Continuous Quality Improvement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Continuous Quality Improvement

Description:

'The sum of all activities undertaken to provide confidence that the EMS system ... been defined to be anytime a laryngoscope blade is placed in the patient's mouth ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:855
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: DCIS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Continuous Quality Improvement


1
Continuous Quality Improvement
  • EMS in Chester County

2
WHAT IS CQI?
  • The concept that there is always room for
    improvement
  • A Commitment to constantly improve
  • Operations
  • Processes
  • Activities

3
WHAT IS CQI?
  • The sum of all activities undertaken to provide
    confidence that the EMS system meets a standard
    of excellence.
  • -- Dr. Ron Roth
  • Medical Director
  • City of Pittsburgh

4
CQI IS NECESSARY
  • It helps to improve the overall delivery of EMS
    in Chester County
  • It promotes improvement
  • It shows our customers that the services we
    provide are quality services
  • It helps to show our performance compared to
    other systems in the Country

5
CQI IS REQUIRED
  • While the driving force behind CQI is the desire
    and willingness to improve, there is also a legal
    requirement for CQI
  • PA Code, Title 28, Chapter 1001, Section 61
    through 65

6
CQI AND TITLE 28
  • Title 28, Chapter 1001.65, Cooperation
  • Each individual and entity licensed, certified,
    recognized, accredited or otherwise authorized by
    the Department to participate in the Statewide
    EMS system shall cooperate in the Statewide and
    regional EMS quality improvement programs. These
    individuals and entities shall provide
    information, data, reports and access to records
    as requested by the Department and regional EMS
    councils to monitor the delivery of EMS.

7
WHO?
  • CQI Involves EVERYONE!
  • Providers
  • Supervisors
  • Captains
  • Chiefs
  • Hospitals
  • EVERYONE

8
WHO?
  • The members of the CQI Committee are
  • Adrianne Pohar, Medic 91
  • Dr. Larry Anderson, BWH County Medical Director
  • John Felicetti, Medic 91
  • Bob Hotchkiss, Medic 94 EMS Council
  • Cathie Rawlings, Medic 93
  • Doug Morrow, University MedEvac
  • Nick Campbell, Malvern
  • Sadye Sardone, EMS Provider Instructor
  • Jeff Gewertz, Minquas
  • DES Employees Steve Webb, Harry Moore, Pat Cook,
    Leroy Pierce, and Bob Kagel

9
WHAT IS BEING STUDIED?
  • To begin only two areas will be examined
  • Intubations
  • Category 3 Trauma Patients
  • As the program progresses, more areas will be
    examined

10
HOW IS IT BEING STUDIED?
  • The committee will review charts received on a
    bi-monthly basis
  • That is where YOU are critical to this process
  • Documentation is key, be sure to write a complete
    narrative
  • Upon completion of the patient care report, fax
    it to DES at (610) 344-5063 if it meets the
    criteria for inclusion

11
INTUBATIONS
  • General
  • Was there sufficient documentation indicating a
    need for intubation?
  • If yes, was intubation performed?
  • If yes, was intubation successful on the first
    attempt?
  • If no, was intubation successful within 3
    attempts?
  • If no, how was the airway secured?
  • Was the method used to secure the tube
    documented?
  • Was tube position checked and documented
    initially and after patient movement?
  • Was the tube depth documented?

12
INTUBATIONS
  • What is an attempt?
  • An attempt has been defined to be anytime a
    laryngoscope blade is placed in the patients
    mouth

13
INTUBATIONS
  • Attempts 1, 2, 3
  • What was the provider level making this attempt?
  • What was the method of attempt? (Oral/Nasal)
  • Was there medication facilitation used?
  • Was a rescue device used? (Combitube/Trach)
  • How was the tube confirmed (Primary Secondary,
    and if documented, tertiary)
  • Was the attempt successful?

14
INTUBATIONS
  • Confirmation
  • Was the primary, secondary, and if applicable,
    tertiary means of confirmation documented?
    (direct visualization, lung sounds, SA02,
    epigastric sounds)
  • Was an esophageal detection device (EDD) used?
    Result documented?
  • Was a colorimetric end tidal carbon dioxide
    (ETCO2) detector used? Result documented?
  • Was a digital ETCO2 detector used? Serial
    readings documented?
  • Was a waveform ETCO2 detector used? Serial
    readings documented? Printout attached?

15
TRAUMA
  • We are adding a tracking mechanism for ALL
    traumas
  • In order to better track trauma patients in the
    system, we are implementing RESEARCH CODES

16
TRAUMA RESEARCH CODES
  • 010 If a Category 1 Trauma patient that was
    flown to a trauma center
  • 011 If a Category 1 Trauma patient that was
    taken by ground to a trauma center
  • 012 If a Category 1 Trauma patient that was
    taken to a local hospital

17
TRAUMA RESEARCH CODES
  • 020 Category 2 Trauma Patient flown to a trauma
    center
  • 021 Category 2 Trauma Patient grounded to a
    trauma center
  • 022 Category 2 Trauma Patient taken to a local
    hospital

18
TRAUMA RESEARCH CODES
  • 030 Category 3 Trauma patient flown to a trauma
    center
  • 031 Category 3 Trauma patient grounded to a
    trauma center
  • 032 Category 3 Trauma patient taken to a local
    hospital

19
TRAUMA RESEARCH CODES
  • Where do I document the Research Codes?
  • In EMMA, on the Situation Screen
  • You will enter the physical codes described
    previously
  • In EMStat, on Page 3
  • Select from the drop down box the appropriate
    description of the code

20
TRAUMA RESEARCH CODES
21
TRAUMA RESEARCH CODES
22
CATEGORY 3 TRAUMA
  • Does the documentation support classifying this
    patient as a Category 3 Trauma patient?
  • If no, what makes the reader believe this was not
    a Category 3 Trauma Patient?
  • If no, what category does the reader believe the
    patient was?
  • If yes, was the patient taken to the appropriate
    facility (local receiving facility)?
  • If yes, by what means was the patient
    transported? (air/ground)

23
WHERE?
  • Where did the criteria come from?
  • It all came from the protocols
  • Intubations ALS protocols
  • Category 3 Trauma Statewide BLS Protocols

24
GOALS
  • What are the goals?
  • Intubation
  • 100 indicated intubations recognized/performed
  • 80 successful on first intubation attempt
  • 90 successful within 3 attempts
  • 100 patients with patent/secured airway upon
    arrival receiving facility
  • Category 3 Trauma
  • 70 compliance for appropriate destination
  • 100 compliance for mode of transport

25
WHEN?
  • This program will begin on April 1, 2006
  • April 1 begin sending all charts that meet the
    following criteria
  • Intubation attempt
  • Patients who meet the Category 3 Trauma
    Classification

APRIL
1
26
QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION
  • For more information, questions, or to become
    involved
  • See any committee member
  • Or call Bob Kagel, (610) 344-4335,
    rkagel_at_chesco.org

27
THANK YOU
  • Thank you for helping to make EMS in Chester
    County the best it can be!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com