5.6 Indirect Proof - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

5.6 Indirect Proof

Description:

... have used the Laws of Syllogism and Detachment to obtain conclusions directly. In this lesson, you will study indirect proofs. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:829
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Robert1130
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 5.6 Indirect Proof


1
5.6 Indirect Proof Inequalities in Two Triangles
  • Geometry
  • Mrs. Spitz
  • Fall 2004

2
Objectives
  • Read and write an indirect proof
  • Use the Hinge Theorem and its Converse to compare
    side lengths and angle measures.

3
Assignment
  • pp. 305-306 1-24 all

4
Using Indirect Proof
  • Up to now, all the proofs have used the Laws of
    Syllogism and Detachment to obtain conclusions
    directly. In this lesson, you will study
    indirect proofs. An indirect proof is a proof in
    which you prove that a statement is true by first
    assuming that its opposite is true. If this
    assumption leads to an impossibility, then you
    have proved that the original statement is true.

5
Ex. 1 Using Indirect Proof
  • Use an indirect proof to prove that a triangle
    cannot have more than one obtuse angle.
  • SOLUTION
  • Given ? ?ABC
  • Prove ??ABC does not have more than one obtuse
    triangle

6
Ex. 1 Using Indirect Proof
  • Step 1 Begin by assuming that ?ABC does have
    more than one obtuse angle.
  • m?A gt 90 and m?B gt 90 Assume ?ABC has two
    obtuse angles.
  • m?A m?B gt 180 Add the two given inequalities.
  • Step 2 You know however, that the sum of all
    the measures of all three angles is 180.
  • m?A m?B m?C 180 Triangle Sum Theorem
  • m?A m?B 180 - m?C Subtraction Property of
    Equality

Step 3 So, you can substitute 180 - m?C for
m?A m?B in m?A m?B gt 180 180 - m?C gt 180
Substitution Property of Equality 0 gt m?C
Simplify
7
IMPOSSIBLE WHICH IS WHAT WE WANT
  • The last statement is not possible angle
    measures in triangles cannot be negative.
  • ?So, you can conclude that the original statement
    must be false. That is, ?ABC cannot have more
    than one obtuse triangle.

8
Guidelines for writing an Indirect Proof
  • Identify the statement that you want to prove is
    false.
  • Begin by assuming the statement is false assume
    its opposite is true.
  • Obtain statements that logically follow from your
    assumption.
  • If you obtain a contradiction, then the original
    statement must be true.

9
Objective 2 Using the Hinge Theorem
  • In the two triangles shown, notice that AB ? DE
    and BC ? EF, but m?B is greater than m?E.
  • It appears that the side opposite the 122 angle
    is longer than the side opposite the 85 angle.
    This relationship is guaranteed by the Hinge
    Theorem.

122
85
10
Theorem 5.14 Hinge Theorem
  • If two sides of one triangle are congruent to two
    sides of another triangle, and the included angle
    of the first is larger than the included angle of
    the second, then the third side of the first
    triangle is longer than the third side of the
    second triangle.
  • RT gt VX

80
100
11
Theorem 5.15 Converse of the Hinge Theorem
  • If two sides of one triangle are congruent to two
    sides of another triangle, and the third side of
    the first is longer than the third side of the
    second, then the included angle of the first is
    larger than the included angle of the second.
  • m?A gt m?D

12
Ex. 2 Indirect Proof of Theorem 5.15
  • GIVEN AB ? DE
  • BC ? EF
  • AC gt DF
  • PROVE m? B gt m?E
  • Solution Begin by assuming that m? gt m?E. Then
    it follows that either m ?B m ?E or m ?B lt m ?E.

13
Indirect Proof continued
  • Case 1 If m?B m?E, then ?B ? ?E. So, ?ABC ?
    ?DEF by the SAS Congruence Postulate and AC DF.
  • Case 2 m?B lt ?E, then AC lt DF by the Hinge
    Theorem.
  • Both conclusions contradict the given information
    that AC gt DF. So, the original assumption that
    m?B gt m?E cannot be correct. Therefore, m?B gt
    m?E.

14
Ex. 3 Finding Possible Side Lengths and Angle
Measures
  • You can use the Hinge Theorem and its converse to
    choose possible side lengths or angle measures
    from a given list.
  • AB ? DE, BC ? EF, AC 12 inches, m?B 36, and
    m?E 80. Which of the following is a possible
    length for DF? 8 in., 10 in., 12 in., or 23 in.?

15
Ex. 3 Finding Possible Side Lengths and Angle
Measures
  • Because the included angle in ?DEF is larger than
    the included angle in ?ABC, the third side DF
    must be longer than AC. So, of the four choices,
    the only possible length for DF is 23 inches. A
    diagram of the triangle shows this is plausible.

16
Ex. 3 Finding Possible Side Lengths and Angle
Measures
  • ?RST and a ?XYZ, RT ? XZ, ST ? YZ, RS 3.7 cm.,
    XY 4.5 cm, and m?Z 75. Which of the
    following is a possible measure for ?T 60,
    75, 90, or 105.

17
Ex. 3 Finding Possible Side Lengths and Angle
Measures
  • Because the third side in ?RST is shorter than
    the third side in ?XYZ, the included angle ?T
    must be smaller than ?Z. So, of the four
    choices, the only possible measure for ?T is 60.

18
Ex. 4 Comparing Distances
  • TRAVEL DISTANCE You and a friend are flying
    separate planes. You leave the airport and fly
    120 miles due west. You then change direction
    and fly W 30 N for 70 miles. (W 30 N indicates
    a north-west direction that is 30 north of due
    west.) Your friend leaves the airport and flies
    120 miles due east. She then changes direction
    and flies E 40 S for 70 miles. Each of you has
    flown 190 miles, but which plane is further from
    the airport?

19
SOLUTION
  • Begin by drawing a diagram as shown. Your flight
    is represented by ?PQR and your friends flight
    is represented by ?PST.
  • Because these two triangles have two sides that
    are congruent, you can apply the Hinge Theorem to
    conclude that RP is longer than TP.
  • So, your plane is further from the airport than
    your friends plane.

N
140
W
E
150
S
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com