Surface Processes Acting On Airless Bodies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Surface Processes Acting On Airless Bodies

Description:

Ponding of regolith seen on Eros. Regolith grains 1cm move downslope. Ponded in ... NEAR mission Eros showed similar elemental composition to chondrites ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Shane72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surface Processes Acting On Airless Bodies


1
Surface Processes Acting On Airless Bodies
2
In This Lecture
  • Regolith Generation
  • Turnover timescales
  • Megaregolith
  • Space Weathering
  • Impact gardening
  • Sputtering
  • Ion-implantation
  • Volatiles in a Vacuum
  • Surface-bounded exospheres
  • Volatile migration
  • Permanent shadow

Gaspra Galileo mission
3
  • All rocky airless bodies covered with regolith
    (rock blanket)

Moon - Helfenstein and Shepard 1999
Itokawa Miyamoto et al. 2007
Miyamoto et al. 2007
Eros NEAR spacecraft (12m across)
4
Growth of Regolith
  • Crust of airless bodies suffers many impacts
  • Repeated impacts create a layer of pulverized
    rock
  • Old craters get filled in by ejecta blankets of
    new ones
  • Maximum thickness related to depth of largest
  • crater to reach equilibrium
  • Estimate Deq from a size-frequency plot or solve
  • (note surface must saturate so b must be gt2)
  • If equilibrium 4 of geometric saturation then
    ceq0.046

Shoemaker et al., 1969
5
  • Minimum regolith thickness more complicated
  • Figure out the fractional area (fc) covered by
    craters D?Deq where (D lt Deq)
  • Choose some Dmin where youre sure that every
    point on the surface has been hit at least once
  • Typical to pick Dmin so that f(Dmin,Deq) 2
  • hmin of regolith Dmin/4
  • General case
  • Probability that the regolith has a depth h is
    P(h) f(4h?Deq) / fmin
  • Median regolith depth lthgt when P(lthgt) 0.5
  • Time dependence in heq or rather Deq a time1/(b-2)

6
  • Mega-regolith
  • Fractured bedrock extend down many kilometers
  • Acts as an insulating layer and restricts heat
    flow
  • 2-3km thick under lunar highlands and 1km under
    maria
  • Regolith turnover
  • Shoemaker defines as disturbance depth (d)
  • time until f(4d, Deq) 1
  • Things eventually get buried on these bodies
  • Mixing time of regolith depends on depth
    specified
  • Cosmic ray exposure ages on Moon
  • 10cm in 500 Myr

7
  • Ponding of regolith seen on Eros
  • Regolith grains lt1cm move downslope
  • Ponded in depressions
  • Possibly due to seismic shaking from impacts

Miyamoto et al. 2007
Robinson et al. 2001
8
  • Cratered landscapes
  • Relief-generation
  • Crater formation
  • Relief-Reduction
  • Seismic shaking
  • Impact gardening
  • Volcanic flooding

9
Space Weathering
  • The vacuum environment heavily affects individual
    grains
  • Impact gardening micrometeorites
  • Comminution (breaking up) particles
  • Agglutination grains get welded together by
    impact glass
  • Vaporization of material
  • Heavy material recondenses on nearby grains
  • Volatile material enters atmosphere
  • Solar wind
  • Energetic particles cause sputtering
  • Ions can get implanted
  • Cosmic rays
  • Nuclear effects change isotopes dating
  • Collectively known as space-weathering
  • Spectral band-depth is
  • reduced
  • Objects get darker
  • and redder with time

10
  • Asteroid surfaces exhibit space weathering
  • C-types not very much
  • S-types a lot (still not as much as the Moon)
  • Weathering works faster on some surface
    compositions
  • Smaller asteroids (in general) are the result of
    more recent collisions less weathered
  • Material around impact craters is also fresher

Ida (and Dactyl) Galileo mission
  • S-type conundrum
  • S-Type asteroids are the most common asteroid
  • Ordinary chondrites are the most numerous
    meteorites
  • Parent bodies couldnt be identified, but
  • Galileo flyby of S-type asteroids showed surface
    color has less red patches
  • NEAR mission Eros showed similar elemental
    composition to chondrites

11
  • Nanophase iron is largely responsible
  • Micrometeorites and sputtering vaporize target
    material
  • Heavy elements (like Fe) recondense onto nearby
    grains
  • Electron microscopes show patina a few 10s of nm
    thick
  • Patina contains spherules of nanophase Fe
  • Fe-Si minerals also contribute to reddening
  • e.g. Fe2Si Hapkeite (after Bruce Hapke)
  • Sputtering
  • Ejection of particles from impacting ions
  • Solar-wind particles
  • H and He nuclei
  • Traveling at 100s of Km s-1
  • Warped Archimedean spiral
  • Implantation of ions into surface may explain
    reduced neutron counts

12
  • Lunar swirls
  • High albedo patches
  • Associated with crustal magnetism
  • Most are antipodal to large basins
  • Model 1
  • Magnetic field prevents space weathering
  • Model 2
  • Dust levitation concentrates fine particles in
    these areas
  • Levitation concentrated near terminator
  • Photoelectric emission of electrons

Wang et al. 2008
13
Volatiles in a Vacuum
  • Airless bodies do have atmospheres
  • Surface bounded exospheres
  • Atoms collide more often with the surface than
    with each other
  • mean free path gtgt atmospheric scale height
  • (really means that mean free path gtgt trajectory
    of a molecule)
  • Molecules ejected from hot surface with a
    Maxwellian velocity distribution
  • Launched on an orbital track (if they dont
    escape outright)
  • with range
  • Particles from hotter regions travel furthest
  • Particles continue to hop around until they find
    cold spots (e.g. night-side or shadowed area)

14
  • The Moon and Mercury both possess tenuous
    atmospheres

Calcium now also seen at Mercury
  • Sodium emission at the Moon and Mercury shows
    temporal changes
  • Stirring of regolith by small impacts

15
  • Planetary ices sublimate at a (very) temperature
    dependant rate
  • Depends on the vapor pressure
  • Psat comes from the Clausius-Clapeyron relation

Andreas, 2007
  • Sublimation rates are extraordinarily temperature
    sensitive
  • 1m of water ice can survive 1 Gyr at 110K
  • but temps of 130K can sublimate 1km of water ice
  • lt 1m/Gyr is considered stable

Vasavada et al., 1999
16
  • H, He, O can be delivered by the solar wind
  • Na, K, Ca are derived from the surface mostly
    by impacts
  • H2O delivered episodically by comets
  • Neutral molecule travels on ballistic bounces
    around the surface until
  • It is ionized by a photon solar wind can then
    push it back into the surface or sweep it away
  • It hits a cold (night-side or shadowed) area
  • Lifetimes depend on ease of ionization and solar
    flux
  • 1 hour (9 minutes) for Na on the Moon (Mercury)
  • Few 100 days (month or two) for H on the Moon
    (Mercury)
  • H2O molecules can be destroyed in many ways
  • Sputtering
  • Photo-ionization (then removed by charged solar
    wind)
  • Photo-disassociation
  • or just thermal escape
  • Molecules stuck in shadows wait until sunrise
    before being launched again
  • But what if the sun never rises?
  • What if there was a shadow that was always
    there?......

17
  • Do permanently shadowed regions exist?
  • Yes, Moon and Mercury have low obliquity
  • Solar elevations in the polar regions are always
    low
  • Even modest craters can have permanent shadow on
    their floors

Margot et al., 1999
18
  • Modeling (Vasavada et al. 1999) shows
    temperatures in permanently shadowed craters are
    very low
  • These cold traps are favored condensation sites

Mercury
Moon
Vasavada et al., 1999
19
  • Evidence for ice in polar craters of the Moon and
    Mercury
  • Evidence for ice at lunar poles
  • Clementine bi-static radar
  • Lunar prospector neutron data fewer neutrons
    indicates surface hydrogen
  • Evidence for ice at poles of Mercury
  • VLA radar returns

20
  • How about other airless bodies asteroids?
  • Low gravity is a problem, molecules tend to
    escape
  • Largest asteroid Ceres (900km) does show some
    promise
  • Current polar loss rates are 1m/Gyr without
    shadowing
  • Previous observations of OH- surrounding Ceres
  • Interpreted to be photo-dissassociation of water

21
  • Polar ice on the Moon first suggested by Watson,
    Murray Brown (1961)
  • As long as there is an ice deposit there
  • Atmospheric pressure will be the Psat over the
    ice
  • which depends on Tice
  • Higher pressure will cause net condensation,
    lower will cause net sublimation
  • If ice is to be sustainable over solar system
    history then it must be delivered at the same
    rate its sublimated.
  • Water leaves cold traps by sublimation
  • 5-15 returns on Mercury
  • 20-50 returns on the Moon
  • The rest is lost
  • Water can be delivered by meteors and comets
  • For Mercury these rates have been estimated
  • Balance exists if Tice is 113K

Killen et al., 1997
  • Moon/Mercury differences
  • Mercurys ice deposits were easily detected
  • Lunar ice is probably not abundant barely
    detected
  • Mercury may have experienced a recent impact that
    delivered a lot of water

22
Regolith Generation
  • Regolith generated by continuous impacts
  • Depth of regolith can be related to how saturated
    a surface is with craters
  • Regolith depth increases with time
  • Down-slope movement of regolith on asteroids

Space Weathering
  • Objects in space get darker and redder with time
  • S-type conundrum solved by realizing that their
    spectra once looked chondritic
  • Weathering caused by condensation of nanophase
    iron vaporized by micrometeroites
  • Albedo swirls caused by interaction of solar wind
    and crustal magnetism

Volatiles on Airless Bodies
  • Surface bounded exospheres
  • molecule-surface collisions gtgt molecule-molecule
    collisions
  • Vapor pressure (temperature) of volatiles
    determines their stability
  • Volatiles can hide in permanently shadowed
    regions polar craters
  • Strong evidence for polar ice on Mercury
  • but weak evidence on the Moon
  • very weak evidence on large asteroids
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com