A Marx for Post Keynesians - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

A Marx for Post Keynesians

Description:

Opposition to neoclassical method sole agreed common ground ... Deductive logic, Axioms and Positivism. Organic vs Atomic Axioms ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: steve1315
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Marx for Post Keynesians


1
A Marx for Post Keynesians
  • Steve Keen

Department of Economics University of
NSW Australia
2
Introduction
  • The Post Keynesian Glass House
  • Methodological criticism without methodological
    foundations
  • Marxs two sets of axioms
  • A methodological foundation for Post Keynesianism

3
Post Keynesian MethodologyUnity in Opposition?
  • Opposition to neoclassical method sole agreed
    common ground
  • Harcourt and Hamouda diversity is strength
  • Horses for courses and Instrumentalism
  • Backhouse why is neoclassical methodology always
    inappropriate?

4
Philosophy
  • Keynes From atomism to internal relations
  • Whitehead a hierarchy of internal relations
  • Lawson/Bhaskar
  • Deductive logic, Axioms and Positivism
  • Organic vs Atomic Axioms
  • Realism does not rule out axiomatic reasoning

5
Dialectics and Organicism
  • Social Unities
  • Foreground and background aspects
  • The philosophy of endogenous change
  • Marxs advantage over Whiteheads hierarchy of
    internal relations
  • Identifying the central unity of the commodity
  • Structured axiomatic foundation for
    classical/Post Keynesian analysis

6
Post Keynesianism vs Marxs Two Sets of Axioms
7
Marxs Labor Axioms
  • Value is socially necessary labor-time
  • Commodities exchange in proportion to value
  • Labor-power is a commodity under capitalism
  • Labor transfers value directly to product,
    commodities indirectly
  • Difference between labor and labor-power unique

8
The Labor Theory of Value
  • Value of labor-power subsistence wage bundle
    of commodities
  • Labor-time gt value of labor-power
  • Difference is source of surplus-value
  • Additional axioms
  • Prices proportional to variable and constant
    capital
  • Reconciliation of values and prices via
    transformation problem
  • Uni-directional analysis of capitalism,
    historically invalidated predictions

9
Marxs Commodity Axioms
  • Commodity the essential unity of capitalism
  • Use-value and exchange-value key aspects
  • Use-value objective
  • Exchange-valueexchange-value of inputs
  • Incommensurable under capitalism
  • Labor-power a commodity
  • Two main circuits
  • C-M-C (consumption)
  • M-C-M (production)

10
Source of Surplus
  • Labor Axioms
  • Difference between value of labor power and value
    labor transfers to product
  • Unique attributes of labor/labor-power
  • Commodity Axioms
  • Quantitative difference between use-value and
    exchange-value in circuit of capital
  • Common to all commodities
  • Contradicts Labor Axioms

11
Basis for incommensurability of use-value and
exchange-value
  • Pre-capitalist society
  • Exchange of use-values socially determined
  • Commodity exchange on the border of societies
  • Perception of utility can influence exchange
    ratio
  • Production specifically for exchange
  • Distinction between use-value and use-value for
    exchange
  • Production the basis of exchange-value
  • Capitalist exchange
  • Exchange-value and use-value incommensurable

12
Effective Demand
  • From M-C-M to C-M-C Use-value predominates
  • Three barriers
  • The entirely superficial
  • Market level
  • The economy expanded reproduction, aggregate
    demand, and credit
  • Critique of Says Law
  • Capitalists supply dynamically exceeds demand
    accumulation invalidates Say
  • Capitalism without capitalists

13
Wages and Value
  • Labor Axioms
  • Average WageValue (Harvey, Green)
  • Extra-economic determination
  • Commodity Axioms
  • Labor-power a commodity AND non-commodity
  • The dialectic of labor Value is wage minimum
  • "The natural price of labour is nothing but the
    minimum wage." (1846, p. 55.)
  • "Ricardo, e.g., who believes that the bourgeois
    economy deals only with exchange value, and is
    concerned with use-value only esoterically,
    derives the most important determinations of
    exchange value precisely from use-value, from the
    relation between the two of them for instance,
    ... wage minimum". (1857, pp. 646.)
  • "For the time being, necessary labour supposed as
    such i.e. that the worker always obtains only
    the minimum of wages...."(1857, p. 817.)
  • "the value of the labour power is equal to the
    minimum of wages",(Marx 1857, Part I, p. 46.)
  • 2 components cost of reproduction plus share in
    surplus (Sraffa)

14
Endogenous Money and Asset Prices
  • Money as a commodity/non-commodity
  • Exchanged, and essential for exchange,
  • But not produced by means of commodities
  • Dialectic of money
  • Exchange-value set by use-value
  • "What, now, does the industrial capitalist pay,
    and what is, therefore, the price of the loaned
    capital?... What the buyer of an ordinary
    commodity, buys is its use-value what he pays
    for is its value. What the borrower of money buys
    is likewise its use-value as capital but what
    does he pay for? Surely not its price, or value,
    as in the case of ordinary commodities." (Marx
    1894, p. 352.)
  • Money endogenous
  • Two price levels (Minsky, Davidson)

15
Commodities and Non-Commodities
  • Commodities
  • Produced by commodities
  • Involved in the production of other commodities
  • Exceptions
  • Artworks, rare wines (Ricardo)
  • New products
  • Other doctrines
  • Sraffian
  • All products are commodities
  • Austrian
  • All products are non-commodities

16
Conclusion
  • Post Keynesianism not eclectic but dialectic
  • Benefits from adopting Marxs Commodity Axioms
  • Methodological consistency
  • Unify disparate analyses
  • Alternative paradigm to neoclassical
  • Objectivist vs Subjectivist
  • Organic vs Atomistic
  • Dynamic vs Static
  • Pedagogy

17
The Revelation
  • "Is not value to be conceived as the unity of
    use-value and exchange value? In and for itself,
    is value as such the general form, in opposition
    to use-value and exchange value as particular
    forms of it? Does this have significance in
    economics? ... Does not use-value as such enter
    ... as a determinant of the form itself, e.g. in
    the relation of capital and labour? ... If only
    exchange value as such plays a role in economics,
    then how could elements later enter which relate
    purely to use-value ... This is not in the
    slightest contradicted by the fact that exchange
    value is the predominant aspect. But of course
    use does not come to a halt because it is
    determined only by exchange ... this is to be
    examined with exactitude in the examination of
    value, and not, as Ricardo does, to be entirely
    abstracted from, nor like the dull Say, who puffs
    himself up with the mere presupposition of the
    word utility'. Above all it will and must become
    clear ... to what extent use-value exists not
    only as presupposed matter, outside economics and
    its forms, but to what extent it enters into it.
    ... The two aspects in no way enter into relation
    with each other, ... Money itself is a commodity,
    has a use-value for its substance."(1857, pp.
    267-68.)

18
The Application
  • "The change of value that occurs in the case of
    money intended to be converted into capital ...
    must ... take place in the commodity bought by
    the first act, M-C, but not in its value, for
    equivalents are exchanged, and the commodity is
    paid for at its full value. We are, therefore,
    forced to the conclusion that the change
    originates in the use-value, as such, of the
    commodity, i.e. its consumption." (p. 164)
  • "the daily cost of maintaining it, and its daily
    expenditure in work, are two totally different
    things. The former determines the exchange value
    of the labour power, the latter is its
    use-value... Therefore, the value of labour
    power, and the value which that labour power
    creates in the labour process, are two entirely
    different magnitudes ... What really influenced
    him was the specific use-value which this
    commodity possesses of being a source not only of
    value, but of more value than it has itself. ...
    in this transaction he acts in accordance with
    the 'eternal laws' of the exchange of
    commodities. The seller of labour power, like the
    seller of any other commodity, realises its
    exchange value, and parts with its use-value."
    (p. 188.)

19
Wages and value
  • "Ricardo, e.g., who believes that the bourgeois
    economy deals only with exchange value, and is
    concerned with use-value only exoterically,
    derives the most important determinations of
    exchange value precisely from use-value, from the
    relation between the two of them for instance,
    ... wage minimum". (1857, pp. 646.)
  • "the value of the labour power is equal to the
    minimum of wages", (1864, I, p. 46.)
  • "the minimum wage, alias the value of labour
    power".(1864, II, p. 223.)

20
Expectations, use-value, and asset prices
  • "Ricardo never uses the word value for utility or
    usefulness or "value in use". Does he therefore
    mean to say that the "compensation" is paid to
    the owner of the quarries and coalmines for the
    "value" the coal and stone have before they are
    removed from the quarry and the mine--in their
    original state? Then he invalidates his entire
    doctrine of value. Or does value mean here, as it
    must do, the possible use-value and hence the
    prospective exchange-value of coal or stone?"
    (1864, II, p. 400. Emphases in original)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com