Ethics of Duty Example: Kantianism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics of Duty Example: Kantianism

Description:

Utilitarianism does not explain why we should respect people's 'rights'. Utilitarianism does not support keeping promises, unless it will support the general ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:585
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: rogerp1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics of Duty Example: Kantianism


1
Ethics of DutyExample Kantianism
  • Introduction to Philosophy
  • Spring 2007

2
Utilitarianism Problems
  • Maximizing happiness might require performing
    immoral actions.
  • E.g.. Could said three lives by taking one.
  • Utilitarianism does not explain why we should
    respect peoples rights.
  • Utilitarianism does not support keeping promises,
    unless it will support the general happiness.
  • Utilitarianism seems to be too demanding.

3
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
  • Sought to establish all philosophy on a rational
    ground.
  • Believed that what is right and wrong could be
    determined by reason.
  • Reason dictates a basic, unconditional
    imperative, that applies to all rational beings.
    (Kant called this the categorical imperative.)

4
The Categorical ImperativeTwo formulations.
  • The Universal Law Formulation Always act on
    those maxims that you could at the same time
    (rationally) will to become a universal law (of
    nature).
  • Application You are thinking of cheating on your
    exam. Could you will a world in which everyone
    cheated? No. Because if everyone cheated, then
    the exams would not be taken seriously and you
    would not achieve what you are seeking in
    cheating.
  • Kant argued that it is never right to lie.
  • Basic idea If you have a reason that makes it
    rational for you to do something, then that same
    reason would make it rational for any human being
    to do the same thing. If you could not
    rationally will for everyone to do it, then it
    must not really be rational for you to perform
    that action.

5
The Categorical ImperativeTwo formulations.
  • The End-in-themselves Formulation Always treat
    rational beings (other persons) as
    ends-in-themselves, and never merely as a means.
  • Application You are thinking of cheating on your
    exam. But to cheat on an exam is to manipulate
    your instructor into giving you a grade you do
    not deserve. You are simply using them to get a
    good grade.
  • Basic idea Humans beings have inherent worth or
    dignity and should be treated with respect due to
    their status as rational beings. To be a
    rational being is to have the capacity to make
    autonomous, rational decisions. Lying, killing,
    cheating, injuring, manipulating, etc., others in
    order to achieve you own goals is to treat them
    as things to be used and to bypass their own
    freedom and right to set their own rational goals.

6
Influential Theories of Ethics
  • Divine Command Ethics
  • Based on Gods Commands
  • Rooted in religious traditions
  • Utilitarianism
  • Based on weighing consequences
  • Attractive to empiricists because you look and
    see.
  • Kantianism
  • Based on reason.
  • Grounds such things as rights, duties, etc.

7
Influential Theories of Ethics
  • Divine Command Ethics
  • Utilitarianism
  • Kantianism
  • Natural Rights Theory
  • Humans have basic natural rights that are
    rationally self-evident. (Similar to Kantianism)
  • Natural Law Theory
  • There are basic moral values that can be derived
    from human nature. (Influential in Roman
    Catholic thought)
  • Virtue Ethics
  • The focus of ethics should not be on right and
    wrong actions, but on character, on virtues and
    vices, good and bad character traits. Not What
    is right and wrong? but What kind of person am
    I?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com