Title: Transparency Review: Outcomes and Implications
1Transparency Review Outcomes and Implications
Professor David Westbury Vice Principal,
University of Birmingham. Chair, Joint Costing
and Pricing Steering Group.
2Joint Costing Pricing Steering Group
- U Uk
- SCOP
- U Scotland
- HHEW
3Role of JCPSG
- To advise universities and colleges on the
development of good practice in Costing and
Pricing. - To encourage the integration of Financial and
Academic decision making.
4JCPSG Web-site
http//www.jcpsg.ac.uk
5Transparency ReviewObjectives of Review
- to ensure transparency of costs of publicly
funded research - to ensure coherence of the dual support funding
streams, mutually reinforcing - to ensure that public funds are being spent cost
effectively - to improve clarity over respective
responsibilities of FC RCs
6The Transparency ReviewUnderstanding the Problem
- In the past, focused on allocation of income to
activities, not the distribution of costs. - Not able to answer the value for money
question, particularly for research. - Can we manage ourselves effectively?
- Confidence of stakeholders?
7(No Transcript)
8Transparency Review Reporting in July 2001
Hefce 95 of institutions Shefc
100 of institutions HefcW 92 of
institutions NI 100 of institutions
9Results by ActivityAggregate of 9 Institutions
PF T NPF T PF R NPF R O Income 457 115
391 157 323 Costs 478 72 521
211 238 (Deficit/surplus (21) 43 (130)
(56) 85 (Deficit)/surplus (5) 37 (33)
(36) 26 As of income 1998-99 informal
data
10Qualitative Messages
- PF and NPF research in deficit, i.e. full costs
exceed income that can be attributed to them - PF teaching is in deficit, though this is not
large - No evidence that public funds being used to
subsidise non publicly funded activities - Other activities making contribution to funding
publicly funded activities
11Core Management Processes
Institutional Plan Targets Finance etc.
Academic Capital Plans
Costing Pricing
Procurement
Marketing
Administration
Sales
Facilities Management
Management Information
Monitoring
12Where are we now?
Transparency Review
13(No Transcript)