Appraisal of SSDPF bids - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Appraisal of SSDPF bids

Description:

What does a DPF concept bid look like? Summary activity description & intended outcomes ... Cross-cutting issues just box-ticking' Value for money? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: vickip8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Appraisal of SSDPF bids


1
Appraisal of SSDPF bids
Vicki Plater Strategy, Advisory and Evaluation
Group
2
What does a DPF concept bid look like?
  • Summary activity description intended outcomes
  • Fit with SSDPF objective
  • Fit with national/regional plans
  • Fit with counterparts mandate
  • Fit with your mandate
  • How need identified
  • Value for money

3
SSDPF objective
  • contributing to prosperity, stability and
    poverty reduction in partner countries by
    enhancing the conditions for broad-based
    sustainable economic growth

4
What does a DPF concept bid look like?
  • Summary activity description intended outcomes
  • Fit with SSDPF objective
  • Fit with national/regional plans
  • Fit with counterparts mandate
  • Fit with your mandate
  • How need identified
  • Value for money

5
What does a DPF proposal look like?
  • Activity description problem identification,
    anticipated outcomes, outputs and inputs
  • Ownership fit with national/regional plans
  • Alignment fit with SSDPF objective, counterpart
    organisations and own agencys mandates
  • Relevance how complements other donor
    initiatives
  • Managing for Development Results risks,
    sustainability and exit strategy, monitoring and
    evaluation
  • Efficiency value for money
  • Cross-cutting issues gender, environment and
    human rights

6
What criteria do we use to assess bids?
  • (i) Relevance? (meet priority needs, contribute
    to SED)
  • (ii) Effectiveness? (in achieving objectives)
  • (iii) Efficiency? (value for money, management
    arrangements)
  • (iv) Impact? (intended and unintended)
  • (v) Sustainability? (development benefits beyond
    the activity)

7
What criteria do we use to assess bids?
  • (vi) Cross cutting issues? (gender, environment,
    human rights)
  • (vii) Broader policy interests? (MFAT)
  • (viii) Aid effectiveness?
  • Ownership
  • Alignment
  • Harmonisation
  • Managing for development results
  • Mutual accountability

8
Strengths in applications
  • Strong understanding of context
  • ? proposal is relevant and sustainable
  • Promote ongoing relationships between agencies
  • Aligns with strategy and links to development
  • Demonstrate consultation and coordination with
    relevant govt/regional agencies and donors

9
Common weaknesses
  • What is the big picture?
  • Lack specifics - what are you trying to achieve
    and how will the proposed approach contribute to
    that?
  • Poor country ownership
  • Implementation approach not appropriate e.g.
    burden on limited human resource capacity
  • Cross-cutting issues just box-ticking

10
Value for money?
  • A contestable fund is there good value from
    this spend?
  • Best mechanism for delivery?
  • Additionality? Not just transferring core
    government function?
  • Overheads or consultancy fees?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com