Dont Throw Stones: Historic Preservation and Sustainable Design at the University of Florida - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Dont Throw Stones: Historic Preservation and Sustainable Design at the University of Florida

Description:

Dont Throw Stones: Historic Preservation and Sustainable Design at the University of Florida – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: lsch53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dont Throw Stones: Historic Preservation and Sustainable Design at the University of Florida


1
Dont Throw Stones Historic Preservation and
Sustainable Designat the University of Florida
Dont throw stones at your neighbors if your
own windows are glass. Poor Richards Almanac
1735
Submitted by Professor Susan Tate, AIA, College
of Design Planning and Construction Harold
Barrand, Architect, Associate Director
Physical Plant Division Linda Stevenson, AIA
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
  • The Collegiate Gothic plan presented by
    Architect William Augustus Edwards suggested an
    association with established institutions

5
  • Fall Semester 1906 2 unfinished buildings and
    102 students

6
Historic Preservation is intrinsically a form
of sustainable conservation. The built
environment represents the embodied energy of
past civilizationshistoric preservation is
conservation in every sense of the word. Sharon
Park, FAIA
7
 Rehabilitating and reusing an existing
building, especially one of significant social
and cultural value, is in itself an act of "green
design. Sim Van der Ryn
8
(No Transcript)
9
After the Florida Boom 1925-1944Rudolph
WeaverNew interpretation
10
1925-1944 Rudolf WeaverSignificance
ofCompatibility
11
Post World War II 1944-55Guy FultonContinuity
Scale and Materials
12
(No Transcript)
13
Hub Interdisciplinary Student Project Wins 2005
NCARB National Award
14
(No Transcript)
15
21st Century Compatible Interpretation
16
(No Transcript)
17
The battle at hand Can historic preservation
be squared with environmentally friendly
buildings? The sides appeared evenly matched.
At one point in the meeting, during a discussion
of windows, an attendee proclaimed that
environmentalists could rip the drafty wood
windows out of her historic building. "over her
dead body."
Balance
Prospects for peace appeared dim, .... until the
subject was examined more closely.
18
  • Sustainable design
  • Provide a healthy
  • environment for the inhabitants -
  • Good ventilation
  • Natural lighting
  • Use materials that are biodegradable, recyclable
    and made from renewable resources
  • Consume less energy in new systems than market
    standards
  • Have a recycling plan for waste and water
  • Sustainable Design and Historic Preservation
  • by Sharon C. Park FAIA.
  • Historic buildings
  • Have intrinsic value based on style,
    construction techniques, craftsmanship and
    setting
  • Retain historic character and character defining
    features (i.e., windows)
  • Retain significant historic materials
  • Retain site and landscape features that
    contribute to the setting
  • New additions must be sensitive in scale,
    character and design


19
Governing Standards
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design) Green Building Rating System is a
voluntary, consensus-based national standard
  • The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
    Treatment of Historic Properties were codified in
    the July 12, 1995 Federal Register.
  • 4 methods of treatment
  • Preservation
  • Restoration
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reconstruction


20
Secretary of the Interiors Standards and
Guidelines for Rehabilitation

21
LEED Certification
New construction and major renovation
projects LEED-NC (version 2.2)
  •  Six main categories of certifiable points
  • Sustainable Sites
  • Water Efficiency
  • Energy and Atmosphere
  • Materials and Resources
  • Indoor Environmental Quality
  • Innovation and Design Process
  •  Particularly compatible with historic buildings
  • Sustainable Sites
  • Site Selection
  • Development Density Community Connectivity
  • (Reduced Site Disturbance)
  • 4) Materials and Resources
  • Building Reuse
  • Materials Reuse
  • Indoor Environmental Quality
  • Increased Ventilation
  • Daylight Views


22
Smathers Library Library East
  • Constructed 1927
  • East Wing Addition 1931
  • North Wing Stacks Addition - 1946

23
Maintenance Issues
  • Wood Frames Steel Sashes were deteriorated
  • Broken Operators
  • Cracked Glass Panes
  • Conditioned air leaking out
  • Air infiltration
  • Reading Room now used for archival items

24
Project Approach
  • Survey all windows to
  • Identify character defining features
  • Document condition of frames, glass, sash
    operators.
  • Environmental Survey
  • Asbestos
  • Lead paint
  • Architectural Restoration Documents
  • Restore Windows Keep Library Functional

25
Removal
  • Abatement of asbestos and lead paint Windows were
    removed.
  • Openings were covered with plywood.
  • Sealed to prevent water air intrusion.
  • Library operational

26
  • Each window frame was identified.

27
  • Rusted steel frames to be cleaned, repaired and
    primed.
  • Controlled environment
  • of the shop.
  • Operators were brass and steel.

28
  • Final removal of lead and asbestos under
    controlled conditions
  • Window frames to be restored

29
  • Window frames under restoration

30
  • Paint was removed to bare wood.
  • Rotted wood was replaced.

31
  • Existing glass
  • Glass prepped for
  • application of UV film.

32
  • Re-installation of window frames and sashes.

33
Restored windows
  • Glazing is a mixture of old and new textured
    glass
  • UV film applied to inside surface of glass

34
(No Transcript)
35
Tigert Hall
  • Constructed 1950
  • Administration Bldg.
  • Contributing Bldg. in the Historical District

36
  • Existing Conditions
  • Air sound intrusion
  • Preservation of interior materials (marble)

37
  • Multiple interior sill conditions

38
  • Average air loss per window was 44 CFM.

39
Project Approach
Survey all windows to Identify character
defining features Document condition of frames,
glass, sash operators. Environmental
Survey Asbestos Lead paint Architectural
Restoration Documents Restore Windows Keep
Building Operational
40
Checking Window Sizes
  • Each window was measured and categorized so that
    replacement units would fit snugly in specific
    openings.

41
Checking Fit of Components
  • Samples were brought in to assure fit over
    existing frames.
  • Original window frames were retained to avoid
    damage to tile and marble window sills and
    plaster jambs and heads.

42
Mockup Installation
  • Fit, appearance and compatibility are checked.
  • New window near (below) existing.

43
Window Installation
  • Building occupied through installation
  • Assembly Trailer on site
  • Windows were not removed unless they could be
    replaced the same day.
  • Window being transported from the assembly
    trailer to its scheduled opening.
  • Openings ready for windows.

44
  • Consideration had to be given to ceiling
    conditions, furniture, scheduling to accommodate
    occupants, etc.

45
New Completed Windows
Benefits
  • External Noise Reduction
  • Air infiltration minimal
  • Ultraviolet reduction
  • Heat gain reduction
  • Water infiltration eliminated
  • Low E glass

46
Lobby Area
  • Installation did not damage irreplaceable marble

47
(No Transcript)
48
Finished Product
49
Weve Come a Long Way
Historic Preservation and Sustainability
Circa 1959
Present
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com