What Would Jesus Say to Richard Dawkins - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

What Would Jesus Say to Richard Dawkins

Description:

Taught in United States from 1967-69. Returned to be a lecturer at Oxford. ... 'at best sophomoric, but that would be unfair to sophomores. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: dcox
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What Would Jesus Say to Richard Dawkins


1
What Would Jesus Say toRichard Dawkins
  • Genesis 11

2
(No Transcript)
3
Background
  • Born in Nairobi, Kenya in 1941.
  • Moved back to England in 1949.
  • Raised as an Anglican.
  • Eventually became an atheist.

4
Background
  • Studies zoology.
  • First degree in 1962.
  • Completed MA and PhD degrees at Oxford in 1966.

5
Background
  • Taught in United States from 1967-69.
  • Returned to be a lecturer at Oxford.
  • 1995 appointed first one to hold the Charles
    Simonyi Professor of Public Understanding of
    Science at Oxford.

6
The God Delusion
  • Has become antagonistic to any form of religion.
  • He says he wrote the book to persuade people to
    become atheists and for atheists to find the
    nerve to come out of the closet.

7
You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • He seeks to pit science against religion.
  • He says people who believe in the supernatural
    are deluded.
  • He believes Darwinism has given us a
    comprehensive explanation for the origin and
    development of everything.

8
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • While the world may appear designed, it is not.
  • Natural selection explains the growth, diversity,
    and complexity of life.
  • There is no mystery in the universe or any need
    for God to explain anything.

9
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • How do we analyze a book or argument?
  • What is the argument?
  • What is the method?
  • Is the method sound?
  • Did the writer defend his argument well?
  • What are the strengths/weaknesses?
  • How would you rate the book/argument?

10
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • a. He denies to others what he finally admits.
  • Most scientists know and admit the limits of
    science - even atheistic scientists.
  • Stephen J. Gould.

11
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • a. He denies others
  • He questions Goulds integrity.
  • I simply do not believe that Gould could
    possibly have meant what he wrote in Rocks of
    Ages

12
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • a. He denies to others what he finally admits.
  • Perhaps there are some genuinely profound and
    meaningful questions that are forever beyond the
    reach of science.

13
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • b. He does not follow his own suggested method.
  • His book is short on science.
  • Alvin Plantinga.
  • Dawkins makes many unsubstantiated statements.

14
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • c. He doesnt acknowledge that his science
    rests on faith.
  • Dawkins tells us the only way to have true
    knowledge is through a rational approach that
    uses the scientific method.
  • You cant use the scientific method to verify his
    contention.

15
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • c. He doesnt acknowledge
  • Throughout the book he relates how much we have
    been fooled over time in what we perceive.
  • How can we be sure he is not fooled?

16
1. You Are Not Honest aboutScience
  • Foundationally, he operates by faith.

17
2. You Are Not Informed aboutReligion
  • He interacts with philosophy, religion,
    psychology and other areas in this work.
  • His two big targets in religion are Islam and
    Christianity.

18
2. You Are Not Informed aboutReligion
  • He presents God in the OT as evil.
  • He questions Jesus existence.
  • He argues the gospels came late and are
    unreliable.
  • He argues Jesus would not have wanted Paul to
    take the message to Gentiles.
  • Calls the cross a repellant doctrine.

19
2. You Are Not Informed aboutReligion
  • Plantinga on his foray into philosophy.
  • at best sophomoric, but that would be unfair to
    sophomores.
  • When it comes to religion that would be too kind.

20
2. You Are Not Informed aboutReligion
  • Much of his critique is based on 19th and 20th
    century works that are dismissed today.
  • Any one who is informed is embarrassed for him in
    the ignorance he displays.

21
2. You Are Not Informed aboutReligion
  • Two Things
  • He fails to acknowledge much good that is done in
    and through religion.
  • He fails to understand that God is Spirit and
    that classical theology argues for His simplicity.

22
3. You Are Not Honest aboutAtheism
  • He is antagonistic regarding religion.
  • He is optimistic regarding atheism.
  • He argues that if his view held the day the world
    would be a better and safer place.

23
3. You Are Not Honest aboutAtheism
  • The biggest atrocities of the 20th century were
    committed by atheists.
  • For evil to be objectively real, God must exist.

24
Closing Thoughts
  • 1. The movement in the world, even in academia is
    toward God.
  • Atheism is a philosophy in retreat.
  • Anthony Flew.

25
(No Transcript)
26
Closing Thoughts
  • 2. The persistence of belief even in highly
    educated societies is a big problem for atheists.
  • 3. Christians are found across the scientific
    spectrum. We are not bound by one view. We can be
    open to the evidence.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com