Leading Effective Professional Learning Communities with eCart - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Leading Effective Professional Learning Communities with eCart

Description:

Leading Effective Professional Learning Communities with eCart. Presented to ... Professional Learning Communities coupled with Formative Assessment is a key ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: FCP17
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leading Effective Professional Learning Communities with eCart


1
Leading Effective Professional Learning
Communities with eCart
  • Presented to Cluster I and II APs and Guests
  • 11/19/2008

2
Is this possible?Two students in the
same subject with classes right next door to each
other could have completely different grading
structures with different expectationsclearly a
child's grade could be determined by who they
had, not what they learned. - Mark
Greenfelder
Why do we allow this to happen?
3
"A simple question to ask is, How has the world
of a child changed in the last 150 years? and the
answer is, It's hard to imagine any way in which
it hasn't changed! But if you look at school
today versus 100 years ago, it is more similar
than dissimilar. Peter Senge, senior lecturer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4
Professional Learning Communities coupled with
Formative Assessment is a key strategy to
increasing academic achievement for all students.
eCart really works!

5
Rocky Run Middle School
6
Formative Assessment
  • Formative assessment is the process used by
    teachers and students during instruction that
    provides feedback to adjust teaching and learning
    for the purpose of improving student learning.

Council of Chief State School Officers, October
2006
Notes Process rather than a particular
test. It is not the nature of the test itself
that makes it formative or summativeit is the
use to which those results will be put.
7
  • You can enhance or destroy students desire to
    succeed in school more quickly and permanently
    through your use of assessment than with any
    other tools you have at your disposal.

-Rick Stiggins Assessment Trainers Institute
8
  • Research consistently shows that use of regular,
    high-quality Formative Assessments increases
    student achievement.

9
Why Formative AssessmentsWhat does the Research
Say?
  • Major reviews of the research on the effects of
    classroom assessment indicate that it might be
    one of the most powerful weapons in a teachers
    arsenal.
  • Robert Marzano
  • Formative Assessment does improve learning. The
    gains in achievement appear to be quite
    considerableamongst the largest ever reported
    for educational interventions.
  • Paul Black and Dylan William

10
  • The Power of Formative Assessment
  • The research reported here shows conclusively
    that formative assessment does improve learning.
    The gains in achievement appear to be quite
    considerable, amongst the largest ever reported
    for educational interventions. As an illustration
    of just how big these gains are, an effect size
    of 0.7, if it could be achieved on a nationwide
    scale, would be equivalent to raising the
    mathematics attainment score of an average
    country like England, New Zealand, or the United
    States into the top five after the Pacific rim
    countries of Singapore, Korea, Japan, and Hong
    Kong.

Assessment and Classroom Learning Black and
William
11
Why Assess?
  • Assessments are not just to provide a grade
  • Purpose of assessment is to
  • Determine if learner got it Gather evidence
    which demonstrates learning outcomes were
    achieved
  • Help teachers determine extent of student
    understanding
  • Guide next steps of instruction
  • Provide appropriate scaffolding/differentiated
    instruction for students throughout the learning
    experience and
  • Provide meaningful feedback to stakeholders
    (students, parents, other teachers,
    administrators).

12
Why Formative Assessments?
  • Efficiency
  • Fairness
  • Effective Monitoring
  • Informed practice
  • Assessment literacy
  • Raised expectations
  • Team capacity
  • Collective Response

Modified from R. DuFour keynote address at PLC
Institutes
13
Common Assessments
  • Any assessment given minimally every 2-4 weeks by
    2 or more instructors with the intention of
    collaboratively examining the results for
  • shared learning,
  • instructional planning for individual students,
    and/or
  • curriculum, instruction, and/or assessment
    modifications.

14
(No Transcript)
15
On-going AssessmentA Diagnostic Continuum
ASPIRE Assessment System
ASPIRE Pre-test Graphing Inventory KWL Checklist O
bservation Self-evaluation Questioning
ASPIRE Exit Card Peer evaluation Portfolio
Check 3-minute pause Quiz Observation Journal
Entry Talkaround Self-evaluation Questioning
Interactive Notes
ASPIRE Unit Test Performance Task Product/Exhibit
Demonstration Portfolio Review
16
  • Asking students to continue working on an
    assessment and redoing that problem until they
    correctly answer the question is associated with
    a 20 gainhaving students explain their answer
    also provides an increase of a 20 gain in
    student achievement.
  • Why then are we not doing these things
    consistentlyAs a leader charged with sound
    instruction for all students and ensuring the
    best learning environment possibleagain why not

17
Student Project Demo
Teacher Grading Demo
18
  • Making Best Practices, Common Practices
  • create a variety of common assessments, to be
    used throughout the lesson, which are aligned
    with the learning goal (unpacked standards)
  • Key Questions to ask about assessment
  • Does the assessment reflect the Benchmark
    Indicators from the eCART curriculum (POS)?
  • Do the items measure students' ability to perform
    the Indicator?
  • Does the assessment provide sufficient
    information to make decisions about whether
    students
  • have reached a given level of proficiency?
  • Does the assessment reflect the instructional
    program, the teaching resources and the
  • instructional methods?
  • Does the assessment reflect the information
    presented in the classroom?

19
  • Teachers who truly understand what they want
    their students to accomplish will almost surely
    be more instructionally successful than teachers
    whose understanding of hoped-for student
    accomplishments are murky.
  • W. James Popham

20
Writing Good Questions
  • If you dont think your teachers can do it
    effectively then every test they have ever given
    is invalid.

21
Have Student Explain their THINKING!
Short Written Response Provides a Snapshot of
Student Thinking to Target Intervention
22
Empowers students to reflect on and refine their
own understandings.
23
The real power of a PLC is using the data from
eCart to
  • A practice of being humble enough to admit
    that someone else might be better at something
    and being wise enough to learn from them.

International Benchmarking Clearinghouse
24
(No Transcript)
25
Performance Based on Standards Whole Class
Instruction
26
Test Band Performance Group
27
Creating Apples Apples. . . Teacher
28
Total Pass Rate 92.59 Total Mean Scaled Score
505.58 Goal for FY 2008 99.00 FCPS Mean
Scaled Score 491.2 FCPS Passing Rate 91.77
29
Improving Student Achievement as a Team
Total Pass Rate 99.76 Total Mean Scaled
Score 546.69 Goal for FY 2009 99.88 FCPS
Pass Rate 91.9 FCPS Mean Scaled Score TBA
30
In Search of the Magic Bullet
  • It doesnt existand never will

31
Results Now Mike Schmoker, ASCD, 2006
There is no magic bullet but there is a formula
for success!
Teaching Critical Thinking
Research-based Instructional Strategies
Re-teach Reassess
Aligned Curriculum
Common Assessments
Shared Results
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com