Chapter 32 Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Periphyton - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 32 Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Periphyton

Description:

Nutrient solution is sealed inside a terracotta pot with a solid bottom ... 2. Terracotta Problems. Fe, Ca, Al lock up P. Inconsistencies in materials ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Chris1457
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 32 Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Periphyton


1
Chapter 32 Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on
Periphyton
  • Christopher Eisler
  • Tennessee Tech University

in.water.usgs.gov
2
Periphyton
  • Periphyton are defined as micro floral growth
    upon substrata.
  • Factors Influencing Periphyton Growth.
  • 1. Light
  • 2. Temperature
  • 3. Water Velocity
  • 4. Grazing Pressure
  • 5. Nutrient and Toxic Loading

3
Local Assessment
  • Testing is a must to determine nutrient affects
    in the stream of concern.
  • More Control Less Applicable
  • Less Control Greater Applicability for current
    conditions
  • Time and Space change the stream

4
Local Assessment
  • Factors controlling natural periphyton growth are
    less well understood than other phenomenon.
  • Low nutrient levels in streams can still meet
    growth needs due to water flow.

5
Temporal Nutrient Additions
  • Nutrient additions may occur as a
  • pulse
  • Pulse Occurrences
  • Times of Day
  • Storms
  • Seasonal (Fall can be a time of high nutrient
    addition)

6
Methods
  • Method Selection Depends On Spatial Scale
  • Advantages and Disadvantages for each
  • Four Types of Methods
  • Point Source- best in 3 to 4 order streams
  • Flow Through Enclosures- best in 3 to 4 order
    streams
  • Whole Stream Manipulations- best in 1 to 2 order
  • Integrated Approaches

7
Point Source
  • Allows stream testing without enclosure
  • Low Control but in natural settings
  • Nutrient Diffusing Substrata has low impact
  • Nutrient solution is sealed inside a terracotta
    pot with a solid bottom
  • Simulation of Natural Phenomenon
    (ex.Chironimidae)

8
(No Transcript)
9
Point Source
  • Advantages
  • 1. Effective in nutrient cycling evaluations
  • 2. Validation of Models
  • 3. Detecting limits in Shotgun approach
  • 4. Supplements other techniques

10
Point Source
  • Disadvantages
  • 1. Inconsistencies in release (Pulse Phenomenon)
  • Algae Example
  • 2. Terracotta Problems
  • Fe, Ca, Al lock up P
  • Inconsistencies in materials
  • A slow release fertilizer can help overcome some
    problems.

11
Point Source- Matlock Periphyton Meter
  • Uses Glass Wool and a Bio filter over a plastic
    bottle
  • Slowly Releases Nutrients
  • Overcomes many problems

12
Flow Through Enclosures
  • Also called Flumes
  • Serve as a way to modify such variables as flow,
    nutrient content, substrate size.
  • Can rise and fall with the stream
  • Must be open on top however to avoid enclosure
    effects

13
(No Transcript)
14
Whole Stream Assessment
  • Realistic but time consuming since not just
    periphyton affected
  • Low Flows Best
  • Alternative to radio isotopes is addition of low
    amount of nutrient.

15
Integrative Approach
  • Allow comparison through differing scales
  • Can show interactions between substrate and water
    column
  • Synergistic effects can be measured in this and
    other methods
  • No3 and PO4 Limitation Example
  • Sometimes temperature can affect flow rate in a
    method

16
Algal Assessment
  • Effects measured by Chlorophyll a and Free Dry
    Mass (AFDM)
  • A method should be determined by the scale to be
    measured
  • Accessibility of sites should be considered since
    nutrients may need refilling

17
Method Selection
  • A method should be determined by the scale to be
    measured
  • Consider accessibility of sites, nutrients may
    need refilling

18
Questions
19
Chapter Questions
  • 1. It may lock up nutrients for example Fe, Ca,
    Al lock down P. Phosphorous may not defuse while
    other nutrients do if P limits growth. Conversely
    it may defuse to much to soon. If this occurs
    algal sloughing may occur giving a false reading.
  • 3. A limiting nutrient may not be there in the
    right a mount for growth to occur. Another reason
    is algae may have sloughed off already.

20
Chapter Questions
  • 5. Caution is needed since the method for one
    scale may be biased when applied to another
    scale. Also a stream can have many tributaries
    that may cause dilution.
  • 7. Grazers could affect results at site since bio
    mass could be easily available. The second part
    is not answerable. To quantify effects of
    grazers raise the saucers off the bottom.

21
Environmental Assessment NoteChapter 34
  • Knowledge of nutrient effects on algae can be
    used assess ecosystem quality
  • Algae have been used for a very long time to
    monitor water quality (Especially Europe)
  • Relatively inexpensive and easy to catch them

22
Environmental Assessment NoteChapter 34
  • Resources Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use
    in Streams and Wadeable Rivers Periphyton,
    Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Second
    Edition
  • http//www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/rbp/
  • Technical Guidance Manual Rivers Streams
  • http//www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/
    guidance/rivers/index.html
  • Other resources listed in
  • Haur, F. R., and G.A. Lamberti, 2006 Methods in
    Stream Ecology 2nd edition. New York, New York
    Academic Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com