Different Oxygen extraction methods were considered: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Different Oxygen extraction methods were considered:

Description:

high concentration of silicates in the lunar regolith (~45%) relatively high efficiency ... Sifting: Get rid of massive chunks of regolith. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: GeorgiaKa4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Different Oxygen extraction methods were considered:


1
A basic introduction to Molten Silicate
electrolysis
  • Different Oxygen extraction methods were
    considered

2
A basic introduction to Molten Silicate
electrolysis
  • Molten silicate (SiO2) electrolysis advantages
    over the other reactions
  • normal reducing agents not available on the moon
    gt electrolysis
  • high concentration of silicates in the lunar
    regolith (45)
  • relatively high efficiency
  • ease of separation of oxygen (just melt it, and
    then electrolyze it!)
  • Disadvantages
  • high temperatures and high power required for
    reaction to take place

3
A closer (more detailed) look to the reaction
Cathode Reactions

Anode Reaction
Reaction T 1400-1450C Reaction P Lunar
atmosphere gt vacuum
4
Original procedure outline
  • Sifting Get rid of massive chunks of regolith.
  • Conductivity separation chamber Use of this
    separation technique has been reconsidered
    looking into spectroscopy instead.
  • Reaction chamber
  • Oxygen Separation
  • Oxygen Analyzer For analysis purposes.
  • Oxygen collection chamber Compress and store
    produced oxygen.

5
Modified procedure outline
6
A. Sifting chamber
  • The idea behind it
  • To get rid of massive chunks of regolith
  • We have feed-thrus with small cross sections we
    dont want big chunks to get stuck in them and
    clog them
  • Also considering variation of mineral
    consentration vs. grain size that could
    potentially affect our process efficiency
  • ? Big chunks take longer to melt, use up too much
    power might not even end up melting during our
    reaction procedure

7
B. Conductivity separation chamber
  • Initially, the idea behind it
  • We only wanted to heat up soil that will give us
    O2. Energy should not be used up in heating up
    soil that will not melt or electrolyze, since it
    will not serve the purpose of oxygen extraction.
  • The process required heating soil to 700C to
    increase conductivity
  • Due to heating, gases mostly H2,
    H2O, CF4 (from solar wind, etc) that are in lunar
    soil are liberated)
  • However
  • ! After investigating
    conductivities for silicates and
  • O2-rich substances on
    the moon,
  • we concluded that this process
  • will not cause any considerable
  • increase in overall O2 production
  • efficiency

Alternative method
8
B. Alternative method to Conductivity
separationSoil Spectroscopy
  • The idea behind it
  • O2-rich substances on the moon that melt within
    a lower temperature range (1400-1450C) and
    efficiently give out oxygen, can be identified by
    the wavelengths they reflect when undergoing
    spectroscopy.
  • These wavelengths are differentiated enough
    between different substances, and the substances
    are scattered on the moon surface in such a way
    that they allow for spectroscopy to be used for
    selectively acquiring the right type of soil for
    our process.
  • The process
  • Will require a spectroscope attached to the
    mechanical arm which will scan lunar soil and
    identify regions with desired type of soil
  • Through a controller, the mechanical arm will
    only be allowed to pick up that soil that is
    desired for greater efficiency

9
C. Reaction chamber
This is where the reaction takes place! I.e.,
where the soil (mainly silicates) is heated up to
melting point, and then electrolysis occurs,
giving out oxygen
Remember T 1400-1450C P vacuum
Also, at this point we want to be able to get rid
of all the processed material, after the reaction
is completed (Waste disposal, which is what the
valve is for)
10
C. Initial Reaction chamber setup
Most probable heating element materials tungsten
Also changing the geometry to coil
11
C. Reaction chamber - Electrodes
  • The idea behind it
  • We used the cylindrical shape (cathode surrounds
    anode) to allow collecting the O2 that is
    produced on the anode and transferring it outside
    the chamber

Initial setup
Electrodes embedded throughout the whole volume
of the fluid
Possible anodes considered
Iridium or Pt
Possible cathodes considered C or Pt with Fe-Si
coating
Modified (new) setup More surface area
(total) Only one opening for heat to escape Can
afford losing one electrode to clogging No need
for stirring viscous fluid
Problems we are facing Accumulation of Si, and
formation of Si-Pt alloy on cathode, which could
potentially clog/destroy the electrode
12
C. Reaction chamber Electrodes (new setup)
Modified (new) setup More surface area
(total) Only one opening for heat to escape Can
afford losing one electrode to clogging No need
for stirring viscous fluid
Electrodes embedded throughout the whole volume
of the fluid
13
C. Reaction chamber Insulation initial design
  • The idea behind it
  • Heat loss prevents from reaching the temperature
    we need for reaction to take place.
  • Since we have power limits, we need to save as
    much heat as we can
  • Heat loss is both due to
  • conduction and radiation
  • (Radiated heat sT4)
  • Initial design (on the left) has
    been reconsidered
  • New design more radiation shielding

14
C. Reaction chamber Insulation new design
New design more radiation shielding, more
vacuum, less solid contact
Possible container materials Tantalum, or
Molybdenum Mo forms an oxide that evaporates
easily Possible reflective layers Al, Au, Ag,
or Pt Possible insulator materials Alumina
(Al2O3), or Zirconia (ZO2) stabilized with
Yttria (Y2O3)
15
D. Oxygen separation chamber
  • The idea behind it
  • Along with O2, other gases could potentially
    escape our reaction chamber
  • Our goal is to extract O2, so we have to separate
    those gases out
  • The diagram on the left depicts an O2 separator
    it uses membranes that are selectively permeable
    to O2 works with low-P gas and T700C

Cerametic Inc. Ion Transport Membrane Cost
10,000
16
E. Gas analyzers/O2 sensor
  • The idea behind it
  • After we separate the O2, we want to
    see what efficiency we have by looking at purity
    of O2
  • If we know volume, we can calculate
    the O2 produced
  • Also, we can see if any O2 is lost in previous
    stages

17
F. Oxygen collecting chamber
  • The idea behind it
  • Condense O2 by cooling it down and store it or
    compress it (use small, efficient compressor).

Havent started working on it yet!!!!
18
A few more notes
The valves that we are using for our reaction
chamber for disposal have to be able to withstand
the temperature of the molten silicates, as well
as be non-corrosive to them. The valves that we
are using for our reaction chamber for O2
transfer have to be able to withstand the
temperature of the O2 gas, as well as be
non-corrosive to it. For cooling mechanism, we
will try to find a low P, low m compressor.
19
If you have any questions, send an EMAIL to
gkaragio_at_fit.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com