DISSOCIATIVE RECOMBINATION KINETICS RELATED TO PLASMA ENHANCED COMBUSTION July 15 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

DISSOCIATIVE RECOMBINATION KINETICS RELATED TO PLASMA ENHANCED COMBUSTION July 15 2004

Description:

DISSOCIATIVE RECOMBINATION KINETICS RELATED TO PLASMA ENHANCED COMBUSTION. July 15 2004 ... Neutral-neutral reactions often immeasurably slow ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:200
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: sarl97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DISSOCIATIVE RECOMBINATION KINETICS RELATED TO PLASMA ENHANCED COMBUSTION July 15 2004


1
DISSOCIATIVE RECOMBINATION KINETICS RELATED TO
PLASMA ENHANCED COMBUSTION July 15 2004
  • PIs
  • Albert Viggiano
  • Space Vehicles Directorate
  • Air Force Research Laboratory
  • Hanscom AFB
  • Mats Larsson
  • University of Stockholm

2
Outline
  • Motivation
  • Plasma enhanced combustion
  • Technique
  • Results
  • C2Hn n 1-5
  • C3H7 , C4H9 , C3H4
  • Acknowledgements

3
Combustion for Hypersonic Vehicles (gt Mach 4-5)
  • AF has an interest in high-speed airbreathing
    propulsion
  • There are claims that plasmas speed combustion
  • It is known that trace additives affect
    combustion chemistry
  • ? It is reasonable to expect plasmas will
  • May be an enabling technology for hypersonic
  • airbreathing propulsion using hydrocarbon fuels
  • Plasma ignition and flameholding
  • MHD mixing

4
Technical Approach
Lab Results (VS, CRYRING)
Models and Codes (VS/PR)
System Impacts (PR)
5
Create Reaction Database for Plasma Enhanced
Combustion
  • In house laboratory study ion-molecule
    reactions
  • Starting materials mainly studied
  • Fuels C1-C12 Straight-Chain Alkanes
  • C4-C8 Branched-Chain Alkanes
  • C6-C10 Aromatics (Alkylbenzenes, Naphthalene
  • Positive Ions - NO, O2, N2, O, N, H3O,
    H3O(H2O)
  • Negative Ions - O-, O2-, CO3-, NO3-,
  • Byproducts just starting
  • Secondary Ions - CnHm CnHmO etc.
  • Fuel components CO, O, O3, O2, CO2 etc.
  • High pressure chemistry thermal dissociation
    and stabilizaiton (Troe)
  • University of Stockholm
  • Termination dissociation recombination
  • e- AB ? A B
  • Important question is how many radicals are
    produced

6
Problem in Scramjet Engines
Ignition Delay, tig L / v
t
Ignition Delay Effect,
t
7
Plasma Enhanced Combustion Model Results Assumes
CnHm e ? CnHm-1 H
  • CH3, H, O, and OH are equally effective at
    reducing computed ignition delay time
  • H3O C are more effective
  • NO/e- is the most effective for isooctane and
    the mixture whereas H3O/e- is more effective for
    ethylbenzene
  • Key effects
  • Production of atomic and radical species
  • -in large part by dissociative recombination
  • -standard assumption is H atom ejected
  • Heat Release
  • Fuel breakdown
  • Models due to Skip Williams

Computed Ignition Delay Time (ms)
Mixture
8
C
7
CH
3
H
6
O
OH
5

-
NO
/e

-
H
0
/e
4
3
Ionization levels gt 10-6 are effective in
reducing the ignition delay time.
-6
-5
-4
-3
10
10
10
10
Species Mole Fraction
8
In-House Laboratory
  • Initially measured air plasma ions with fuel
    components
  • Starting to measure oxidation reactions (O3, O2,
    O, O2 (1D))
  • Need to measure HC - HC,
  • e.g. hydride transfer can lead to catalytic
    cycles
  • State-of-the-art, unique instruments
  • Selected Ion Flow Drift Tube
  • High Temperature Flowing Afterglow
  • Turbulent Ion Flow Tube
  • Flowing Afterglow Langmuir Probe

9
CRYRING SchematicUniversity of Stockholm, Manne
Siegbahn Laboratory
Swedish National Facility
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Raw Data for Rate Measurements
13
C2Hn Cross Section vs. Energy
Noise is from low signals and background
subtractions Many orders of magnitude No
resonances
All have similar Tn dependence C2H lt C2H3
C2H4 lt C3H7
14
Kinetics
  • k(300) (300/T)n Lehfaoui et. al.
  • n FALP ratio
  • C2H 2.70E-07 0.76
  • C2H2
  • C2H3 5.00E-07 0.84
  • C2H4 5.60E-07 0.76
  • C2H5 2.80E-07 0.81 6.0E-07 0.47
  • C3H7 1.90E-06 0.68 8.3E-06 2.2
  • C3D7 5.80E-07 0.73 8.3E-07 0.7
  • C4D9 5.80E-07 0.59 8.3E-07 0.7
  • Small differences between ions, T dependences
    within error
  • 30 systematic difference between CRYRING and
    FALP
  • C3H7 has unknown error

15
C2H3 Products Raw DataSmall Detector, Grid In
Background Signal
Background
Signal
16
C2H3 Products and ProbabilitiesTransmission
Probability T
  • C2H3 e Mass(Probability)
  • Note mass 1 is not used in determining
    branching ratios (detector noise)
  • ?C2H2 H 6.74 eV 27 26 1
  • T2 T(T-1) T(T-1)
  • ? C2H H2 5.59 eV 27 25 2
  • T2 T(T-1) T(T-1)
  • ? C2H 2H 1.07 eV 27 26 25 2 1
  • T3 2T2(1-T) T(1-T)2 T2(1-T) 2T(1-T)2
  • ? C2 H H2 0.4 eV 27 26 25 24 2 1
  • T3 T2(1-T) T2(1-T) T(1-T)2 T(1-T)2
    T(1-T)2
  • ? CH3 C 2.39 eV 27 15 12
  • T2 T(T-1) T(T-1)
  • ? CH2 CH 1.17 eV 27 14 13
  • T2 T(T-1) T(T-1)

17
C2H3 Product Matrix
T transmission probability N2C3H signal at
mass (energy) 27 amu Na branching at channel
a Solve matrix below to obtain branching ratios
 
Mass/Energy Probability
Matrix
BR
18
C2H3 Branching Ratios
  • C2H3 e ? C2H2 H 6.74 eV 29
  • ? C2H H2 5.59 eV 6
  • ? C2H H H 1.07 eV 59
  • ? C2 H H2 0.4 eV 3
  • ? CH3 C 2.39 eV 0.6
  • ? CH2 CH 1.17 eV 3

It is the large exothermicites that lead to
neutrals missing the detector since in that case
large perpendicular velocities are possible
19
Comparison to Models
 
Models
lt radicals producedgt 2.28
2.24
20
C2Hn Channel Comparison
21
C3H(D)7 Branching Ratios
H D C3H6 H 0.42 0.13 difference between H
and D is C3H5 H2 0.11 0.12 part
real part due to H loss C3H5 H H 0.22 C3H4
H2 H 0.09 0.09 C2H4 CH3 0.04 0.03 C2H4
CH2 H C2H3 CH4 0.19 0.02 C2H3 CH3
H 0.15 C2H2 CH4 H 0.11 0.03 C2H2 CH3
H2 0.21 Total C-C 0.35 (0.33 Astrid) 0.44 real
difference C3H3 H2 H2 lt0.05 0 C2H6
CH 0 C2H5 CH2 0





of radicals 1.68 (H) 1.74 (D) assumes 2H
vs. H2 etc.
22
Other Results
ASTRID
C4H9 e ? C3 C 0.38 0.41
C4
0.62 0.57 C2 0.015
C3H4 e ? C2 C 0.08 0.10
C3 0.87 0.90
23
Summary
  • Database for DR of organic ions is growing
  • Entire C2Hn series done, larger systems started
  • Rates have moderate agreement between FALP and
    CRYRING
  • Good agreement between ASTRID and CRYRING
    branching
  • CRYRING has H(D) resolution for larger systems
  • D effect in C3H7 branching
  • First four body channel for covalently bonded
    species
  • More radicals produced than originally believed
  • Larger effect in plasma enhanced combustion

24
Acknowledgement
  • Sue Arnold, Skip Williams, Tony Midey, Tom
    Miller AFRL
  • M. Larsson - University of Stockholm PI for this
    work
  • University of Stockholm Students and Postdocs
  • S. Kalhori R. Thomas V. Zhaunerchyk
  • S. Rosen A. Derkatch W. D. Geppert
  • A. Ehlerding F. Hellberg F. Österdahl
  • M. af. Ugglas CRYRING MS
  • J. Semaniak Swietokrzyska Academy, Kielce, Poland
  • Entire Staff at CRYRING
  • Funding AFOSR Molecular Dynamics (Berman)
    International Research Initiative (EOARD)

25
Future Work
  • Fast moving vehicles create plasmas mainly
    alkali ion emission
  • Plasmas interfere with radio frequency
    communications
  • Alkali ions are lost by three-body recombination
  • Na e M(e) ? Na (M)e
  • Little is known about this process
  • Alternative mechanism is
  • Na H2O M ?? Na(H2O) M
  • Na(H2O) e ? neutral products
  • Thermodynamics are known so study DR step
  • will probably be studied in the next year or
    so

26
Rates of Reactivity
  • Neutral-neutral reactions often immeasurably slow
  • Neutral-radical reactions 10-11 - 10-16 cm3 s-1
  • RadicalRadical reactions 10-10 - 10-13 cm3 s-1
  • Ion- molecule reactions gt 10-9 cm3 s-1
  • Ion-electron reactions gt 10-7 cm3 s-1
  • ? small concentrations
  • of plasma can have a large
  • influence on combustion

27
Interstellar Chemistry
  • Most molecules in interstellar clouds are formed
    by ion-molecule chemistry followed by DR (e A
    ? products)
  • Until recently, little was know about products of
    DR
  • Data base is growing due to storage rings
  • Early models included DR as only two body
    channels
  • - Before measurements
  • H3O e ? H2O H
  • - After measurements
  • H3O e ? H2O H (18)
  • ? OH H H (67)
  • ? OH H2 (11)
  • ? O H2 H (4)

28
Scramjet Test Facility WPAFB
Plasma Technology Breakthrough Enabling
Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion
WPAFB Scramjet Test Facility
Polytechnic University Plasma Ignitor
Our Role (1) Determine Mechanisms for
Plasma-Enhanced Combustion Ignition (2) Guide
Combustor Development
29
C6D6 Pettersson Andersson (U. of Gottenberg)
Larsson and van der Zande
Indicates ring breakup
30
C2H Branching Ratios
  • C2H e ? C2 H 6.53 eV, 45
  • ? CH C 3.89 eV, 38
  • ? C C H 0.35 17
  • Large difference in exothermicity but similar
    branching ratio for the 2 body channels
  • Average number of radicals is 2.17

31
Approach to UnderstandingPlasma Enhances
Combustion
  • Our part
  • Measure ion and e- chemistry
  • Simple models
  • At WPAFB
  • Better models
  • Test stands

32
Raw Data Small Detector, No Grid
Peak 850
Not on same scale
Background is from collisions with rest gas
(Plt10-11 Torr)
33
C2H4 Small Detector Grid In
Absent without grid
Peak with no grid
34
Raw Data Large Detector, No Grid
Not on same scale
Sit on this peak
No side peak
35
C2H4 Large Detector Grid In
Unresolved, shifted to lower mass/energy
Partially resolved
36
Scramjet Combustor Technology Development
AFRL/VS/PR Polytechnic Univ - Plasma Augmented
Scramjet Combustor
Spencer Kuo
Polytechnic Univ Plasma Ignitor
AFRL/PR Scramjet Test Facility
Mach 2 Test
  • Developed a plasma combustion model
  • Performed computations to guide ignitor and
    combustor design
  • Designed to ignite JP-7
  • Goals
  • Eliminate air throttle for ignition
  • Remove cavity
  • Enable aeroramp

37
Kinetics Run
Wait 4 s to cool by hn and e-
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com