ROBOT SAFETY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

ROBOT SAFETY

Description:

PRESSURE SENSITIVE FLOOR MATS --- ARE AREA PADS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AROUND THE ... INDICATOR LIGHTS WILL BE ON WHEN THERE IS POWER TO THE ACTUATORS. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1825
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ved7
Category:
Tags: robot | safety | mat | power

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ROBOT SAFETY


1
ROBOT SAFETY
  • OBJECTIVES
  • BE ACQUAINTED WITH ROBOITIC SAFETY.
  • UNDERSTASND SFETY STANDARD.
  • RECOGNISE SAFETY RELIABILITY.
  • BE FAMILIAR WITH HUMAN FACTOR ISSUES.
  • BE AWARE OF SAFETY SENSORS AND MONITORING.
  • REALIZE SAFEGAURDING.
  • PERCEIVE THE IMPORTANT FACTORS OF TRAINING.
  • APPREHEND SAFETY GUIDELINES.
  • UNDERSTAND DEFINITIONS.
  • SAFETY METHOD AND TECHNIQUE USED FOR AVOIDING
    ACCIDENTS.
  • INCLUDES THE USUAL CONSIDERATIONS OF MAN, MACHINE
    AND WORKSTATIONS, ENVIRONMENT, AND THE INTERDFACE
    BEHAVIOUR, BUT IT MUST ALSO CONSIDER SOFTWARE.

2
ROBOTS AND CONVENTIONAL MACHINERY
  • THREE MAJOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ROBOTS AND
    CONVENTIONAL MACHINERY CAN BE IDENTIFIED THAT ARE
    CONCERN OF SAFETY PERSONNEL.
  • SPEED OF MOVEMENT.
  • PREDICTABILITY OF MOVEMENT.
  • HAZARD ZONES.
  • IN CONVENTIONAL MACHINERY HAZARD ZONES MAY BE
    DIFFICULT TO RECOGNIZE, BUT ARE FIXED WITH TIME.
  • ALSO THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL
    MACHINERY AND ROBOT IS THAT A ROBOT CAN BE
  • PROGRAMMED TO DO DIFFERENT JOBS.
  • REACT TO CHANGES IN THE PROCESS, EVEN MAKING
    DECISIONS FROM A LIMITED NUMBER OF CHOICES.
  • SAFETY ENGINEERING SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ROBOT
    SAFETY, PARTICULARLY IN THE HUMAN FACTORS ASPECTS
    AND SYSTEMS SAFETY APPROACHES.
  • ROBOT SAFETY MUST INCLUDE THE USUAL
    CONSIDERATIONS OF MAN, MACHINE AND WORKSTATIONS,
    ENVIRONMENT, AND THE INTERFACE BEHAVIOR, BUT IT
    MUST ALSO CONSIDER SOFTWARE

3
CAUSES OF ACCIDENTS
  • ENGINEERING DEFICIENCY
  • LACK OF PROPER PROCEDURES
  • INADEQUATE PROGRAMMING
  • EMERGENCY STOP SWITCHES MUST APPEAR ON THE
    CONTROL PANEL AND ALSO BE ADDED TO THE PENDANT
    USED IN THE TEACH MODE WHERE THE OPERATOR OR
    PROGRAMMER MAY BE MOVING IN THE ROBOTS WORK
    ENVELOPE.
  • COMPREHENSIVE INSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
    PROCEDURES MUST ALSO BE INCORPORATED THROUGH
    TRAINING PROGRAMS.

4
(No Transcript)
5
SAFETY STANDARDS
  • SAFETY IS AN IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION IN
    INSTALLING, PROGRAMMING, OPERATING, AND
    MAINTAINING ROBOT SYSTEMS.
  • SAFETY CAN ALSO BE CONSIDERED AS A JUDGMENT OF
    THE ACCEPTABILITY OF DANGER, WHERE DANGER IS THE
    COMBINATION OF HAZARD AND RISK.
  • HAZARD IS DEFINED AS INJURY PRODUCER, AND RISK IS
    DEFINED AS THE PROBABILITY THAT AN INJURY WILL
    OCCUR.
  • THE CAUSES OF EMPLOYEE INJURY IN ROBOTIC
    ENVIRONMENT INCLUDES
  • PARTS OF THE BODY BEING CAUGHT.
  • BEING STRUCK BY A PART OR ROBOT GRIPPER.
  • FALLING FROM THE EQUIPMENT OR STRUCTURE.
  • SLIPPING OR TRIPPING ON WALKING OR WORKING
    SURFACES.
  • EXPOSURE TO DANGEROUS LEVELS OF HEAT OR
    ELECTRICITY
  • EXCESSIVE PHYSICAL STRAIN

6
  • SAFETY STANDARDS ARE VERY IMPORTANT IN THE
    WORKPLACE. ALL THE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS HAVE
    DEFINED THE FOLLOWING PRIORITIES FOR ELIMINATING
    HAZARDS.
  • ELIMINATE THE HAZARD THROUGH THE MACHINE DESIGN
    STAGE.
  • APPLY SAFEGUARDING TECHNOLOGY.
  • USE WARNING SIGNS AND LABELS.
  • TRAIN AND INSTRUCT THE WORKER, PROGRAMMER, AND
    MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL.
  • PRESCRIBE PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND
    DEVICES.

7
HUMAN FACTOR ISSUES
  • HUMAN FACTOR(ERGONOMICS) ISSUES OR ENGINEERING IS
    THE STUDY OF THE HUMAN-MACHINE INTERACTION AND IS
    DEFINED AS AN APPLIED SCIENCE THAT COORDINATES
    THE DESIGN OF DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND PHYSICAL
    WORKING CONDITIONS WITH THE CAPACITIES AND
    REQUIREMENTS OF THE WORKER.
  • A MACHINE OR ROBOT SYSTEM DESIGNED WITH POOR
    ERGONOMICS WILL BE UNCOMFORTABLE AND TIRING TO
    USE, MAY EVEN BE DANGEROUS.
  • BESIDES THE SIZE OF A ROBOTS WORK ENVELOPE, ITS
    SPEED, ITS PROXIMITY TO HUMANS, AND INTERACTION
    WITH OTHER MACHINERY, MANY OTHER FACTORS SHOULD
    BE CONSIDERED AND INVESTIGATED SUCH AS
  • THE LAYOUT OF CONTROL PANELS.
  • TEACH-PENDANT ACCURACY.
  • PERSONNEL TRAINING
  • BARRIER GUARDS.
  • SAFETY DEVICES.
  • INTERLOCKS.
  • WARNINGS
  • IN ADDITION HUMAN FACTOR ISSUES SHOULD INCLUDE
    EVALUATION OF A ROBOT WORKSTATIONS WHEN AN
    OPERATOR ENTERS THE WORKSTATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE,
    PROGRAMMING, AND THE LIKE.

8
SAFETY SENSORS AND MONITORING
  • SAFETY MONITORING INVOLVES THE USE OF SENSORS TO
    INDICATE CONDITIONS OR EVENTS THAT ARE UNSAFE OR
    POTENTIALLY UNSAFE.
  • THE OBJECTIVE OF SAFETY MONITORING INCLUDES NOT
    ONLY THE PROTECTION OF HUMANS WHO HAPPEN TO BE IN
    THE CELL, BUT ALSO THE PROTECTION OF THE
    EQUIPEMENT IN THE CELL.
  • THE SENSORS USED IN THE SAFETY MONITORING RANGE
    FROM THE SIMPLE LIMIT SWITCHES TO SOPHISTICATED
    VISION SYSTEM THAT ARE ABLE TO SCAN THE WORKPLACE
    FOR INTRUDERS AND OTHER DEVIATIONS FROM THE
    NORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS.
  • GREAT CARE MUST BE TAKEN IN WORKCELL DESIGN TO
    ANTICIPATE ALL POSSIBLE MISHAPS THAT MIGHT OCCUR
    DURING THE OPERATION OF THE CELL, AND TO DESIGN
    SAFEGAURDS TO PREVENT OR LIMIT THE DAMAGE
    RESULTING FROM THESE MISHAPS.

9
LEVELS OF ROBOT SAFETY
  • THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS DEFINES THREE
    LEVELS OF SAFETY SENSOR SYSTEMS IN ROBOTS.
  • LEVEL 1 --- PERIMETER PENETRATION DETECTION.
  • LEVEL 2 --- INTRUDER DETECTION INSIDE THE
    WORKCELL
  • LEVEL 3 --- INTRUDER DETECTION IN THE IMMEDIATE
    VICINITY OF THE ROBOT.
  • LEVEL 1 SYSTEMS ARE INTENDED TO DETECT THAT AN
    INTRUDER HAS CROSSED THE PERIMETER BOUNDARY OF
    THE WORKCELL WITHOUT REGARD TO THE LOCATION OF
    THE ROBOT.
  • LEVEL 2 SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED TO DETECT THE
    PRESENCE OF AN INTRUDER IN THE REGION BETWEEN THE
    WORKCELL BOUNDARY AND THE LIMIT OF THE ROBOT WORK
    VOLUME.
  • LEVEL 3 SYSTEMS PROVIDE INTRUDER DETECTION INSIDE
    THE WORK VOLUME OF THE ROBOT.

10
(No Transcript)
11
  • THERE ARE TWO COMMON MEANS OF IMPLEMENTING A
    ROBOT SAFETY SENSING SYSTEM
  • PRESSURE SENSITIVE FLOOR MATS --- ARE AREA PADS
    PLACED ON THE FLOOR AROUND THE WORKCELL THAT
    SENSE THE WEIGHT OF SOMEONE STANDING ON THE MAT.
    THESE CAN BE USED FOR EITHER LEVEL1 OR LEVEL2
    SENSING SYSTEMS.
  • LIGHT CURTAIN --- CONSISTS OF LIGHT BEAMS AND
    PHOTSENSITIVE DEVICES PLACED AROUND THE WORKCELL
    THAT SENSE THE PRESENCE OF AN INTRUDER BY AN
    INTRRUPTION OF THE LIGHT BEAM. USE OF LIGHT
    CURTAINS WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE AS LEVEL1
    SYSTEMS.

12
  • PROXIMITY SENSORS LOCATED ON THE ROBOT ARM COULD
    BE UTILIZED AS LEVEL 3 SENSORS.
  • THE SAFETY MONITORIN STRATEGIES THAT MIGHT BE
    FOLLOWED BY THE WORKCELL CONTROLLER WOULD INCLUDE
    THE FOLLOWING SCHEMES.
  • COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF THE ROBOT UPON DETECTION OF
    AN INTRUDER.
  • ACTIVATION OF WARNING ALARMS.
  • REDUCTION OF THE SPEED OF THE ROBOT TO SAFE
    LEVEL.
  • DIRECTING THE ROBOT TO MOVE ITS ARM AWAY FROM THE
    INTRUDER TO AVOID COLLISION.
  • DIRECTING THE ROBOT TO PERFORM TASKS AWAY FROM
    THE INTRUDER.
  • NOTE THERE IS ANOTHER SAFETY MONITORING CALLED A
    FAIL-SAFE HAZARD DETECTOR. THE CONCEPT OF THIS
    DETECTOR IS BASED ON THE RECOGNITION THAT SOME
    COMPONENT OF BASIC HAZARD SENSOR SYSTEM MIGHT
    FAIL AND THAT THIS FAILURE MIGHT NOT BE FOUND OUT
    UNTIL SOME SAFETY EMERGENCY OCCURRED. THE
    FAIL-SAFE HAZARD DETECTOR IS DESIGNED TO OVERCOME
    THIS PROBLEM.

13
SAFEGUARDING
  • MOST INDUSTRAIL ACCIDENTS OCCUR ARE THE RESULTS
    OF UNSAFE ACTS BY THE WORKER. UCH ACTS CAN OCCUR
    DUE TO
  • IMPROPERLY TRAINED OPERATORS.
  • CARELESS PROGRAMMERS ACTIVATING THE WRONG
    CONTROLS.
  • COMPONENT FAILURE OR OTHER UNSAFE CONDITIONS IN
    THE PLANT.
  • MAJOR CONCERN IN SAFETY OF ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED
    WITH INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS IS VERY IMPORTANT.
  • ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL(1991)
    THE PRINCIPAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH ROBOTS ARE
    AS FOLLOWS
  • BEING STRUCK BY A MOVING ROBOT WHILE INSIDE THE
    WORK ENVELOPE.
  • 2. BEING TRAPPED BETWEEN A MOVING PART OF A ROBOT
    AND ANOTHER MACHINE, OBJECT, OR SURFACE.
  • 3. BEING STRUCK BY A WORKPIECE, TOOL, OR OTHER
    OBJECT DROPPED OR EJJECTED BY A ROBOT.

14
SAFEGUARDING (CONTD.)
  • ROBOT SAFEGUARD
  • TO ERECT A PHYSICAL BARRIER AROUND THE ENTIRE
    PERIMETER OF A ROBOTS WORK ENVELOPE.
  • A GUARD CONTAINING A SENSING DEVICE THAT
    AUTOMATICALLY SHUTS DOWN THE ROBOT IF ANY PERSON
    OR OBJECT ENTERS ITS WORK ENVELOPE CAN BE
    EFFECTIVE.
  • TO PUT SENSITIZED DOORS OR GATES IN THE PERIMETER
    BARRIER THAT AUTOMATICALLY SHUT DOWN THE ROBOTS
    MOVEMENT WHEN THEY ARE OPENED.

15
  • SAFEGUARDING (CONTD.)
  • EVEN THOUGH IT IS DIFFICULT TO GO TO A RISK-FREE
    ENVIRONMENT BECAUSE THER IS ALWAYS THE
    POSSIBILITY OF A MALFUNCTION OR THE VIOLATION OF
    GOOD SAFETY PRACTICES. HOWEVER, THERE ARE WAYS TO
    MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL OF THESE ERRORS
  • SAFETY TRAINING
  • DEPENDABLE MACHINE DESIGN
  • HIGH-RELIABILITY CONTROLS
  • PROPER LAYOUT WORK AREA.
  • SAFE POSITION AND CLEAR VISIBILITY FOR
    PROGRAMMING.
  • ESTABILISHING PROPER MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES.
  • ADEQUATE INSTALLATION PERFORMED IN THE PRESENCE
    OF SAFETY PERSONNEL.
  • OBEYING SAFETY RULES AND REGULATIONS OF
    AUTHORITATIVE ORGANIZATIONS.

16
SAFETY GUIDLINES
  • THE UNEXPECTED ROBOT MOVEMENTS ARE THE CONCERN OF
    EMPLOYEES FOR OBTAINING FURTHER GUIDELINES ON
    ROBOTICS SAFETY.
  • RESEARCHERS HAVE DEVELOPED MANY GUIDELINES
    PERTAINING TO SAFETY ISSUES IN ROBOTS.
  • FOLLOWING GUIDELINES ARE FOR SAFE USE OF ROBOTS
    IN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT
  • IF THE ROBOT IS NOT MOVING, DO NOT ASSUME IT IS
    NOT GOING TO MOVE.
  • IF THE ROBOT IS REPEATING PATTERN, DO NOT ASSUME
    IT WILL CONTINUE.
  • ALWAYS BE AWARE OF WHERE YOU ARE IN RELATIONSHIP
    TO THE POSSIBLE POSITIONS THAT THE ROBOT MAY
    REACH.

17
(No Transcript)
18
SAFETY GUIDELINES (CONTD.)
  • 4. BE AWARE IF THERE IS POWER ACTUATORS.
    INDICATOR LIGHTS WILL BE ON WHEN THERE IS POWER
    TO THE ACTUATORS.
  • 5. TEACHING, PROGRAMMING, SERVICING, AND
    MAINTENANCE ARE THE ONLY AUTHORIZED REASONS FOR
    ENTRY INTO THE WORK ENVELOPE.
  • 6. BEFORE ACTIVATING POWER TO THE ROBOT,
    EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE AWARE OF WHAT IT IS
    PROGRAMMED TO DO, THAT ALL SAFEGUARDS ARE IN
    PLACE, AND THAT NO FOREIGN MATERIALS ARE PRESENT
    WITHING THE WORK ENVELOPE.
  • 7. NOTIFY SUPERVISION IMMEDIATELY WHEN AN
    UNEXPECTED INTERRUPTION TO THE NORMAL ROBOT WORK
    CYCLE OCCURS.
  • 8. REPORT ANY MISSING OF DEFECTIVE SAFEGUARD TO
    SUPERVISION IMMEDIATELY. CHECK ALL SAFEGUARDS AT
    THE BEGINNING OT EACH SHIFT.

19
SUMMARY
  • SAFETY IS AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT IN INDUSTRIAL
    AUTOMATION.
  • ROBOT SAFETY DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF THE ROBOTS
    WORK ENVELOPE, ITS SPEED, AND ITS PROXIMITY TO
    HUMANS.
  • SAFETY SENSORS AND MONITORING PROVIDE THE
    CAPABILITY OF THE WORKCELL CONTROLLER AND ITS
    SENSORS TO MONITOR THE OPERATION DURING UNSAFE
    CONDITIONS IN THE CELL.
  • SAFEGUARDING IS THE PREVENTION OF INJURY OR
    ACCIDENT IN THE WORKPLACE.
  • TRAINING IS A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE SUCCESSFUL
    IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY IN A
    COMPANY OR OPERATION.
  • SAFETY GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED BY
    RESEARCHERS PERTAINING TO SAFETY ISSUES IN ROBOTS
    TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ACCIDENTS IN A PRODUCTION
    ENVIRONMENT.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com