Title: Case Study Richard Jewell and the Olympic Bombing
1Case Study Richard Jewell and the Olympic Bombing
- Adapted from a study by Ron Ostrow for the
Project for Excellence in Journalism - http//www.journalism.org/node/1791
2Centennial Olympic Park, Atlanta
327-28 July 1996
- 12.58 a.m Anonymous call to police saying
there is a bomb in Centennial Park. You have 30
minutes. - Richard Jewell, a 33 year old security guard at
the tower notices a backpack lying on the ground,
alerts others and helps evacuate people - 1.20 a.m Pipe bomb explodes near a light tower.
Two people die, 112 injured - Jewell is hailed as a hero for noticing the bomb
and helping to save lives. He is interviewed in
all the major media.
4July 28-29
- In the afternoon, the FBI receives information
about Jewell - -a former boss rings the FBI and says Jewell was
not very reliable and might have been involved - -he had been arrested in 1990 for impersonating a
policeman - -he had been fired from two other police jobs
- -FBI experts believed he fit the psychological
profile of a person who might create such an
incident in order to emerge a hero - -By the end of July 29, Jewell had emerged as the
principal, though not only suspect
5(No Transcript)
6At the Atlanta Journal Constitution, July 29
- Kathy Scruggs, an experienced police reporter, is
told by a source in the Atlanta police
department that investigators are looking at
Jewell as a suspect - Source tells her she cannot use the story, as it
might endanger the investigation. - Scruggs agrees, but says that if she can get the
same story from other sources, she will use it.
7At the AJC office
- Scruggs tells her editor I have good news and
bad news. I know who they are looking at, but we
cant use it. - Her editor agrees, and said she would have to
confirm the story through other sources
8July 30
- Scruggs is told by another source in the Atlanta
police department that investigators were looking
at Jewell- says everybody in the department
knows about it - Scruggs told her editors that since she had other
sources saying that Jewell was a suspect, they
should report it. - Another reporter, Ron Martz, was told by his
federal law enforcement sources that the story
was on the right track
9- The newspaper also sent an intern to Jewells
apartment complex there she saw men in plain
clothes watching the apartment with binoculars. - The intern knocked at Jewells door, but he would
not open
10The view from the newsroom
- This was a big story, and the Atlanta Journal
Constitution reporters appeared to have a scoop
on who might have done it - With the eyes of the world on Atlanta, every
major news organization in the world was
reporting on the story
11What information did the reporters have?
- Four different sources had indicated that Jewell
was a suspect - Jewell had a history of trouble in other places
he had worked at-reporters were sent to check out
his past - Sources had said he fit the profile of a lone
bomber - His apartment was under surveillance, and he had
refused to talk to reporters
12Some issues that the editors thought about.
- No one was willing to go on record saying that
Jewell was a suspect - Were the law enforcement agencies using the press
to sweat out a suspect? - But Scruggs and Martz were both experienced, and
trusted the sources who were giving them
information. -
13An additional step that the managing editor took
- He got a reporter to read the story draft out to
a federal law enforcement source and asked
whether there was anything inaccurate in the
story. The source commented that the headline was
a bit strong, but that there was nothing
inaccurate in the story. - The source was also asked whether publishing the
story would hinder investigation, and replied
that it would not
14- The newspaper decided to run the story as the
lead on the afternoon of July 30 - Television stations quickly followed it up, and
soon everyone knew that Richard Jewell was the
prime suspect in this case. - TV crews and reporters were parked outside his
apartment, and the story was on every national
news outlet.
15Other big news organizations ran their own stories
- CNN ran the story based on their own sources. My
source told me, this is the guy,and Ive never
known my source to be wrong - NBCs Tom Brokaw They probably have enough to
arrest him right now, probably enough to
prosecute him.but there are still some holes in
the case.
16July 31-Day 2
- Jewell is questioned by the FBI for two hours and
released, without being arrested or charged. - Reporters get his response for the first time,
and he flatly denies planting the bomb - Media report this, but the main focus of most
stories continues to be that he was the main
suspect, given his character and earlier
background.
17Some media comments
- Talk show host Michael Lebron on WABC AM radio,
New York described Jewell as a typical rent a
cop freako security guard loser who always wanted
to be somebody and who drives around in a used
police cara little loser
18August 10
- Evidence emerges that Jewell could not have made
the 911 phone call at the time the call was
made, he was talking to security guards. - FBI agents apparently knew about this.
- Jewell had still not been publicly identified as
a suspect.
19August 23
- An ABC news poll showed that the majority of
Americans though that Jewell had been treated
unfairly by the media.
20October 26
- US prosecutors publicly clear Jewell of any
involvement in the bomb case, saying he is not
a target of ..the investigation
21What Jewell said
- "I am not the Olympic Park bomber. I am a man who
has lived 88 days afraid of being arrested for a
crime I did not commit. - In its rush for the headline that the hero was
the bomber, the media cared nothing for my
feelings as a human being
22- Your cameras trained on my mother and me. Your
cameras and the FBI followed my every move. I
felt like a hunted animal, followed constantly,
waiting to be killed. The media said I fit the
profile of a lone bomber. That was a lie
23Jewell sued a number of news outlets for libel
- He won undisclosed amounts from both CNN and NBC
news and the New York Post and ABC News - Jewell had a suit pending against the Atlanta
Journal Constitution
24The AJC defends its reporting
- Kathy Scruggs We have not done anything wrong,
as everything we wrote has been accurate - We didnt say he was guilty.
- They had four sources for their story
- Intern saw police officers watching Jewells
apartment - Jewell was in the public eye people had a right
to know if he was dangerous
25Questions that reporters did not focus enough on
- What was the FBI evidence based on?
- Why did no one from the police or FBI go on the
record? - Why had Jewell not been arrested?
26Some issues
- Is accuracy truth? If not how much verification
is required before publication? - Is it right to name some one just on suspicion,
or should you wait till they are formally
charged? - How do you balance the public right to know, with
the presumption of innocence? (the principle that
a person is innocent until proven guilty)
27Epilogue
- October 14 1998, Eric Rudolph, a man who had
previously been charged with bombing an abortion
clinic in Alabama, and was also accused of
bombing a gay bar in Atlanta, was charged with
the bombing.
28Kathy Scruggs
- In September 2001, Kathy Scruggs, aged 42, was
found dead in her apartment near Atlanta. She had
been in poor health for the past year, and
apparently under a great deal of stress because
of the libel case against her. - Richard Jewell had filed the libel case demanding
to know the police sources who had leaked his
name. Scruggs refused to reveal them.
29August 30, 2007, The New York Times Reports
Richard Jewell, 44, Hero of Atlanta Attack, Dies
30 I think everybody in journalism ought to be
ashamed of themselves today.Not at the very
beginning but after that period of time when
they went with a story without any additional
fresh information. They were hyping news. They
were trying to get little bits of information
and blowing it into a sensation, and I think
that everybody has to sympathize with Mr. Jewell
and his mother. Comment by veteran journalist
Marvin Kalb
31Words of wisdom
- We have to draw a distinction between the right
to do something and the right thing to
do.--Jonathan Alter, columnist and senior editor
at Newsweek.
32Summing up
- The importance of not only the truth, but the
facts behind the truth - Balancing right to know with presumption of
innocence. - Even if countless sources tell you something is
true, it is not necessarily so - The difficulties of working under competitive
pressures