BSAC Annual Budget Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

BSAC Annual Budget Analysis

Description:

BSAC Annual Budget Analysis – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:220
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: schm92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BSAC Annual Budget Analysis


1
BSAC Annual Budget Analysis
  • Three issues discussed
  • Current Budget
  • Investments in the Future
  • Future Budgets
  • A couple of things before starting
  • Big Issues
  • UBs plans

2
Budget and Enrollment
  • Two components of our budget
  • State allocation--BAP Model discussion
  • Enrollment main driving force
  • Tuition revenues
  • Enrollments drive overall budget
  • UB initiative is an opportunity for BSC
  • BSCs distinctiveness
  • 75 of courses lt30 students taught by Scholars
    in the classroom

3
Enrollment Target
  • Historically targets determined by FM
  • Driven by finances more students more
  • EM and Capacity Model
  • Early runs estimate about 10,800 (?).
  • Determining capacity? Example--economics
  • Enrollment targeta big issue
  • BSCs potential.
  • New strategic planning process A goal Become
    the best comprehensive college in SUNY and most
    diverse.
  • This of course will take resourcesoutlook?

4
Next Years Budget
  • Depends on who wins E-target discussion.
  • SUNY Budget proposal is ambitious
  • 65 full-time faculty is goal
  • State budget situation
  • 4-5 billion deficit projected
  • Issue How to become best (and increase
    faculty) without increasing enrollment?
  • If State finances SUNY request, no problem if
    not, how can we generate more resources?
  • Game the BAP model

5
Other FundingEfficiencies?
  • Faculty issues
  • 50 are the doers
  • Differential teaching loads
  • 2. Cutting the bureaucracy
  • I was thereit can be done.
  • 3. We need Transparency in Budget Allocation
    Process and how priorities are set.
  • Difficulty getting data to analyze where goes?

6
Budget Allocation wheres the go?
  • VP Area 2001/02 2005/06 Change
  • AA 35,274.50 38,740.50 9.8 (9.3)
  • FM 13,597.70 15,286.40 12.4
  • SA 2,503.70 2,614.70 4.4
  • IA 992.50 1,030.70 3.8
  • Pres 744.20 798.60 7.3
  • Total 53,112.60 58,470.90 10.1
  • (Actual budget) 67,190.1
  • Notes
  • Budget allocations by vp area, not tot budget
  • Reorganization in 2006/07 (CIO)
  • Strategic Planning moved from Pres to AA

7
Share of total allocation
  • VP Area 2001/02 2005/06
  • AA 66.4 65.9 (-.5)
  • FM 25.6 26.1 (.5)
  • SA 4.7 4.5
  • IA 1.9 1.8
  • Pres 1.4 1.8
  • 100 100
  • Note Strategic Planning moved.

8
Past two years
  • VP Area 2006/07 2007/08 Change
  • AA 34,370.00 38,350.90 11.6
  • FM 12,664.40 14,005.30 10.6
  • IT 7,024.50 7,190.80 2.4
  • SA 5,983.9 6,166.10 3.0
  • IA 1,201.5 1,540.6 28.2
  • Pres 840.50 876.90 4.3
  • Total 62,084.80 68,130.40 9.7
  • Tot Bud 76,373.2 80,191.40 5.0
  • Note State proportion 45 of total this year.

9
Budget Priorities
  • How are priorities set?
  • Budget Priorities Task Force
  • Last year
  • This year
  • Strategic Planning Process
  • Put some meat in SP process.
  • Goal of 65 F-T fac.
  • How many over next 5 years? Cost? How to finance?

10
Conclusion
  • UBs plan gives us a chance to define who we are.
  • Senate needs to be involved in these big
    issues. (Enrollment target/Goal to be best!)
  • 17.5 more years
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com