Diapositive 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositive 1

Description:

Nonlinear performance comparison for FD and PD SOI MOSFETs based on the ... Methods: quid for large amplitude? VG. ID. t. Taylor: add terms = too complicated ! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: parv2
Category:
Tags: diapositive | quid

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositive 1


1
(No Transcript)
2
Why study SOI MOSFETs nonlinearities ?
Distortion
Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI)
  • Non-idealities of linear circuits
  • Amplifiers
  • Active filters
  • Used in some applications
  • Mixers
  • Oscillators
  • Frequency multipliers
  • Inherent to the physics of semiconductors

3
FD vs PD SOI MOSFETs
ID mA
- Fully Depleted (FD)
-- Partially Depleted (PD) with floating body
VD V
DuTs FD and PD SOI MOSFETs, 12x6.6 µm/0.25 µm
(0.25 µm LETI technology)
4
What happens inside?- gd kink -

n
p
n

Body region
SiO2
Depletion region
5
Linearity of SOI MOSFETs using Integral Function
Method and Volterra modeling
gt Does the kink influence the linearity ?
gt Which methods to characterize the linearity of
MOSFETs ??
The simplest is the best
6
Method Taylor analysis
Consider the memoryless nonlinear system
Taylor series
7
Methods quid for large amplitude?
ID
VG
Taylor add terms gt too complicated
! IFM good approximation of HD at LF further
advantage less sensitive too measurement
noise CerdeiraSSE02, CerdeiraSSE04,
CerdeiraICSICT04
8
IFM How does it work ?
Out
1. Normalize the characteristics
In
HD3 is obtained by computing the D function of
Ir I(V)-I(-V) gt even harmonics eliminated
! HD of order higher than 3 are neglected
CerdeiraSSE02, CerdeiraICSICT04
9
IFM takes the influence of the amplitude of the
applied signal into account
HD3 dB
VG V
Not by a scale factor as from Taylor approach,
cfr.
10
Comparison with LSNA measurements
900 MHz, 50 O, A 0.2 V
  • Good agreement before the minimum
  • Minimum located at
  • - IFM max. of gm
  • - LSNA max. of power gain
  • Nonlinearity of gm and gd

LSNA
HD2 dB
gm and gd
gm only
VG V
11
Harmonic distortion af HF
DC method vs 900 MHz measurements in agreements
gt Which frequency limit ??
12
HD from Nonlinear current method
ParvaisGAAS04
13
Poles of HD2 and HD3 as a function of ZL
14
Characterization methods
  • Good agreements between results calculated using
    IFM and using Fourier coefficients.
  • IFM advantages amplitude dependent, no
    derivatives.
  • Frequency validity range cfr. Volterra model
    (several GHz).

15
HD PD FD transistors
16
Frequency analysis of the kink effect
SinitskyIEDL97
  • As Vd ? Rb ? gt fc ?

17
Third order intermodulation
Volterra model
ZL?
18
PD SOI Floating body or not ?
PD, from ST Microelectronics 60x 1µm/0.12 µm, f2
GHz
FB higher fT, fmax than BC and isoc. BC/Isoc.
parasitic C, gm degradation
19
Conclusions
  • At 900 MHz, when the polarization voltage is
    varied, HD is dominated by the DC I-V
    characteristics.
  • Frequency validity range of DC methods provided
    by a Volterra model.
  • PD versus FD
  • HD ---gt idem (gm dominates)
  • IMD ---gt depends on the tone separation
  • cfr. Kink effect
  • Thanks to
  • FRIA for financial support
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com