REGNET Power Point Template

1
(No Transcript)
2
Working Groups in Sofia

• 2 Working Groups / 1 hour / 1 rapporteur
• Quality of written information
• Quality of pictures, links / legal issues
• Tasks
• Please discuss the content criteria listed(see
  working material)
• Please prepare a short presentation of the
  results to the other working group members

3
Discussion points (plenum)

• Please discuss the following issues related to
  content quality

• Do the content criteria dimensions (text, image,
  link ...) reflect the needs of the REGNET
  project? Are there further dimensions, which?
• Content quality is assured at various stages in
  the content generation process. Which types of
  quality assurance do already exist in the
  participating organisations? For which types of
  content (News / Newsletter, Collection, Profile,
  Address, Events, Links, Vocabulary) do quality
  assurance procedures apply already? For which
  other types is a formal content quality assurance
  plan necessary?

4
Discussion points (plenum)
Please discuss the following issues related to
content quality

• Which parts of the QA process could be
  automatised and how?
• Which level of quality should be reached (100
  ?!)
• Who should be the owner of the different
  aspects of content quality assurance (individual
  Regnet member, Regnet content working group /
  centralised, Regnet technology group)(the owner
  is the responsible person / group for the
  implementation of the quality assurance processes
  for the respective dimensions / attributes of
  content quality)