Title: Chapter Outline
1Chapter Outline
- Principals of Business Valuation
- Valuation Formula
- Components of the Opportunity Cost of Capital
- Compensation for Risk
- Risk Management and the Opportunity Cost of
Capital
2Chapter Outline
- Risk Management and Expected Cash Flows
- Insurance Premium Loadings
- Insurance with No Loading
- Insurance with a Loading
- Services Provided by Insurers
- Insurance and the Likelihood of Having to Raise
Costly External Funds - Raising New Funds to Pay for Losses
- Increased Likelihood of Raising New Funds
- for New Investment Projects
- Insurance and Financial Distress
- Manager Compensation Example
- Implications for Other Claimants
- Financial Distress Prior to Bankruptcy
-
3Objective of Corporate Risk Management
- Recall Objective
- Maximize Value to Shareholders
-
- Basic question addressed in this chapter
- Does reducing risk (variability in cash flows)
increase equity value? - Considering that shareholders can diversify on
their own - Answer yes, but it is important to understand
why
4The Basic Valuation Model
- Valuation Model
- Value PV(expected cash flows)
- Value
- where r opportunity cost of capital
- Key Issues
- How does risk management affect
- Expected Cash Flows?
- Opportunity cost of capital?
5The Basic Valuation Model - An Example
- Assumptions
- Firm exists for one year
- 300 if no lawsuit
- Cash flows at end of year
- 100 if lose a lawsuit
- Outcomes are equally likely
- Opportunity cost of capital 10
- Value at beginning of year 200/1.1 182
- Value at end of year 300 or 100, depending on
the outcome
6Components of the Cost of Capital
- Opportunity cost of capital
- expected return you could earn on an
alternative investment - with the same risk
- return on risk free securities expected
return for risk - risk free rate a risk premium
7Investor Diversification and the Risk Premium
- Intuitively, the risk premium should reflect the
risk of the cash flows - riskier cash flows gt higher risk premium
- However, investors can diversify some risk on
their own - Divide cash flow risk into two components
- Total Risk diversifiable risk
nondiversifiable risk - Risk premium only depends on nondiversifiable risk
8Investor Diversification and the Risk Premium
- Summary
- Total risk of cash flows
- Diversifiable risk
Nondiversifiable risk - does not affect increases
- cost of capital cost of capital
- Other terms for nondiversifiable risk
- market risk
- systematic risk
9Does Insurance Affect the Cost of Capital?
- Insurance generally reduces diversifiable risk
- gt Insurance generally will not affect the
opportunity cost of capital
10Does Hedging Affect the Cost of Capital?
- The same analysis applies to hedging using
derivatives - If hedging only reduces diversifiable risk, then
hedging will not reduce the opportunity cost of
capital
11Hedging, Insurance, and Systematic Risk
- Hedging and insurance that reduces systematic
risk (non-diversifiable risk) will reduce the
opportunity cost of capital - However,
- Systematic risk must be borne by someone
- Thus, the counterparty who takes on the
additional systematic risk will require
compensation for bearing this risk
12Hedging, Insurance, and Systematic Risk
- The cost of compensating the counter-party will
cause expected cash flows to decrease - Thus, shifting systematic risk has two effects
- Lowers opportunity cost of capital
- Lowers expected cash flows
- Provided all parties value the cost of bearing
systematic risk identically, then the two effects
will offset each other and firm value will not
change
13Why do Corporations Reduce Risk?
- So why do firms reduce risk that shareholders can
diversify themselves? - Two possible explanations
-
- 1. Owners are not diversified (closely-held
companies) - 2. Risk reduction indirectly increases expected
cash flows
14Overview of the Effects of Insurance on Expected
Cash Flows
- Description Effect on Expected Cash
Flows - Pay loading Decrease
- Decrease cost of obtaining services Increase
- Decrease likelihood of having to raise
- new funds Increase
- Decrease likelihood of financial
distress Increase - Decrease expected tax payments Increase
- (examined in Ch. 10)
15Insurance Premium Loadings
- Example
- 100 with probability 0.9
- Cash flows
- 70 with probability 0.1
- I.e., Loss of 30 occurs with probability 0.1
- Expected cash flows w/o insurance 97
- Expected cash flows with insurance depends on the
insurance premium
16Insurance Premium Loadings
- Assume full insurance can be purchased for 3
- Then loading
- Expected cash flows with insurance
- Assume full insurance costs 4
- Then loading
- Expected cash flows with insurance
- Main Point Ignoring other factors, insurance
reduces expected cash flows by the premium loading
17Services Provided by Insurers
- But part of loading is the cost of services
- Loss control
- Claims processing
- Is premium loading less than cost of obtaining
services elsewhere? - Why bundle insurance with services?
18Likelihood of Raising Costly External Capital
- Raising external capital is costly
- Investment banker fees
- Underpricing costs
- If not insured (or hedged), then the firm has an
increased likelihood of having to raise new
capital - To pay losses that could have been insured
(hedged) - For new investment projects
- Cost of raising capital may make new projects
unprofitable - Firm foregoes what otherwise would have been
profitable new projects
19Insurance vs Raising New Funds to Pay for Losses
- What if uninsured loss exceeds available internal
funds? - Raise new funds (use future cash flows to pay the
loss) - Declare bankruptcy
- Example of Cather Inc.
- Normal cash flow 15 per share, but there is
0.9 chance of 20 per share loss - 15 with probability 0.9
- First year cash flows
- -5 with probability 0.1
- Second year cash flow 25 with probability 1.0
20Insurance vs Raising New Funds to Pay for Losses
- Important point
- Cather can issue equity (or borrow) against
future cash flows to pay the loss if it occurs - Is raising new funds (if a loss occurs) better
than purchasing insurance? - Answer must compare premium loading to the
expected cost of raising new funds
21Insurance vs Raising New Funds to Pay for Losses
- Suppose premium loading 20 of expected loss
- Expected loss 20 x 0.1 2 per share
- Premium loading 0.40 per share
- Suppose cost of issuing securities 25 of
amount raised - Probability of raising new funds 0.1
- Amount raised 20 per share
- Cost of raising funds 0.25 x 20 5 per share
- Expected cost of raising new funds 0.50 per
share - In this example, insurance is better
22Insurance and Raising New Funds for Investment
- Basic idea
- More insurance
- gt internal funds will not be used to pay
losses -
- gt more internal funds available for new
investment - projects
-
- gt less likely to raise costly external capital
-
- gt value of new projects is greater
-
- gt less likely to forego otherwise profitable
projects
23Decreasing the Likelihood of Financial Distress
- Likelihood of financial distress affects the
terms at which other claimants contract with the
firm - Other claimants require compensation for the risk
that the firm goes into financial distress - Less costly for the firm to reduce risk than it
is to compensate these other claimants for risk - Other claimants include employees, suppliers,
customers, and debtholders
24Decreasing the Likelihood of Financial Distress
- Why do other claimants require compensation for
the risk of financial distress? - They are risk averse and not diversified, e.g.,
- employees
- closely-held suppliers
- customers
- Bankruptcy imposes additional costs (above the
loss in promised payments), e.g., - Collection costs for lenders
- Search and moving costs for employees
- Loss in the value of specific investments for
suppliers
25Management Compensation Example
- J.R. works for Garven Corp.
- Garven Corps end of year cash flows without
insurance - 1 million with probability 0.95 and 0 with
probability 0.05 due to a lawsuit - If cash flows 0, then J.R. does not get paid
- J.R. would accept 100,000 in compensation if he
were certain to be paid - J.R. requires 125,000 given the uncertainty
about getting paid (expected compensation
118,750)
26Management Compensation Example
- Garven can purchase 400,000 of liability
insurance for 25,000 - expected claim cost .05 x 400,00 20,000
- gt premium loading 5,000
- Insurance allows J.R. to be paid even if a
lawsuit occurs - J.R. accepts 100,000
- Reduction in expected compensation 18,750
- Loading from the insurance 5,000
- Net increase in expected cash flows 13,750
27Management Compensation Example
- Main point insurance improved the contractual
terms with J.R. and therefore increased value to
the owners of Garven Corp. - Same logic applies to other claimants
28Investment Incentives of Firms in Financial
Distress
- Financial distress short of bankruptcy changes
owners investment incentives in ways that can
hurt other claimants - Therefore, decreasing the likelihood of financial
distress (short of bankruptcy) can also improve
contractual terms with other claimants - Investment incentives of owners of firms in
financial distress - Incentive to pass up good projects
(underinvestment problem) - Incentive to adopt risky bad projects
(overinvestment in risky assets problem)
29Underinvestment Problem
- Consider a firm in financial distress
- A good project (positive net present value) that
requires new funds arises - Owners may not want to invest their own money,
because a significant part of the returns from
the new project might accrue to other claimants - In essence, the new project bails out other
claimants
30Overinvestment in Risky Assets Problem
- Consider a firm in financial distress
- A bad project (negative net present value) with
considerable risk arises - chance of really high returns
- greater chance of low returns
- Owners may have an incentive to adopt the risky
project, because they have little to lose - If the project has low returns then owners will
get nothing, but they were likely to get nothing
anyway - If the project has high returns then owners will
get something
31Insurance and Investment Incentives
- Main point
- Decrease the likelihood of financial distress
gt - Decrease likelihood of underinvestment problem
- Decrease likelihood of overinvestment in risky
assets problem - gt improve the terms of contracts with other
claimants
32Summary of Why Firms Manage Risk
- Summary
- Reducing diversifiable risk does not reduce risk
for diversified shareholders, but - it can increase expected cash flows by
- reducing the costs of obtaining services
- avoiding costly external financing
- improving contractual terms with other claimants
- reducing expected tax payments