Deformed Nuclei - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Deformed Nuclei

Description:

Oblate: Q ve, -ve. Prolate: Q ve, ve ... Oblate Q -ve. Prolate Q ve. Rotational states in deformed nuclei. Classically. Rotational AM L ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:360
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: ole4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Deformed Nuclei


1
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
2
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
3
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
4
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
5
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
6
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
7
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
8
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
9
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
10
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
11
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
12
Lecture 9
Deformed Nuclei
13
Single proton outside closed shell
Q is negative (zero for core and negative for
single proton)
e.g. 19F Calc. -0.036 Meas. -0.12
Single proton missing from closed shell
  e.g. 27Al (28Si p) Calc 0.036 Meas 0.14
14
Predictions for Q for neutrons
For a single neutron outside a closed core,
expect Q0, since neutron has no charge.
NOT TRUE the neutron attracts the protons and
makes a ridge
So Q is ve for a single neutron just as for a
single proton!
e.g. 17O (16O n) calc 0.038 meas. 0.026
Conversely a neutron hole leads to ve Q
15
Shell-model Quadrupole moments
At best we can account for sign, and approximate
size for nuclei near closed shells..not really
encouraging
16
Electric Quadrupole moments
Shell model can account for Q if N or Z near
within /-1 of magic numbers
The further away from magic numbers the worse the
agreement
Some nuclei have extreme deformations and we need
another model
17
The shell Model so far
How good is it???
18
The shell Model so far
How good is it???
19
The shell Model so far
How good is it???
20
The shell Model so far
How good is it???
21
The shell Model so far
How good is it???
22
The shell Model so far
How good is it???
23
Modifying the Nuclear Shell Model
19F
Predicted ground-state I? ?
Observed ground-state I? ½ !!
19F is not spherical Assumed SM Potential was
spherically symmetric Deformed nuclei have
axially symmetric mass distribution ? Axially
symmetric average potential
24
? ---a measure of deformation
25
Nilsson and the deformed Shell Model
Assumed SM potential spherically symmetric
? nucleon in same potential regardless of
orientation
For deformed nucleus this is not true!
26
Oblate Q ve, ? -ve
Prolate Q ve, ? ve
27
Shell-model levels for spherical nucleus
28
Shell-model levels for deformed nucleus
29
Shell-model levels for deformed nucleus
30
IGS 5/2
Measured ½!!
19F Z9, N10
31
IGS 5/2
Measured ½!!
19Ne Z10, N9
32
24Mg Z12, N12 IGS 0
33
23Na Z11, N12
IGS 5/2
Measured IGS 3/2
34
The Collective model
Can we account for nuclear properties modelling
the nucleus as a whole?.collectively
We did this with the Semi-empirical mass
formulapredicted binding energies
We will consider
Rotations of deformed nuclei
Oscillations of spherical nuclei
35
Rotational states in deformed nuclei
We will examine these nuclei with large ve
deformations
We will restrict our discussion to nuclei with N
and Z even (i.e. Nuclei with GS I? 0
36
Rotational states in deformed nuclei
  • Spin and parity of states
  • 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, ..

2 Spacing of excited states Geometrically
increasing
Why??
37
Rotational states in deformed nuclei
Consider rotation about axes other than symmetry
axis
Classically Rotational AM L ??
I even only, because of parity of GS
I 0, 2, 4, 6, etc
38
Rotational states in deformed nuclei
39
Rotational states in deformed nuclei
The theoretical ratio of En/E2
Is greater than the measured ratio (data points)
Reason Nucleus is not a rigid body. At higher E,
(higher ?), it stretches.
40
Levels for the nucleus 130Sn
A spherical nucleus!
GS I? 0 as expected
Can we explain the level structure
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com