Force Feelin Haptic Integration of IBM Manipulator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Force Feelin Haptic Integration of IBM Manipulator

Description:

Robotic arm modifications and rotational input device (RID) ... Senior Design advisors- Professors Kitts, Quinn, and Hight. Pascal Stang ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: carolr1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Force Feelin Haptic Integration of IBM Manipulator


1
Force Feelin Haptic Integration of IBM
Manipulator
Scott Gunther Adrián Cuadra Matt
Kalkbrenner Krista Hirasuna Colson Griffith
Carol Reiley
Senior Design Conference Interdisciplinary
Session I May 6, 2004
2
Outline
  • Introduction to Haptics
  • Project Goals
  • Project Overview
  • Subsystems
  • Video Demonstration
  • Experiments and Analysis

3
Introduction to Haptics
  • Haptikos - to come into contact with
  • Also known as force feedback
  • Real world uses include
  • Underwater research vessels
  • Hazardous material manipulation
  • Surgical applications

4
Project Goals
  • Develop force feedback system and integrate with
    robotic arm
  • Robotic arm modifications and rotational input
    device (RID)
  • Human Interface Controller (HIC) that conveys
    force to operator
  • Gripper that senses force
  • Experimentation and testing
  • Computer analysis
  • Performance characterization
  • Users experiences

5
System Overview
Arm Gripper Torque
Human Interface Controller (HIC) and Rotational
Input Device (RID)
MOTOR CONTROLLER MICROCONTROLLER
Gripper Force Arm Position
Gripper Force Feedback
6
Human Interface Controller (HIC) and Gripper
7
Design Process Gripper / HIC
  • Researched existing designs
  • Brainstormed new solutions for a robotic gripper
  • Performed Tradeoff Analyses
  • Manufacturability
  • Duality
  • Linearity

Pictures Courtesy of Immersion Corp. and Stanford
University
8
Design Process Gripper / HIC
9
Mechanical Components Gripper / HIC
  • Machined from Al T6-6061
  • Nylon slides decrease friction
  • Motor turns pinion, pinion moves palette via
    attached rack

Pinion
Motor
Rack
Rack Guard
10
Electrical Components Gripper / HIC
  • Encoders detect motor position
  • Force Sensing Resistor (FSR)
  • Range 0-2.5 Newtons
  • Linear assumption
  • Correlation Co. .9043
  • Wilson Current Mirror

Vout
11
Signal Flow Diagram Gripper / HIC
GRIPPER
FSR
Microcontroller
Motor Driver
FSR
Force Control
Position Control
Motor Driver
Encoder
Encoder
Human Interface Controller
12
Robotic Arm and Rotational Input Device (RID)
13
Mechanical Components Robotic Arm/RID
  • Robotic Arm
  • IBM 7545 industrial manipulator donated to SCU
  • Rotational Input Device
  • Machined from polycarbonate
  • Rotates on lazy susan bearing
  • Potentiometer

14
Electrical Components Robotic Arm/RID
  • Arm movement
  • Rotational movement position control
  • Up/Down movement open loop speed control

Arm
Analog Voltage
Current
Micro- Controller
PWM
Motor Controller
HIC
Current
Rotational Potentiometer
PWM
Up/Down Switch
Analog Voltage
Off/On
15
  • Video

16
Experimentation and Analysis
17
Finite Element Analysis
18
Experimental Data Gripper Force Mode
Delay Time td200ms
19
System Block Diagram Robotic Arm
20
Experimental Data Robotic Arm
21
Experimental Data Robotic Arm

SS-Offset T2 deg
90 Rise Time tr3.2s
Delay Time td200ms
22
Usability Survey
  • 15 people of various backgrounds tested the
    system
  • Filled out a survey consisting of 10 questions
  • Results
  • 100 preferred force feedback over position
    control
  • 100 could distinguish between hard and soft
    objects
  • 80 said system was easy to use

23
Improvements
  • Reduce resistance of opening HIC
  • Add a computer interface for the control of the
    system
  • Explore the impact of derivative and integral
    gains on force control
  • Increase range of sensitivity of force sensors

24
Accomplishments
  • Developed a haptic system and integrated it with
    a robotic arm
  • Replaced existing controller with new system
  • Ability to switch between force feedback and
    position control
  • Pioneers of haptics at SCU
  • System to be used as lab tool in
  • SCU robotics
  • Continued by future senior
  • design teams

25
Acknowledgments
  • Senior Design advisors- Professors Kitts, Quinn,
    and Hight
  • Pascal Stang
  • Don Macubbin, Calvin Sellers, Tibor Hites
  • Tim Pargett
  • Deans Fund and Student Leadership Fund
  • Survey Volunteers

Our robot through the eyes of 2nd graders
26
Questions
  • ???

27
Thank You
  • Please, come and feel the difference for
    yourself

28
Appendix 1 FSR Calibration
29
Appendix 2 Gain Plots
30
Appendix 3 Further Analysis
  • Analysis of screws

F
?MA 0 2.226in (F) 0.224in (-252 lbs)
Fmax 25.36 lbs/screw

of screws Fmax 225.36 50.72 lbs Motors
can apply 117 in-oz of torque at 1.41 A and 24
V. 117 in-oz 7.3125
in-lbs
A
B
Gear Radius .5 in Tmax 7.3125 in-lbs
Fmax Tmax/Gear Radius 14.625 lbs
N (Ideal Fmax)/(Real Fmax) N
(50.72)/(14.625) 3.5
Gear
Material Properties Yield Strength 42
kpsi 4-40 screw tensile stress area 0.006
in2 42 x .06 252 lbs max load 252 lbs
31
Appendix 4 Design Process
32
Appendix 4 Design Process
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com