of gene families, gene
    number

7
(No Transcript)
8
Comparing genomes within a species
  • List of terms used to compare genomes within a
    species
  • SNP, IDP, CNV (NIPS)
  • How do these apply to marker types such as RFLP,
    CAPS etc

9
Composition of plant genomes
10
Meyers et al., 2001 Genome Res.
11
(No Transcript)
12
Fine scale genome organization in maize
View 1 Widely separated genes with many
retrotransposons between genes
SanMiguel et al., 1998
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Transposons
  • DNA elements
  • Retrotransposons
  • MITEs
  • Helitrons - contains 5' TC and 3' CTRR termini as
    well as two short palindromic sequences near the
    3' terminus that potentially can form a 20-bp
    hairpin

19
Transposable elements
  • Transposable elements are mobile pieces of DNA
  • Generally divided into two classes based on
    mechanism of transposition
  • DNA transposons
  • (Mu, Ac, En/Spm in maize)
  • Compromise 2 of the maize genome
  • move via a DNA intermediate (cut-and-paste)
  • TIRs (Terminal inverted repeats)
  • Retrotransposons
  • Compromise 60 of the maize genome
  • move via a RNA intermediate (copy-and-paste)
  • LTRs (Long terminal repeats)

20
Retrotransposon features
Gypsy-like retroelements
gag
protease
rt
endo
LTR
LTR
Copia-like retroelements
gag
protease
rt
endo
LTR
LTR
  • Retrotransposons must be expressed in order to
    transpose
  • The LTR sequences of retrotransposons act as
    promoters
  • Each retrotransposon contains two promoters

21
Helitrons
  • Recently discovered as a new class of repetitive
    elements in Arabidopsis and C. elegans genome
    sequence
  • Very hard to find bioinformatically
  • Defined by 5 CT, 3 CTTR and secondary structure
    near 3 end
  • Move via rolling circle replication
    (copy-and-paste with DNA intermediate)

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Defining the epigenome
  • Epigenome any information encoded within the
    genome that is not based on sequence
  • Defining epigenome likely includes DNA
    methylation, histone modifications, associated
    RNA, nucleasome arrangement and tertiary
    structure of DNA

25
(No Transcript)
26
Hon RNA PolIV PcG
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Figure 5 Somatic instability of the peloric
phenotype correlates with demethylation of Lcyc.
a, Flowers from a peloric plant showing somatic
instability. Arrows point to extra spurs on the
lateral petals of the semipeloric flowers. The
almost wild-type flower on the left has an extra
dorsal stamen within the flower. b, DNA from
young leaves of wild-type () and peloric (P)
individuals digested and blotted as for Fig. 4b.
The first two lanes corresponds to DNA from
parental individuals lane 3, DNA from an F2
unstable mutant (U) lanes 46, DNA from cuttings
from the unstable plant with peloric (P),
semipeloric (SP) and near wild-type ()
phenotypes. Of the cuttings, only those with near
wild-type phenotype show extensive demethylation
of Lcyc. Based on the relative intensity of the
2.2-kb and 2.4-kb bands, semipelorics appeared to
less heavily methylated than pelorics, consistent
with their less extreme phenotype.
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com