Title: Intrauterine contraception
1Intrauterine contraception
2IUD is the official name
3Origins
4Characteristics of LARCs
- Long-acting method (work over gt 1 cycle)
- Reversible
- High efficacy
- Does not need motivation on a daily basis or when
having sex - Vanishingly low mortality rate
5Copper IUDs
- The only LARC that is non-hormonal
- Useful for women who have side effects with
oestrogen/progestogen
6Terminology
- Inert
- Just plastic frame
- Medicated
- Copper bearing (wire or collars)
- Hormone releasing
- Intrauterine system (IUS)
7Prevalence in women aged 15-49 (UN 2001)
8Current use 2004 by women aged 16 - 49
9FP10s (000s) for IUD/IUS
10Inert devices
11Copper IUDs
- First generation (200mm2)
- copper 7 and copper T 200
- Second generation (220-250mm2)
- Nova T, Multiload 250
- Third generation (300mm2)
- T380, Multiload 375 and Flexi-T 300
12(No Transcript)
13Gyne-Fix
- Frameless device
- Six copper cylinders on a thread
- Knot embedded in myometrium using a stilette
- Low expulsion rate (but not zero)
- Perforation rate appreciable
- Suitable for nullips
- Suitable for emergency contraception
14Mechanism of action
- All IUDs cause an increase in number of
leucocytes, in endometrium and in uterine and
tubal fluid - The above impedes sperm transport and
fertilisation. Actual phagocytosis of sperm has
been reported - Copper enhances foreign body reaction and causes
biochemical changes in the endometrium - Copper ions are also directly toxic to sperm and
blastocyst
15Effectiveness of IUDs/IUS
- Most effective IUDs contain 380mm2 copper and
have banded copper on the side arms - Pregnancy rate with these devices is very low 2
over 5 years - Some evidence that IUS is more effective than
380mm2 copper IUDs, but difference is small and
of doubtful clinical significance
16Efficacy of IUDs/IUS
- First generation
- lt 2 per 100 woman years
- Second generation
- 1.0 1.5 per 100 woman years
- Third generation (high copper load)
- lt 1 per 100 woman years
- Mirena
- lt 0.5 per 100 woman years
17Efficacy of copper IUDs as emergency contraception
- Very few failures ever reported
- Has been calculated to be 15 times more effective
than PC4 was - Method of choice at 72-120 hours and if high
efficacy is vital
18(No Transcript)
19Lifespans
- The licensed duration of use for use of IUDs
containing 380mm2 copper ranges from 5 to 10
years, depending on the type of device - Women who are aged 40 or over at the time of
insertion may retain the device until they no
longer need contraception, even if this is beyond
the duration of UK Marketing Authorisation
20WHO 4 unacceptable health risk, should not be
used
- Pregnancy
- Unexplained genital tract bleeding
- STI/PID current
- Post-pregnancy sepsis
- Distortion of uterine cavity
- Malignant trophoblastic disease
- Cervical or endometrial cancer
- Known pelvic TB
21WHO 3 risks usually outweigh benefits
- Postpartum insertion 48 hrs to 4 weeks (higher
perforation rate)
22WHO 2 benefits generally outweigh risks
- Nulliparas
- Age lt 20 years
- Menorrhagia
- Anaemia
- Increased STI risk
- STI/PID in last 3/12
- HIV positive
- Severe dysmenorrhoea
- Anatomical abnormalities/ fibroids not distorting
cavity - Complicated valvular heart disease
- lt 48 hrs postpartum insertion
23Medical removals of copper IUDs
- Average menstrual loss increased from 30-40ml to
70-80ml - Removal rates for bleeding and/or pain are around
8 at 3 years - NSAIDs or tranexamic acid may help
24Expulsion of IUDs
- Risk is around 1 in 20 for copper-bearing devices
- Rate declines after insertion most common in
first year, especially 1st 3 months - More likely during a period
- Rate lower in older women and those of higher
parity - Teaching women to check threads is important
25Data from RCTs 65,000 woman years
26Ectopic pregnancy
- IUD/IUS more effective at preventing intrauterine
than tubal pregnancy - Absolute number of ectopics less in IUD/IUS
wearers than those using no method - High-load devices protect against ectopic
pregnancy - Risk of ectopic pregnancy with IUD in situ is 1
per 1000 over 5 years - If a woman with an IUD in situ becomes pregnant,
risk of ectopic is 6 and an ectopic should be
excluded
27Copper IUDs and PID
- 6-7x increase in PID in the 20 days after
insertion - No increase in PID thereafter
- No better outcome if prophylactic antibiotics
given at time of insertion - Absolute risk of PID after IUD insertion lt 1 in
women at low risk from STIs
28Copper IUDs and cancer
- At least a 50 reduction in endometrial cancer
risk - Note
- Based on systematic review of 7 studies, mostly
case-control
29IUS (Mirena)
- Releases levonorgestrel for gt5 years lifespan
possibly to 7 years - Highest efficacy of any intrauterine device lt1
over 5 years - Suppresses endometrium
- Altered bleeding patterns are common
30IUS (Mirena) 2
- Rapid return of fertility
- Low risk of ectopic pregnancy
- Can reduce menstrual blood loss by gt 90
- Possibly small increased risk of functional
ovarian cysts initially after insertion not
significantly different from IUDs at 5 years - Women aged 45 or above at the time of insertion
may retain their IUS for 7 years
31Uses of the IUS ( licensed)
- Contraception (not EC)
- Menorrhagia (alternative to hysterectomy)
- ? Primary dysmenorrhoea
- ? Fibroids
- ? Endometriosis
- To oppose oestrogen in HRT (4 years only)
- ? Endometrial hyperplasia
32Lifespan of IUS
- RCT of IUS and copper T 380Ag
- No pregnancies with either device in years 6 and
7 - Cumulative pregnancy rates 1.1 per 100 at seven
years for IUS and 1.4 per 100 for IUD
33Medical eligibility for IUS
- Current thromboembolism WHO 3
- Current breast cancer WHO 4
- Liver disease WHO 3
34IUS and hormonal side effects
- LNG absorption equivalent to about 2 POPs per
week (wide interindividual variation in serum LNG
levels) - A small minority of women request removal on
account of progestogenic side effects
depression, acne, headache, weight gain and
breast tenderness - More so in the first 3 months
- Not significantly different from IUDs at 5 years
35Mechanism of action
36Chlamydia testing before insertion
- Involve woman in assessing her own STI risk
- Test at request of woman
- Test if at higher risk of STIs
- sexually active and aged under 25
- age gt25 if have had a new sexual partner or gt1
sexual partner in last year - Test for gonorrhoea too if local prevalence high
37Prophylaxis to prevent bacterial endocarditis
- Women with previous endocarditis
- Prosthetic heart valve(s)
- Antibiotic as per BNF
- Intravenous route i.e. hospital setting
- For removals as well as insertions
38Timing of IUD insertion
- Up to 120 hours after UPSI
- Up to 5 days after the calculated earliest day of
ovulation up to day 19 of a 28 day shortest
cycle on history - Any time in cycle if pregnancy has been excluded
- Immediately after suction TOP
- 4 weeks after delivery
39Problems at insertion
- Cervical shock vasovagal attack
- caused by dilatation of the cervix
- bradycardia possible
- usually resolves spontaneously
- if severe, remove device
- resuscitation equipment and drugs ready
- Epileptic fits
- rare
- Hyperventilation
40Perforation of uterus
- Occurs at the time of insertion
- Incidence is lt 1 per 1000 insertions
- Use a tenaculum to straighten cervico-uterine
angle - Can be silent
- Copper-bearing devices must be removed by
laparoscopy
41Lost threads
- Main reasons are
- threads too short or are drawn up into cervical
canal or uterus - unrecognised expulsion of the device
- perforation of uterus resulting in translocation
of device into peritoneal cavity
42Action to be taken in the event of lost threads
- Try to find them in cervical canal with Spencer
Wells forceps - Sweep uterine cavity with thread retriever e.g.
Emmett device (first half of cycle only) - Ultrasound scan
- X-ray
43Removal of IUDs/IUS
- Easy!
- Beware removal around mid-cycle when woman does
not wish to become pregnant - If removing device urgently because of medical
problems, consider use of hormonal emergency
contraception - Wait until period after sterilisation
44Return of fertility after removal of IUD/IUS
- No reduction in fertility compared to those
stopping other methods - Mean time to pregnancy following removal is 3
months
45Actinomyces-like organisms
- ALOs may be detected on cervical smears of
IUD/IUS users (and non-users) - If no symptoms, there is no reason to remove the
device
46Continuation comparative study
84
80
72
70
63
55
47Continuation 5 year follow up of 17,360 IUS users
93
87
81
75
65