Title: CSCI3406 Fuzzy Logic and Knowledge Based Systems AI
1CSCI3406 Fuzzy Logic and Knowledge Based Systems
(AI)
Inferencing
2Introduction
- Inferencing is the 3rd stage of a KBS design and
often linked to reasoning - Inferencing is the process of deriving correct
appropriate answers and drawing correct
conclusions for problems from knowledge that is
maintained in a KBS - There are different types of Inferencing
- In this lecture we cover some of the most popular
and commonly used types of Inferencing
3Topics of Discussion
- Basic Components
- Backward chaining
- Forward chaining
- Opportunistic Inferencing
- Logical Inferencing
- Closed World Assumption (CWA)
- Logical contradiction
- Other techniques
4Basic Components
- An Expert System can be described as
- Expert system
- inference engine
- knowledge base
- working memory
- (external) data
5Basic Components The knowledge base
- The knowledge base contains the know-how of the
human experts in a particular field. Such
know-how is of two types - Facts - "deep knowledge".
- Heuristics - "surface knowledge".
- Knowledge base is derived and implemented by
means of knowledge acquisition and representation.
6Basic Components The knowledge base Heuristics
- Heuristic - a strategy to find the solution to a
problem which is not guaranteed to work. - One sort of heuristic usually gives you the right
answer but sometimes gives you the wrong answer - Another sort gives you an answer which isnt 100
accurate.
7Basic Components The knowledge base Heuristics
- Humans use heuristics a great deal in their
problem solving. Of course, if the heuristic does
fail, it is necessary for the problem solver to
either pick another heuristic, or know that it is
appropriate to give up. - The rules, found in the knowledge bases of
rule-based systems, are very often heuristics.
8Basic Components The inference engine
- The inference engine has two primary tasks
- Inference the inference engine employs reasoning
to examine existing facts and rules. It also
updates stored knowledge and draws conclusions. - Control the inference engine's mechanism for
controlling the search of the knowledge base.
9Basic Components Working memory
- An area of the Computer's RAM reserved for
storing information regarding the current status
of the problem e.g. conclusions reached so far,
data input by the user and details of items
within the knowledge base which have been checked.
10Basic Components External Data Source
- Some expert systems receive input data from
external sources other than the user. Common
forms of this data - known as sensor data
include some biomedical test results (e.g., red
cell count in blood), audible sounds and visual
images. The system interprets the data and makes
inferences based on that data.
11Inference in a KBS
- Two control strategies
- forward chaining
- backward chaining
12Backward chaining
- Backward chaining from the conclusion to the
facts. Sometimes called a goal-driven approach - To chain backward, match a goal in working memory
against 'conclusions' of rules in the rule-base.
We start from an expectation of what is to happen
(hypothesis), then seek evidence that
supports (or contradicts) your expectation. - When one of them fires, this is liable to produce
more goals. - So the cycle continues.
- Often this entails formulating and
testing intermediate hypotheses (or
sub-hypotheses). - Backward chaining may use either depth first and
breadth first search algorithms
13Backward chaining
- Example
- IF
- Customer wants comfort and Customer has
enough_money - THEN
- Salesperson recommends Rolls Royce
- And assume you are the sales person, and your
question is do I recommend Rolls Royce to this
customer or not?
14Forward chaining
- Forward chaining working from the facts to a
conclusion. Sometimes called a data-driven approac
h. - In this approach we start from available
information as it comes in, or from a basic idea,
then try to draw conclusions. - The computer analyses the problem by looking for
the facts that match the IF portion of its
IF-THEN rules.
15Forward chaining
- If we take the sales person example again,
forward chaining would be the approach to use if
the question was the customer wants comfort and
has enough money, what shall I recommend to him?
16Backward and Forward chaining
- Here are two rules
- If corn is grown on poor soil, then it will rot.
- If soil hasn't enough nitrogen, then it is poor
soil. - Forward chaining This soil is low in nitrogen
therefore this is poor soil therefore corn grown
on it will rot. - Backward chaining This corn is rotten therefore
it must have been grown on poor soil therefore
the soil must be low in nitrogen.
17Forward chaining
- More realistically,
- the forward chaining reasoning would be there's
something wrong with this corn. So I test the
soil. It turns out to be low in nitrogen. If
thats the case, corn grown on it will rot.
Therefore the problem is rot caused by low
nitrogen.
18Backward chaining
- More realistically,
- the backward chaining reasoning would be there's
something wrong with this corn. Perhaps it is
rotten if so, it must have been grown on poor
soil if so, the soil must be low in nitrogen. So
test for low nitrogen content in soil, and then
we'll know whether the problem is rot.
19Forward backward chaining
- The choice of strategy depends on the nature of
the problem. - Assume the problem is to get from facts to a goal
(e.g. symptoms to a diagnosis).
20Forward backward chaining
- Backward chaining is the best choice if
- The goal is given in the problem statement, or
can sensibly be guessed at the beginning of the
consultation - or
- The system has been built so that it sometimes
asks for pieces of data (e.g. "please now do the
gram test on the patient's blood, and tell me the
result"), rather than expecting all the facts to
be presented to it.
21Forward backward chaining
- Backward chaining
- This is because (especially in the medical
domain) the test may be - expensive,
- or unpleasant,
- or dangerous for the human participant
- so one would want to avoid doing such a test
unless there was a good reason for it.
22Forward backward chaining
- Forward chaining is the best choice if
- All the facts are provided with the problem
statement - or
- There are many possible goals, and a smaller
number of patterns of data - or
- There isn't any sensible way to guess what the
goal is at the beginning of the consultation.
23Forward backward chaining
- Note also that
- a backwards-chaining system tends to produce a
sequence of questions which seems focussed and
logical to the user, - a forward-chaining system tends to produce a
sequence which seems random unconnected. - If it is important that the system should seem to
behave like a human expert, backward chaining is
probably the best choice.
24Forward backward chaining
- Some systems use mixed chaining, where some of
the rules are specifically used for chaining
forwards, and others for chaining backwards. The
strategy is for the system to chain in one
direction, then switch to the other direction, so
that - the diagnosis is found with maximum efficiency
- the system's behaviour is perceived as "human".
25Backward and Forward
- Both backward and forward chaining techniques
have their advantages and disadvantages and are
often used in permutations. - Compare advantages and disadvantages of both
techniques. - When this happens, a technique that is called
opportunistic Inferencing is used.
26Opportunistic Inferencing
- The idea behind opportunistic Inferencing is that
some asserted facts in the working memory might
lead to the firing of set of rules, which leads
to speed up the Inferencing process. - The Inferencing engine in FUZZYCLIPS can be used
27Logical Inferencing
- Logical Inferencing, which is sometimes referred
to as problem solver or automated proof system,
uses the logical representation to derive or
entail conclusions. - Logic Inferencing is usually computationally
complicated. Therefore, several assumptions are
used in logic Inferencing. - The most famous assumption that is often used in
logic-based models and systems is Closed World
Assumption (CWA).
28Closed World Assumption (CWA)
- CWA assumes that the logical system is closed and
therefore there are no possible external effects
to change the composition of this system. - As a result anything that cannot be proved to be
true in the model we can assume that it is be
false. - This sometimes leads to difficulties, for an
example, missing symptoms of an illness does not
necessary that the patient does not have that
illness. However, that is exactly what the system
may conclude using the closed world assumption.
29More Logical Inferencing
- There are several logic-based models e.g.
default logic, non-monotonic logic and situation
calculus. - The logic-models are often very complicated to
be translated into computable models. - We always seek that our models are sound and
complete. - What do you think we mean by soundness and
completeness?
30Logical contradiction
- One of the weaknesses, beside complexity, is that
the logic-based systems suffer from is usually
Logical Contradiction. - Logical contradiction happens when the system,
for example, allows us to entail X and not X at
the same time. Sometimes logical contradiction is
defined within the context of KBS to be the case
in which the system reaches a conclusion that is
known by the user to be false.
31Other Inferencing techniques
- There are several Inferencing techniques may be
used depending on the system domain. Here are
some of the commonly used techniques
- Model-based reasoning.
- Case-based reasoning.
- Monotonic and non-monotonic reasoning.
- Truth maintenance systems.
- Hypothetical reasoning.
- Analogical reasoning.
- Procedural reasoning.
- Hierarchical reasoning.
- Inductive and deductive reasoning.
- Pattern matching.
32Conclusion
- In this lecture we looked at the 3rd aspect of
knowledge based systems, namely, Inferencing. - There are different types of Inferencing (e.g.,
backward forward chaining/ inferencing and
logical inferencing) - Search algorithms are often used in Inferencing.
33References
- Lecture notes part 2.
- E. Turban, Expert Systems and Applied Artificial
Intelligence. New York Macmillan Publishing
Company, 1992.
34Next Steps
- Next
- Modelling uncertainty