Title: EPA's New Directions on Ozone
1EPA's New Directions on Ozone
- Bob Judge
- U.S. EPA - New England
- November 4, 2003
2TOPICS
- Recent Ozone Data and Trends
- 8-hr Ozone Designations
- 8-hr Ozone Implementation
3What is EPAs Revised Ozone Standard?
- In 1997, EPA changed the averaging period of the
standard from 1 hour to 8 hours to better address
health effects from prolonged exposures. - Values of 85 parts per billion (ppb) and above
are exceeding the level of the 8-hour standard. - Compliance with the standard is based on a 3-year
average of the 4th highest ozone concentration at
each monitor.
4(No Transcript)
5What is the 8-hour Ozone Trend?
68-hr Ozone Designations
7Designation Schedule
- July 15, 2003 - States submit initial 8-hour
recommendations, based on 2000-2002 data - November, 2003 - EPA responds to States with any
modifications (EPA must respond by December 15,
2003) - April 15, 2004 - Promulgate 8-hour ozone
designations
8Design Values in Northern New England(Based on
2000-2002 data)
9Design Values in Southern New England (Based on
2000-2002 data)
10March 28, 2000 Boundary Guidance
- Counties with violating monitors and nearby
contributing areas should be part of
nonattainment area. - The Metropolitan Statistical Area or the
Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area
(C/MSA) serve as the presumptive boundary for
8-hour nonattainment areas (or 1-hour
nonattainment area, if larger). - States recommending nonattainment boundaries less
than a C/MSA must document its rationale and
address certain factors identified by EPA, such
as population, traffic and commuting patterns,
projected growth, prevailing meteorology, nearby
sources and air quality.
118-hour Nonattainment AreasRecommended by States
in 2003
Governors recommendations are based on 2000-2002
data.
12Connecticuts Recommendation
13Rhode Islands Recommendation
14Massachusetts Recommendation
15Maines Recommendation
16New Hampshires Recommendation
17EPA Response to New England State Recommendations
- EPA will respond to each state in the near
future. - EPA unlikely to raise issues with the New England
state recommendations
188-hr Ozone Implementation Guidance
19Current Schedule
20Important Implementation Rule Topics
- Nonattainment area classification approaches
- Attainment dates for nonattainment areas
- How EPA will transition from 1-hr to 8-hr ozone
- standard
- Requirements to prevent backsliding
- Reasonable Further Progress
- Modeling attainment demonstration requirements
21Classifications and Attainment Dates
- EPAs preferred option for classifications from
June 2003 proposal - Areas with 1-hour design values lt 0.121 ppm,
would be regulated under subpart 1 of the CAA.
There would be no classification scheme.
Attainment dates would generally be 5 yrs from
designation, but can obtain additional 5 year
extension. - Areas with 1-hour design values gt 0.121 ppm,
would be regulated under subpart 2 of the CAA.
These type of areas would receive subpart 2
classifications (e.g., marginal, moderate, etc.)
according to their 8-hr ozone design value.
22 Table of Translated 8-Hour Design Values
23Reopening of Public Comment Period Regarding
Classifications
- Concerns expressed about possible unequal
treatment between nonattainment areas with same
8-hour design values (e.g., some would be in
Subpart 1, while others in Subpart 2) - Concern about unrealistically early attainment
dates for some areas - EPA reopened the public comment period on Oct.
21, 2003 (68 FR 60054) with two alternative
classification approaches relative to EPAs
initial preferred approach. - Comments due November 5, 2003
24Reopening of Public Comment Period Regarding
Classifications
- Proposed Alternative A
- - Translate the 0.121 ppm 1-hour value in the CAA
to an equivalent 8-hour value (approx. 0.091
ppm), and shrink classification bands above 0.091
ppm by 50. Areas with 8-hour design values of
0.091 ppm and above would be classified under
subpart 2. - Areas with 8-hour design values below 0.091ppm
would be under subpart 1.
25Reopening of Public Comment Period Regarding
Classifications
- Proposed Alternative B
- Shrink classification bands above 0.085 ppm by
50, resulting in lower 8-hour design values
having a higher classification and longer
attainment date. - All areas with 1-hour design values greater than
0.121 ppm would be classified under subpart 2
based on its 8-hour design value. - All areas with 8-hour design values greater than
0.091 ppm will be classified under subpart 2
based on its 8-hour design value. - All other areas (i.e., areas with 1-hr DVs of
less than 0.121 ppm and 8-hr DVs of less than
0.091 ppm) would be under subpart 1.
26 Alternative Classifications Table
27Revocation of the 1-hour Standard
- EPA likely to revoke the 1-hour ozone standard in
April, 2005. - As part of the revocation, EPA may retain 1-hour
ozone designations and classifications for those
obligations that would provide benefits for
attainment of the 8-hour standard. - The 1-hour standard would not be retained for the
1-hour Rate of Progress and attainment plans, or
for conformity analyses of the 1-hour standard
after the conformity requirements for the 8-hour
standard begin to apply.
28Anti-backsliding
- Subpart 2 applicable requirements in current
1-hr ozone nonattainment areas (e.g., I/M
programs, RACT, stage II) would remain applicable
after 1-hr standard is revoked. - States may be able to discontinue programs once
area achieves level of 1-hr standard. - State would have to show that elimination of a
program doesnt interfere with attainment of the
8-hr standard.
29Reasonable Further Progress
- Proposal covers several issues, including
- Requirement for 15 VOC reductions in first 6
years - 2002 baseline year for starting (See recent EPA
memo) - Timing of RFP reductions relative to 2010
attainment date for moderate areas - Timing of submission of RFP plan (2006 for 15/
first 6 years ROP, 2007 for additional ROP/
Subpart 1 RFP) - CAA requirements for creditability of control
measures (Most reductions after 2002 are
creditable.)
30Reasonable Further Progress
- For subpart 2 areas, should VOC emission
reductions alone be required for the initial 15
percent progress period? - Option 1. Continue to require 15 percent VOC
reductions within 6 years of base year from all
moderate and above 8-hour ozone nonattainment
areas. After 6 years for moderate areas, RFP
under subpart 1. - Option 2. (Preferred approach) Exempt areas
that have approved 15 percent plans under the
1-hour ozone standard from an additional 15
percent VOC-only requirement. Moderate areas are
held to RFP under subpart 1.
31Modeling Attainment Demonstration
- Areas with attainment dates beyond 2007 will need
to submit attainment demonstrations to EPA in
2007. - An attainment demonstration SIP consists of
- technical analyses which identify the sources of
emissions that are causing violations, - identification of the VOC and NOx emissions
reductions needed to provide for attainment by
the areas attainment date, and - adopted measures that provide for those
reductions.
32Future Programs That Will Address Ozone
- EPA and the states have implemented a wide
variety of control strategies to reduce VOC and
NOx emissions. - Future strategies include
- Tier 2/sulfur gasoline program for new cars and
light-duty trucks starting 2004 - 2004 and 2007 NOx limits for heavy-duty diesel
- The NOx SIP Call starting 2003/2004
- Federal non-road standards (rules for diesel
equipment, lawn and garden equipment, marine
engines, locomotives). Tighter non-road diesel
standards just proposed.
33Next Steps on 8-hour Ozone Implementation
- Respond to State nonattainment recommendation -
November, 2003 - Finalize 8-hour Ozone Implementation Rule -
Early, 2004 - Designate and classify 8-hour areas - April 15,
2004 - State Ozone SIPs due - May, 2007
- (Note Some SIP requirements due May, 2006)
- Attainment dates Some time between 2007 and
2017 in the Northeast depending on classification
34For Further Information
- www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ozone/o3imp8hr/
- www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/glo/designations
- Contact Bob Judge at 617-918-1045, or
judge.robert_at_epa.gov