Title: BIOTERRORISM RNSG 1413 Amy C. Chavarria, RN, MSN, MBA, HCM, CCE
1BIOTERRORISMRNSG 1413 Amy C. Chavarria, RN,
MSN, MBA, HCM, CCE
2 The Face of Bioterrorism
3 BIOTERRORISM
- Intentional or threatened use of viruses,
bacteria, fungi, or toxins from living organisms
to produce death or disease in humans, animals,
or plants
4HISTORY OFBIOLOGICAL WARFARE
- 14th Century Plague at Kaffa
5HISTORY OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
- 18th Century Smallpox Blankets
British commanding officers in the French and
Indian War resorted to the intentional use of
smallpox-infested blankets and clothing to infect
the Indians who were fighting along side the
French.
6HISTORY OFBIOLOGICAL WARFARE
- 20th Century
- 1943 USA program launched
- 1953 Defensive program established
- 1969 Offensive program
- disbanded
7BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGREEMENTS
- 1925 Geneva Protocol
- 1972 Biological Weapons
- Convention
- 1975 Geneva Conventions
- Ratified
8BIOTERRORISM
9BioterrorismWho are 1st Responders?
- Primary Care Personnel
- Hospital ER Staff
- EMS Personnel
- Public Health Professionals
- Other Emergency Preparedness Personnel
- Laboratory Personnel
- Law Enforcement
- Firefighters
10PUBLIC HEALTH
- Effective planning and response to a biological
terrorist incident will require collaboration
with federal, state, and local groups and
agencies including
-public health organizations -medical research
centers -health-care providers and their
networks -professional societies -medical
examiners
-emergency response units and
organizations -safety and medical equipment
manufacturers -US Office of Emergency
Management -other federal agencies
11ISSUES
- Existing local, regional, and national
surveillance systems - Adequate to detect traditional agents
- Inadequate to detect potential biowarfare agents
- Specific training for health care professionals
- clinical personnel will be first responders
12ISSUES
- Civilian biodefense plans are usually based on
HAZMAT models - Assumes responders enter a high exposure
environment near the source - Assumes site of exposure is separate from the
health care facility - Assumes no time pressure for decontamination
- Maximum protection is provided for a minimum
number of workers / rescuers
13ISSUES
- HAZMAT
- OSHA mandates use of PPE based on site hazard,
but site hazards are more easily defined at the
point of release - Traditional HAZMAT products are expensive, take
time to set up, and are inadequate for large
numbers of patients - Difficult to train and maintain proficiency in a
civilian work force with high turnover
14Key Problems
- Managing an outbreak
- The hard problem
- Investigating the attack if it is bioterrorism
- Does not require any special laws
- Demands effective public health infrastructure
- Preventing bioterrorism
- Laws on control of agents and personnel
15Minimal Threat
- Limited and non-communicable
- Anthrax Letters
- Scary, but very small risk to a small number of
people - Gross Overreaction in Government Office Buildings
- Huge Costs dealing with copycats
- No special legal problems
16Significant Threat, Not Destabilizing
- Broad and non-communicable
- Anthrax from a crop duster over a major city
- Could be managed with massive, immediate
antibiotic administration and management of
causalities - Panic will quickly become the core problem
17Significant Threat, Potentially Destabilizing
- Limited and communicable
- A few cases of smallpox in one place
- Demands fast action
- If it spreads it can undermine public order
- Probably controllable, but with significant
vaccine related causalities
18Imminent Threat of Governmental Destabilization
- Broad and communicable
- Multiple cases of smallpox, multiple locations
- Would demand complete shutdown on transportation
- Would quickly require military intervention
- Local vaccination plans are mostly unworkable
19POTENTIAL BIOTERRORISM AGENTS
- Viruses
- Smallpox
- VEE
- VHF-viral hemorrhagic fever
- Bacterial Agents
- Anthrax
- Brucellosis
- Cholera
- Plague, Pneumonic
- Tularemia
- Q Fever
- Source U.S. A.M.R.I.I.D.
- Biological Toxins
- Botulinum
- Staph Entero-B
- Ricin
- T-2 Mycotoxins
20CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTSCATEGORY A
- High priority agents that pose a threat to
national security because they - can be easily disseminated or transmitted
person-to-person - cause high mortality, with potential for major
public health impact - might cause panic and social disruption
- require special public health preparedness
21CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTS CATEGORY A
- Variola major (smallpox)
- Bacillus anthracis (anthrax)
- Yersinia pestis (plague)
- Clostridium botulinum toxin (botulism)
- Francisella tularensis (tularemia)
- Filoviruses
- Ebola hemorrhagic fever
- Marburg hemorrhagic fever
- Arenaviruses
- Lassa (Lassa fever)
- Junin (Argentine hemorrhagic fever) and related
viruses
22Smallpox
23Parapox
Anthrax
24CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTSCATEGORY B
- Second highest priority agents that include those
that - are moderately easy to disseminate
- cause moderate morbidity and low mortality
- require specific enhancements of CDCs diagnostic
capacity and enhanced disease surveillance
25CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTSCATEGORY B
- Coxiella burnetti (Q fever)
- Brucella species (brucellosis)
- Burkholderia mallei (glanders)
- Alphaviruses
- Venezuelan encephalomyelitis
- eastern / western equine encephalomyelitis
- Ricin toxin from Ricinus communis (castor bean)
- Epsilon toxin of Clostridium perfringens
- Staphylococcus enterotoxin B
26CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTSCATEGORY B
- Subset of Category B agents that include
pathogens that are food- or waterborne - Salmonella species
- Shigella dysenteriae
- Escherichia coli O157H7
- Vibrio cholerae
- Cryptosporidium parvum
27CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTSCATEGORY C
- Third highest priority agents include emerging
pathogens that could be engineered for mass
dissemination in the future because of - availability
- ease of production and dissemination
- potential for high morbidity and mortality and
major health impact - Preparedness for Category C agents requires
ongoing research to improve detection, diagnosis,
treatment, and prevention
28CRITICAL BIOLOGICAL AGENTSCATEGORY C
- Nipah virus
- Hantaviruses
- Tickborne hemorrhagic fever viruses
- Tickborne encephalitis viruses
- Yellow fever
- Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
29Parapox
Anthrax
30ADVANTAGES OF BIOLOGICS AS WEAPONS
- Infectious via aerosol
- Organisms fairly stable in environment
- Susceptible civilian populations
- High morbidity and mortality
- Person-to-person transmission (smallpox,
plague, VHF) - Difficult to diagnose and/or treat
- Previous development for BW
31ADVANTAGES OF BIOLOGICS AS WEAPONS
- Easy to obtain
- Inexpensive to produce
- Potential for dissemination over large geographic
area - Creates panic
- Can overwhelm medical services
- Perpetrators escape easily
32BIOTERRORISMHOW REAL IS THE THREAT?
33ANTHRAX BIOTERRORISM
San Francisco Chronicle, 20 December 1998
34ISSUES
- Existing local, regional, and national
surveillance systems - Adequate to detect traditional agents
- Inadequate to detect potential biowarfare agents
- Specific training for health care professionals
- clinical personnel will be first responders
35 36ISSUES
- Civilian biodefense plans are usually based on
HAZMAT models - Assumes responders enter a high exposure
environment near the source - Assumes site of exposure is separate from the
health care facility - Assumes no time pressure for decontamination
- Maximum protection is provided for a minimum
number of workers / rescuers
37Threats reported to FBI
Source FBI personal communication
38(No Transcript)
39 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL TERRORISM
- 1984 The Dalles, Oregon, Salmonella (salad
bar) - 1991 Minnesota, ricin toxin (hoax)
- 1994 Tokyo, Sarin and biological attacks
- 1995 Arkansas, ricin toxin (hoax)
- 1995 Ohio, Yersinia pestis (sent in mail)
- 1997 Washington DC, Anthrax (hoax)
- 1998 Nevada , non-lethal strain of B. anthracis
- 1998 Multiple Anthrax hoaxes
40SALMONELLOSIS CAUSED BY INTENTIONAL CONTAMINATION
- The Dalles, Oregon in Fall of 1984
- 751 cases of Salmonella
- Eating at salad bars in 10 restaurants
- Criminal investigation identified perpetrators as
followers of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh
SOURCE Torok et al. JAMA 1997278389
41Source ASAHI SHIMBUN SIPA
42CLINICAL STATUS OF PATIENTS EXPOSED TO SARIN ON
MARCH 21, 1995
Dead 8 Critical 17 Severe
37 Moderate 984 Outpatient 4,073 Unknown
391 Total 5,510
43SHIGELLOSIS CAUSED BY INTENTIONAL CONTAMINATION
- Dallas, Texas in Fall of 1996
- 12 (27) of 45 laboratory workers in a large
medical center had severe diarrheal illness - 8 (67) had positive stool cultures for S.
dysenteriae type 2 - Eating muffins or donuts in staff break room
implicated - PFGE patterns indistinguishable for stool,
muffin, and laboratory stock isolates - Criminal investigation in progress
SOURCE Kolavic et al. JAMA 1997278396
44FEDERAL AGENCIES INVOLVED IN BIOTERRORISM
- NSC
- DOD
- FEMA
- DOJ
- DHHS
- Treasury
- EPA
- FBI
- PHS
- CDC
- Secret Service
- USDA
- FDA
- SBCCOM
- USAMRIID
- OEP
45COST OF BIOTERRORISM
46AGENT TRANSMISSION
47 ROUTES OF INFECTION
- Skin
- Cuts
- Abrasions
- Mucosal membranes
48 ROUTES OF INFECTION
- Gastrointestinal
- Food
- Potentially significant route of delivery
- Secondary to either purposeful or accidental
exposure to aerosol - Water
- Capacity to affect large numbers of people
- Dilution factor
- Water treatment may be effective in removal of
agents
49ROUTES OF INFECTION
- Respiratory
- Inhalation of spores, droplets aerosols
- Aerosols most effective delivery method
- 1-5F droplet most effective
50MEDICAL RESPONSE TO BIOTERRORISM
51MEDICAL RESPONSE
- Pre-exposure
- active immunization
- prophylaxis
- identification of threat/use
52MEDICAL RESPONSE
- Incubation period
- diagnosis
- active and passive immunization
- antimicrobial or supportive therapy
53MEDICAL RESPONSE
- Overt disease
- diagnosis
- treatment
- may not be available
- may overwhelm system
- may be less effective
- direct patient care will predominate
54PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO BIOTERRORISM
55PRIORITIES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS
- Emergency Preparedness and Response
- Enhance Surveillance and Epidemiology
- Enhance Laboratory Capacity
- Enhance Information Technology
- Stockpile
56COMPONENTS OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO
BIOTERRORISM
- Detection - Health Surveillance
- Rapid Laboratory Diagnosis
- Epidemiologic Investigation
- Implementation of Control
Measures
57LABORATORY RESPONSE NETWORK FOR BIOTERRORISM
D - Highest level characterization (Federal)
Level D Lab BSL-4
C - Molecular assays, reference capacity
Level C Lab BSL-3
B - Limited confirmation and Transport
Level B Lab BSL-2 facility BSL-3 Safety
Practices
A - Rule-out and forward organisms
Level-A Lab Use Class II Biosafety Cabinet
58CDC BT RAPID RESPONSE AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LAB
- BSL -3
- Agent Identification and Specimen Triage
- Refer to and Assist Specialty Lab Confirmation
- Evaluate Rapid Detection Technology
- Rapid Response Team
59BIOTERRORISMWhat Can Be Done?
- Awareness
- Laboratory Preparedness
- Plan in place
- Individual collective protection
- Detection characterization
60BIOTERRORISMWhat Can Be Done?
- Emergency response
- Measures to Protect the Publics Health and
Safety - Treatment
- Safe practices
61BIOTERRORISM AND THE PUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR
- CONCLUSIONS
- Preparation for a biological mass disaster
requires coordination of diverse groups of
medical and non-medical personnel - Preparation can not occur without support and
participation by all levels of government - Preparation must be a sustained and evolutionary
process
62Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response
ProgramCenters for Disease Control and
Prevention
63(No Transcript)