Fossils: Pictures of the Past - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Fossils: Pictures of the Past

Description:

For centuries, people had noticed images of plants and animal remains in stones ... In China, people sometimes found 'dragon bones' (fossils bones of ancient ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:404
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: WOU1
Learn more at: https://people.wou.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fossils: Pictures of the Past


1
Fossils Pictures of the Past
  • A tale of discoveries and hoaxes

2
Figured Stones
  • For centuries, people had noticed images of
    plants and animal remains in stones and wondered
    at them.
  • In China, people sometimes found dragon bones
    (fossils bones of ancient animals) which were
    used to make medicine.
  • Tongue stones (fossil sharks teeth) were known
    in Italy as curiosities.

3
Fossil
  • The term fossil in 16th and 17th century Europe
    referred to just about anything dug from the
    earth crystals, interesting mineral concretions,
    metal ores, and the figured stones that today
    are called fossils.

4
Early European theories
  • The rise of the Enlightenment brought new ideas
    about figured stones
  • Did they grow from seeds or eggs trapped in
    rocks?
  • Were they remains of victims of the Biblical
    flood?
  • Were they organic at all?

5
Early theorists
  • Robert Hooke, John Ray, and Leonardo DaVinci all
    wrote about fossils, believing fossils to be the
    remains of once-living things.
  • Others, such as Athanasius Kircher (17th century)
    attributed fossils such as tongue stones to a
    lapidifying virtue through the whole body of the
    geocosm.

6
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519)
  • In addition to his work as an artist, da Vinci
    was also a philosopher (scientist), inventor,
    and writer.
  • Several of da Vincis observations on geology and
    fossils were remarkably modern.

7
Horizontal Strata
  • da Vinci observed horizontal rock strata and
    correlated layers on opposite sides of river
    valleys in and around the Alps.
  • He correctly surmised that the layers had been
    laid down at the same time and that the rivers
    had sawn through them.

8
River deposition
  • da Vinci observed and recorded that rivers
    deposit large, angular rocks near their sources
    high in the mountains.
  • Rocks that are transported by the rivers are worn
    down and rounded. Further downstream, deposited
    rocks grow smaller and smaller as the heaver
    rocks drop out of slower currents, until at the
    mouth of a river, there are only particles of
    silt, sand, or clay.

9
Fossils and strata
  • da Vinci observed clam fossils on mountaintops in
    the Alps, and was perhaps the first to propose
    that the rocks had once been sea floor.
  • He also proposed that where layers bearing
    different fossils had been laid down at different
    times.

10
Fossils as organic remains
  • da Vinci observed that in living clams, the
    shells remain closed by a strong muscle, while in
    dead clams, the muscle relaxes and quickly
    decays, allowing the shells to fall open and
    disarticulate.
  • From this observation, he proposed that clam
    fossils with closed shells were the remains of
    clams that had been trapped alive in silt.

11
Steno (Niels Stensen, 1638-1686)
  • Danish anatomist, studied medicine in the
    Netherlands and France.
  • Came to Florence at the request of the Duke of
    Tuscany to run a hospital and continue his
    research.

12
Steno and the Shark
  • 1666 Fishermen in Livorno, Italy, caught a giant
    shark. The local duke had it shipped to Steno for
    study.
  • Steno noticed similarities between the sharks
    teeth and tongue stones that were well known at
    the time.

13
Stenos leap
  • Like some others of his time, Steno thought that
    sharks teeth could be organic remains.
  • However, Steno took it one step further, saying
    that the fossils that looked like sharks teeth
    really were sharks teeth, and were the remains
    of once-living sharks.

14
Corpuscle Theory of Matter
  • Steno used the Corpuscle Theory of Matter to
    explain the transformation of sharks teeth into
    tongue stones.
  • Naturalists of the day hypothesized that matter
    was made of corpuscles (essentially molecules).
    Steno suggested that the corpuscles of the teeth
    had been gradually replaced by corpuscles of
    stone as the teeth sat in the rocks.

15
But how did they get there?
  • The obvious question, then, was how did sharks
    teeth end up in rocks on dry land?
  • Stenos Principle of Original Horizontality
    Rocks once existed in a fluid state. Rock strata
    are formed when particles in a flud such as water
    fell to the bottom of the body of water, leaving
    horizontal layers. Later disturbances may alter
    the horizontality.

16
Law of Superposition
  • Steno reasoned that if rocks were deposited in
    layers, animal and plant remains could be trapped
    in those layers. Later disturbances could push
    rock layers above the waters surface.
  • The oldest fossils should be found in the lowest
    layers. Younger fossils would be found in younger
    layers.

17
Johann Beringer (d. 1740)
  • Dr. Johann Bartholomew Adam Beringer, professor
    of Medicine in Würtzburg, lectured widely on
    fossils.
  • Some, he stated, could be the remains of
    once-living organisms. Most, he thought, were the
    handiwork of God.
  • Beringers arrogance may have been the impetus
    for one of the best-known fossil hoaxes in
    history.

18
The Figured Stones of Würtzburg
  • In 1726, Beringer published Lithographia
    Wirceburgensis, a catalog of fossils he and his
    assistants had unearthed near his home.
  • God, the founder of Nature, would fill our minds
    with His praises and perfections radiating from
    these wondrous effects, so that, when forgetful
    men grow silent, these mute stones might speak
    with the eloquence of their figures.

19
The Figured Stones of Würtzburg
20
Figured stones?
  • Some critics who examined the stones were quick
    to point out that they bore the marks of a
    chisel.
  • Beringers response ...the figures..are so
    exactly fitted to the dimensions of the stones,
    that one would swear that they are the work of a
    very meticulous sculptor... and seem to bear
    unmistakable indications of the sculptors
    knife... One would swear that he discerned in
    many of them the strokes of a knife gone awry,
    and superfluous gouges in several directions.
    Beringer believed the sculptor was God, and the
    stones showed that God was practicing His skills.

21
More stones
  • Some figured stones even bore Hebrew letters,
    spelling out the name of God.
  • Beringer took these as possible signs that the
    stones were the work of the Creator, but also
    suggested they could be sports of nature formed
    by the plastic power of the earth, or that some
    that resembled living things might grow from
    trapped seeds or eggs.

22
But whose hand?
  • Two of Beringers detractors, Ignatz Roderick and
    Georg von Eckart, admitted to carving and
    planting the stones themselves.
  • Beringer at first accused the men of professional
    jealousy, but a public trial revealed that the
    men had committed the hoax.
  • Beringer offered to buy back copies of his book
    that had been sold. However, after his death, his
    publisher brought out a second edition for the
    curious and those with a sense of humor.

23
Discussion
  • Consider the century in which Beringer lived, and
    views of fossils at the time. Why was he so quick
    to believe the stones were real, and willing to
    support a supernatural explanation for the
    stones?
  • In Beringers work, he proposed a classification
    scheme, asked questions, posed multiple
    hypotheses about the origin of the stones, and
    invited discussion. In this, how did the quality
    of his work compare to that of Steno and da Vinci?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com