Title: Explaining Crime: Emphasis on the Individual
1Chapter 5
- Explaining Crime Emphasis on the Individual
2Understanding Theories of Crime
- Theories of crime try to answer at least 1 of 3
questions - Why are some people more likely than others to
commit crime? - Why are some categories of people more likely
than others to commit crime? - Why is crime more common in some locations than
in others?
3- Biology and Psychology tend to focus on first
question (individual) - Sociology focuses on last 2 questions (social
environment) - Micro smaller picture
- Macro larger picture
4MICRO OR MACRO?
- THE EATING DISORDER ANOLOGY (text p. 133)
- IS CRIME THE RESULT OF SOCIETY STRUCTURE OR
INDIVIDUAL DISORDER? - WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE ANSWER?
5- The Classical School of Criminology
- (1738-1794) Cesare Beccaria (father of modern
criminology), On Crimes and Punishments - (1748-1832) Jeremy Bentham law was more severe
than it needed to be to keep rational people from
committing crime
6Cesare Beccaria
- People act rationally through free will.
- People will chose pleasure and avoid pain.
- Punishment should be minimum to deter.
- Condemned torture and inhumane treatments.
- Influenced U.S. founders constitution.
7Jeremy Bentham
- Focus on deterrence.
- Advocated reform of law in England.
- Influenced the creation of the modern prison
system. - Influenced the founders of the modern policing.
8The Rise of Positivism
- Use of scientific method to study human behavior
- Postulated human behavior is affected by outside
forces - Founded by August Comte
- One problem is theory assumes criminals are
different from the rest of us
9Rational Choice Explanations and Deterrence
- Rational-choice theory assumes people choose to
commit crime after calculating whether its
rewards outweigh risks - Deterrence theory assumes potential and actual
punishment can deter crime
10Types of Deterrence
- General occurs when members of public decide not
to break the law because they fear punishment - Specific occurs when offenders already punished
decide not to commit another crime - Objective impact of actual legal punishment
- Subjective impact of peoples perceptions of
likelihood and severity of legal punishment
11Evaluation of Rational-Choice and Deterrence
Theory
- Evidence on deterrence is inconsistent
- Predicts higher arrest and imprisonment rates
should produce lower crime rates, but this does
not occur - Harsher penalties should lower crime rates, but
this pattern does not occur
12- Offenders caught and punished should reoffend
less, but evidence of this is mixed - No evidence that criminals make rational choices
or weigh consequences of their actions
13Biological Explanations
- Nineteenth Century Views
- Phrenology study of skull size in relation to
criminality - Cesare Lombroso, Founder of positivist school
- Atavism criminals are throwbacks to earlier
stage of evolution
14Tools of Phrenology
15Tools of Phrenology
16Cesare Lombroso
- Atavism Criminals are evolutionary throwbacks.
- Measured prisoners bodies and compared
measurements to soldiers. - Criminals generally had longer arms, larger
skulls and hairy bodies.
17A drawing showing the alleged physical and
psychological relationship between man and
animal. From New Physiognomy or Signs of
Character (1871)
18A 19th century image indicating a suspected
resemblance between appearance and personality.
From New Physiognomy or Signs of Character
(1871)
19Facial characteristics described by Lombroso,
some of which may indicate criminality. From New
Physiognomy or Signs of Character (1871)
20Cesare Lombroso
21Early Twentieth Century Views
- Earnest Hooton, biological inferiority advocated
sterilization of criminals or exile - William Sheldon, somatology body shapes affect
personalities - Endomorphs
- Mesomorphs
- Ectomorphs
22(No Transcript)
23Group Exercises
24Contemporary ExplanationsGroup 1
- Review and Present
- Family, Heredity, and Genes
- Early research on the Juke family
- Twin studies
- Adoption studies
- Evolutionary biology
- Chromosomal abnormalities
25Neurochemical Factors Group 2
- Review and Present
- Hormones Testosterone and Male Criminality
- Testosterone a cause of male criminality?
- Increase in aggressive behavior
- Hormones PMS and Crime by Women
- Premenstrual Syndrome leads to aggression?
- Neurotransmitters
- Serotonin
26Diet and NutritionGroup 3
- Review and Present
- Twinkie Defense
- Poor nutrition lead to criminal behavior?
- Research concludes at most a relatively minor
effect on criminality - Pregnancy and Birth Complications
- Poor nutrition, alcohol, tobacco use during
pregnancy
27Psychological ExplanationsGroup 4
- Review and Present
- Crime arises from internal disturbances from
early childhood - Sigmund Freud, founder of psychoanalysis
- Mental disorders derive from conflict between
society and instinctive needs of the individual - Id
- Ego
- Superego
28Evaluation of Biological Explanations
- Crime is too diverse for biological explanations
to account for all behavior - Methodological problems in research studies
- Cannot easily account for group rate differences
- Social policy implications
- We cannot change biology
- Potential justification for appalling acts
29Evaluation of Psychological Explanations
- Psychoanalytic explanations limited in explaining
criminal behavior - Suggests antisocial behavior is mentally
disordered behavior - Neglects social factors and overemphasizes
childhood experiences - Research in this area relies on case histories
- Sexist in their explanation of females and their
behavior
30Moral Development and Crime
- Jean Piaget, mental and moral development in
children four stages of development - Sensorimotor birth to 2 years. learn through
senses - Preoperational 2-7 years. learning language,
drawing, other skills - Concrete operations 7-11 years. logical
thinking and problem solving - Formal operations 11-15 years. abstract ideas
31Kohlberg Research
- 1960s and 1970s research
- Moral development is more than life experiences
- Universal system of moral development for
children and adults everywhere - System of six stages of moral development
32Kohlbergs Model of Moral Development
- Pre-conventional Level moral reasoning
motivated by concern for self. - Conventional Level moral reasoning concerned
with following the rules and fulfilling duty. - Post-conventional Level focused on determining
the universal good.
33Six Stages of Moral Development
- Stage One
- The Punishment and Obedience Orientation
- In stage one, the right thing to do is to obey
authority figures in order to avoid punishment.
34Six Stages of Moral Development
- Stage Two
- Instrument and Relativity Orientation
- Individuals think of right and wrong in terms of
what is in it for them. Now, the right thing to
do is whatever meets the individuals own needs.
35Six Stages of Moral Development
- Stage Three
- The Interpersonal Concordance Orientation
- People at this stage tend to be very concerned
about what others think of them. Now, the right
thing to do is whatever gets me social approval.
36Six Stages of Moral Development
- Stage Four
- The Law and Order Orientation
- Individuals see themselves as being part of a
larger community or society. Motivation is not
fear of punishment, but respect for the system
and the social order. Stage four people think
that what is legally right and what is morally
right are the same thing.
37Six Stages of Moral Development
- Stage Five
- The Social Contract Orientation
- Moral responsibility is understood in terms of
the deepest values and principles of ones
society.
38Six Stages of Moral Development
- Stage Six
- The Universal Ethical Principles Orientation
- This highest stage is where morality turns more
personal. There exist universal moral principles
and rules that apply to all humans.
39- Kohlberg - theory of moral development ability
to distinguish right from wrong - In early stages, moral reasoning related solely
to punishment - Later stages begin to realize society and parents
have rules - People recognize universal moral principles
supercede laws of any one society - Not everyone makes it through all stages of moral
development
40- Intelligence and Crime
- Is low IQ to blame for criminal behavior?
- Low IQ linked to delinquency
- Poor school performance leads to less attachments
to school - Lower self-esteem
- Lower ability to engage in moral reasoning
- Less able to appreciate consequences of actions
- Race, IQ, and Crime
- Troubling racial overtones in contemporary
research - Differences in IQs between blacks and whites
- Methodological flaws in research
41- New personality research has important
implications for reducing crime - Preschool and early family intervention programs
- Address aspects of social environment to reduce
crime - Problems with new personality research
- Cannot adequately account for relativity of
deviance do not help understand why one behavior
instead of the other is chosen - Some people with personality problems do not
break the law
42- Evaluation of Psychological Explanations
- Fill in smaller picture of crime
- Psychological studies often use small,
unrepresentative samples results should be
interpreted cautiously - Generally disregard structural factors (i.e.
poverty) - Causal order remains unclear
- Rarely study white-collar offenders
43- Abnormality or Normality?
- Psychological approaches suggest crime/criminals
are psychologically abnormal - Can still commit crime and be psychologically
normal
44Next Week
- Read Chapter 6 Sociological Theories
- Emphasis on Social Structure