The question of metering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The question of metering

Description:

Target Universal Metering in Essex 2020, Suffolk 2030. Some basic questions. How much water does a metered customer ... Profligate pcc for 2 person household ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: dave167
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The question of metering


1
The question of metering?
Neal Warren
2
ESW Metering Position
  • Support metering
  • 44.2 Meter Penetration
  • 55.6 Suffolk, 42.1 Essex
  • Optant / Change of Occupier schemes
  • Target Universal Metering in Essex 2020, Suffolk
    2030

3
Some basic questions
  • How much water does a metered customer use?
  • How much water does a meter save?
  • What information does a meter give us?

4
  • How much water is used around the World ?

5
(No Transcript)
6
An alternative view ?
  • EA Version
  • Eng Wales 150
  • Belgium 122
  • Netherlands 119
  • Hungary 103
  • France 137
  • Germany 116
  • OFWAT's (source waterwise)
  • Eng Wales 150
  • Belgium 107
  • Netherlands 125
  • Hungary 151
  • France 164
  • Germany 127

NB Eng and Wales fig is average, weighted unmeas
/ measured pcc, other countrys figs are meas pcc
7
Why the differences ?
  • Between countries the calculation is different.
  • A number of fully metered countries meter whole
    apartment / condominium blocks, not single
    properties.
  • Difference also depends on what one is trying to
    prove!
  • Does England/Wales have one of the highest pcc in
    the world? Not by Ofwat numbers, actually middle
    to low.

8
If metering works as well as we hope, we can
expect
Metering Penetration
PCC
9
(No Transcript)
10
How much water does a meter save?
  • Nobody knows with any certainty.
  • gt20 to lt5 have previously been quoted, 10 is
    now most quoted but
  • Based on optant meter customer typically having
    10 lower pcc than unmeasured customer.
  • BUT this does not necessarily mean they saved 10
    because of meter!!

11
Optants
  • Work from NERA showed optants are low users
    before they opt for a meter.
  • Customers opt for a meter to save money,
    because-
  • They consider they are careful with water
    already, they have low occupancy, their home has
    a high RV
  • Therefore taking lower optant use to be because a
    meter was installed, is very shaky.

12
Measured vs unmeasured pcc
  • Simplistically this should show effect of
    metering, but-
  • 2005/06 range in pcc (l/h/d) over water industry
    (Ofwat)
  • Unmeasured 135.1 to 182.4
  • Measured 116 to 166.3
  • Meters saved from 2.86 to 25.9 in different
    companies

13
Trends in ConsumptionESW Essex area
14
(No Transcript)
15
What do meters really tell us?
  • Quarterly , half yearly or annual property
    consumption. (apart from meter accuracy vs age)
  • What doesnt it tell us
  • Occupancy
  • Lifestyle
  • Customers financial situation or environmental
    awareness.

16
Occupancy is most important
  • A company takes reading of its 100,000 measured
    properties.
  • This gives an annual consumption of 10950 Ml,
    divide by 365 and 100,000 300 l/prop/d.
  • Company A assumes measured occupancy 1.5
    person/house
  • Company B assumes measured occupancy 2.0
    person/house
  • (Both are reasonable Co A high level optants,
    Co B high level new homes)

17
  • Company A.
  • 300 divided by 1.5 measured pcc of 200 l/h/d
  • Company B.
  • 300 divided by 2.0 measured pcc of 150 l/h/d
  • Each difference of 0.1 person/house c10 l/h/d
  • Occupancy assumptions could account for most of
    the variation between Cos. unmeasured/measured
    pcc.

18
Are we double counting in metering debate?
  • Metering 10 ?
  • Water Efficiency 10 ?
  • Tariffs 10 ?
  • Metering Water Efficiency Tariffs 30
  • If it was 30 then current pcc (150) becomes 105
    l/h/d.

19
Minimum pcc for 2 person household
  • (Household of 2 adults, Assume occupied for 365
    days less 4 weeks hols)
  • Fixed Consumptions l/hd/d
  • WC flushing 6/4 l, 1 x 6.5l 4 x 4.5 l /hd
    22.6
  • Washing machine 40 l, 2 times per week 36.9
  • Dishwasher 12 l, 4 times per week 22.2
  • subtotal 81.7
  • Variable Consumptions
  • Hand washing 15 l/hd/d 13.8
  • Showering 1/hd/d _at_ 8 l/min for 4 mins 29.5
  • Cooking, drinking etc 5 l/hd/d 4.6
  • Gardening none 0.0
  • Recycling 3 l/hse/d 1.4
  • Car washing Green so bicycle 0.0
  • subtotal 49.3
  • Total 131l/ppd

20
Profligate pcc for 2 person household
  • (Household of 2 adults, Assume occupied for 365
    days less 4 weeks hols)
  • Fixed Consumptions l/hd/d
  • WC flushing 6/4 l, 1 x 6.5l 4 x 4.5 l /hd
    22.6
  • Washing machine 50 l, 7 times per week
    161.6
  • Dishwasher 15 l, 7 times per week
    48.5
  • subtotal 232.7
  • Variable Consumptions
  • Handwashing 17 l/hd/d 15.7
  • Showering 6/hd/wk _at_ 8 l/min x 6 mins1 bath/wk
    389.8
  • Cooking, drinking etc 10 l/hd/d
    7.4
  • Gardening watering cans 5 hose 5.5 l/hse/d
    4.9
  • Recycling 3 l/hse/d 1.4
  • Car washing 2 cars once/mth 30l
    1.0
  • subtotal 78.2
  • Total 310.9

21
Summary
  • We already have quite a low PCC compared with
    rest of world
  • Meters may be one of the demand management tools
  • We must not confuse potential reductions with
    other iniatives
  • Occupation details are key to PCC
  • What is the starting point?
  • Intelligent Metering may further benefit demand
    management
  • Intelligent Tariffs may be required
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com