Reimaging Lens Polarization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Reimaging Lens Polarization

Description:

As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro-Polarimeter. October, 2004. FPP Team. Bruce W. Lites ... FPP Spectro-Polarimeter Performance. SUMMARY: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: elm2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reimaging Lens Polarization


1
As-Built Performance of the FPP
Spectro-Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team
Bruce W. Lites 303 497 1517 lites_at_ucar.edu
2
FPP Spectro-Polarimeter Performance
  • AS-BUILT PERFORMANCE OF THE FPP-SP
  • Slit Scanning mechanism
  • Vignetting as the image is scanned across the
    slit
  • Spectral response function
  • Signal/Noise (polarimetric precision)
  • Scattered Light
  • System Polarization Calibration

3
Performance Requirements
  • Polarization Accuracy Matrix (for measured Stokes
    parameters I,Q,U,V)
  • Spectrum Range 6301-6303 Å
  • Spectral Purity FWHM ? 35 mÅ
  • Spectral Sample ? 25 mÅ
  • Undispersed light scatter lt 0.01
  • Polarization signal-to-noise, continuum gt 10001

4
Performance of the Slit Scanning Mechanism
  • In order to produce maps of the vector magnetic
    field, the slit scanner should provide regular
    and reproducible samples of the image plane in
    the direction perpendicular to the slit.
  • The slit scanning mechanism nominal range is 2000
    steps of 0.16 arcsec on the Sun
  • Requirements
  • Repeatability 0.33 step
  • Linearity no two adjacent steps separated by gt
    0.32 arcsec
  • Performance
  • Step size on Sun 0.148 arcsec (average)
  • Range to limit switches 3233 steps (478.9 arcsec
    on Sun only 320 arcsec are needed)

5
Theodolite Measurements of Slit Scanner
Measured deflection of the beam as a function of
slit scan step number. Also shown is the linear
fit to the points. (Scan mirror motion of 1
arcsec corrseponds to 1/13.3 arcsec motion of the
solar image on the slit)
Departures of the measured beam deflection are
shown as a function of scan mirror step position.
A periodic error in the deflection corresponds
to one rotation of the ball screw. Amplitude of
this error is of order 1.2 arcsec on the sun per
400 steps (60 arcsec of scanning)
6
Theodolite Measurements of Slit Scanner
Repeatability of the scanner is measured for 4
short scans around the center of the slit scan
range. Measured positions agree within 1
arcsec, corresponding to 0.075 arcsec on the
Sun. Some of this error may arise from the
measurement process.
7
Optical Verification of Slit Scanner In Completed
FPP

Map of reticle image test central range of slit
scanner
8
Optical Verification of Slit Scanner In Completed
FPP

Deviation of measured reticle line from a linear
fit
black steep slope line red shallow slope line
9
Slit Scanner Performance
  • Large-scale sinusoidal variations in the slit
    scan step size 1.2 arcsec deviation from linear
    over 400 steps (60 arcsec)
  • Short scans positions are repeatable within
    about 0.15 arcsec peak (0.025 arcsec rms)
  • No adjacent steps deviate by more than 1 step

10
Slit Scan Vignetting
Scan Mirror Step Number
Scan Mirror Step Number
19 August 2004 NAOJ SP intensity vs. scan mirror
position before pre-slit repair. FPP on OBU with
solar feed.
26 May 2005 NAOJ SP intensity vs. scan mirror
position after pre-slit repair. FPP on optical
bench. Solar feed with telescope simulator.
11
FPP-SP Spectral Resolution
  • Spectral resolution was monitored by measurement
    of the spectrum from the tunable laser
  • Rotating diffuser in beam to reduce laser speckle
  • Short integrations to minimize the effects of
    drift of the laser wavelength
  • Image at right shows sample laser measurement in
    both polarization images
  • Tuning the laser wavelength allows measurement of
    spectral response over the entire image plane

12
FPP-SP Spectral Resolution
  • Fitted Laser Line Width Along Slit Periodic
    Width Variation
  • Spectrum is undersampled (instrumental width
    is25mÅ, sampling is 21.3mÅ)
  • Spectrum curvature samples the profile along the
    slit at differing shifts relative to the peak of
    the emission line
  • Gaussian fitting procedure has some sensitivity
    to phase of undersampled points relative to the
    emission line center

13
FPP-SP Spectral Resolution
  • Measured Variation of Spectral Resolution along
    Slit Length and Within Spectral Field of Each
    CCDSIDE
  • Post-vibration data, 8 February 2006
  • Average spectral width in 100-pixel bins along
    slit
  • No significant variations either along the slit,
    or as a function of wavelength
  • All widths considerably smaller than 35mÅ
    requirement

14
FPP-SP Spectral Resolution
Use the Spectrum Curvature to Advantage
  • Assume small variation of the spectral resolution
    profile along the length of the slit
  • Normalize each spectral profile
  • Shift each profile to a common line center
    position (shift from fitting procedure)
  • Arrive at an instrumental resolution profile
    highly sampled in wavelength
  • Red wing asymmetry a feature of the spectrograph
    design

15
FPP-SP Polarization S/N
  • FPP-SP flux levels measured during Sun tests
  • Measurements of transmission of heliostat and
    window
  • Solar radiance measurements simultaneously during
    Sun tests
  • Radiance measurements calibrated to zero airmass
  • These measurements and extrapolations allow one
    to extrapolate to the on-orbit S/N in
    polarimetric measurements
  • Inputs
  • Dark-corrected continuum intensity in raw
    measurement units (DN)
  • Measured SP CCD scale factor 100 e-/DN
  • Read Noise 110 e-
  • Heliostat transmission at 630 nm 0.51
  • Atmospheric transmission at time of measurements
    0.58
  • Sum two sides of CCD
  • Polarization modulation efficiency 0.5
  • Anticipated S/N, Typical 4.8 sec Integration
  • Continuum, Quiet Sun 1100
  • Line center, Quiet Sun 580
  • Line center, Umbra 164

16
Scattered/Stray Light in the FPP-SP
  • Measurements made of scattering inside the
    spectrograph by means of a mask placed over the
    slit.
  • Intensity as a function of distance from the mask
    edge shows
  • Maximum intensity adjacent to the mask edge is
    0.017 of the illuminated intensity
  • Scattering falls below the required 10-2 level
    at a distance of 60 pixels (10 arcsec) from the
    edge

17
FPP-SP Polarization Calibration
  • Calibration of entire SOT-FPP-SP optical system
    during Sun tests, June 2005
  • Linear, right-, and left-circular polarizers over
    entrance of OTA
  • Observations
  • Clear (no polarizer)
  • Linear, right-, left-circular polarizers
  • Four rotation stations of each 0º, 45º, 90º,
    135º
  • Standard mode observations (4.8s integrations)
  • Two spectral ROIs covering entire spectral range
  • Nine such data sets covering entire slit scan
    range

18
FPP-SP Polarization Calibration
  • Data Analysis
  • Bin data spatially along slit (16x) and
    spectrally (2x) to reduce data volume and
    increase S/N
  • Normalize each Stokes vector observation to the
    measured Stokes I
  • Each binned pixel for each CCDSIDE was subjected
    to a non-linear least-squares fitting procedure
    to determine
  • 15 polarization response matrix elements (0,0
    element I?I crosstalk set to unity)
  • Mount offset error of angular orientation for
    right- and for left-circular polarizers

19
FPP-SP Polarization Calibration
Polarization Accuracy Requirement and Measured
Polarization Response Matrix
1.00000 0.21996 0.01587 0.00437
-0.00033 0.48083 0.07739 -0.00125
-0.00072 0.06002 -0.47494 -0.00561
-0.00028 0.00437 -0.00792 0.52939
Typical system response matrix for CCDSIDE0, for
the left ROI (without strong spectral lines).
Off-diagonal values highlighted in red exceed
those of the polarization accuracy matrix.
Polarization Accuracy Matrix Requirement
  • It is almost the case that no polarization
    calibration is necessary response matrix is
    nearly diagonal, within the required accuracy!
  • Calibration should improve the polarization
    precision by at least an order of magnitude
    better than the requirement

20
FPP-SP Polarization Calibration
Features of the polarization response matrix
1.00000 0.21996 0.01587 0.00437
-0.00033 0.48083 0.07739 -0.00125
-0.00072 0.06002 -0.47494 -0.00561
-0.00028 0.00437 -0.00792 0.52939
Typical system response matrix for CCDSIDE0, for
the left ROI (without strong spectral lines).
Off-diagonal values highlighted in red exceed
those of the polarization accuracy matrix.
Polarization Accuracy Matrix Requirement
  • The off-diagonal Q?U and U?Q elements (in red)
    represent a simple rotation of coordinate system,
    in this case by only about 2.5º.
  • The second element of the first row shows the
    large value of Q?I crosstalk typical of a
    single-beam polarimeter. When the two CCDSIDEs
    are combined, this response is largely cancelled.
  • Diagonal elements are close to their anticipated
    values.
  • Intensity to polarization crosstalk (first column
    of the matrix) is very small.

21
FPP-SP Polarization Calibration
Spatial/Spectral Variation of the Measured
Polarization Response Matrix
ROI 0-112
ROI 112-224
  • Variations of the matrix across the field are
    smaller than the uncertainties, except for first
    column (I?Q,U,V, easily calibrated on orbit)
  • Residual smoothed variations are on the order of
    few x 10-4 of the continuum intensity

----- 0.00040 0.00053 0.00037 0.00432
0.00308 0.00115 0.00077 0.00173 0.00139
0.00289 0.00130 0.00203 0.00045 0.00035
0.00166
RMS fluctuations of the response matrix for ROI
0-112, CCDSIDE0
22
FPP Spectro-Polarimeter Performance
  • SUMMARY
  • The FPP-SP meets (and exceeds) its performance
    requirements
  • Polarization calibration will be carried out as a
    function of wavelength, dimension along the slit,
    and slit scan position to account for small
    variations
  • The spectral response function, highly sampled in
    wavelength, will be used in the inversion process
  • Signal/Noise is higher than anticipated because
    of excess read noise in the cameras.
    Nonetheless, the goal of 10001 in the continuum
    per spectral/spatial pixel is achieved
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com