Title: Smaller egov case studies: Rushcliffe, Swale
1Smaller e-gov case studies Rushcliffe, Swale
2Where were we?
- Each office dealt with its own and avoided "not
me" - Because a new officer is involved, customers must
repeat where they'd got to with their transaction
last time. - Delivery channels (visit, letter /email, phone,
web) were handled separately /differently - Didn't handle /route partner transactions
- Paper heavy processing
- Costs higher than they need be
- (Rushcliffe) one major office - several reception
points - differing standards / need for customer
to navigate from one reception to another -
confusing and over complex
3Where have we got to? 1 of 4 - single front
office function, handling
- (Swale) 80 services, 50 by volume of
transactions. - (Rushcliffe) all revsbens, housing allocations,
most environmental transactions, bins, waste,
abandoned vehicles, allotments, housing
grants,cleansing, grounds maintenance, taxi
other licensing, electoral registration, some
planning applications. Housing is no longer run
by the Council, leisure services manage their own
contacts. - Sell on" other services.
- Can we help you with anything else eg one bulk
waste leads to the son-in-laws fridge. - Means longer transaction time but worth it
4Where have we got to? 2 of 4 - technology
- Front and back office (mostly) integrated.
- CRM, ACD
- (Swale) provision of Internet access to remote
areas, tackling social exclusion - Northgate integrated systems.
- Community based web portal
- Using PDAs in the field (eg housing rant
assessments) - (Rushcliffe) FAQs via Intranet
- (Now) introducing on-line forms - more accurate
form completion - less errors - less re-work
5Where have we got to? 3 of 4 - call centre
operation
(Swale) time to transact - just over 2 mins.
Abandoned calls less than 3. Customer
satisfaction from 76 to 98 (Rushcliffe) 12 seat
call centre, also handles 400 Visits, letters,
emails per day Made efficiency savings. Improved
quality of service through effective technology
and changed staff attitudes
6Where have we got to? 4 of 4 working with
others in the public sector
- (Swale) Kent fire service use front office to
report abandoned vehicles direct from cabs
community portal - links to Kent County Council - (Rushcliffe) County wide portal (soon) will give
access to others services, will include CMS
7How did we get here? 1 of 4
- CEX
- Lead the project
- Is the project sponsor
- Chairs the project board
- Project management is by pragmatic PRINCE2
8How did we get here? 2 of 4 overcoming
opposition (Rushcliffe)
- There was opposition
- From staff "my job is threatened
- From heads of service "not how we do things round
here, skills transfer can't happen, contact
centre isn't competent in our highly professional
areas". - Overcome by
- CEX leads (and some heads did get banged
together) - Kept everyone informed, staff consultations
- Before each transaction type was added, did BPR
- Such as customer service week showed high
standard of service to other staff /managers
they could listen in to calls / observe
front-desk service
9How did we get here? 3 of 4 change management
principles (Swale)
- Who does it effect? The entire organisation
- Re-structuring around customer needs
- Cultural change to embed customer focus
- Business process change Job re-designing
- Up skilling front office, down skilling back
office - Actively seek and act on feedback
- Strategy? Determine corporate strategy first
- Must be a business driven programme
- Technology used to enable changes, not to drive
them - Communication? Only when you are sick of hearing
yourself will the message have only just got
though
10How did we get here? 4 of 4 change management
principles (Swale)
- Delivery?
- Ensure senior management ownership.
- Business process mapping yields big improvements
but time consuming, resistance to change - Track savings and changes to organisations
culture, structure, customer/stakeholder
satisfaction - Use existing skills within the organisation
- Where does it end? Never ending
11Lessons learnt?
- Senior Management ownership vital, which was
there - Didn't appreciate the peakiness of volumes had
to learn how to handle peaks by implementing
unusual work patterns - Performance measurement and performance
management could have been better. It now is - Process mapping takes time and training
- Must always look for the savings
- Existing skills in the organisation find them,
use them - Didnt push enough on need to improve the
service not the status quo
12Next?
- Will introduce more transactions and services
- Will introduce authentication where needed
- Will introduce case based reasoning systems
which will reduce further tx handled by back
office professionals - Need to continue developing the Kent partnership
citizens dont know who provided which services
13- Josie McGuirk, Deputy CEX and head of policy
performance "the knowledge, skill and dedication
of the contact centre staff who came from many
walks of life and many roles in the council is
impressive - coupled with good systems it means
the service is much better and consistently so. - Chris Edwards, Swale Chief executive We have
achieved a state of true continuous improvement,
the culture has changed, the customer is at the
forefront of everything. We are searching for new
ways of stakeholder satisfaction. This is the
future of Local Government