Mansoura University Faculty of Applied Arts QAAP

1
Mansoura UniversityFaculty of Applied ArtsQAAP
2
Secretary ReviewerSpeakerMrs.Marwa Atroosh
3
Selection Criteria for Reviewers and Review
Secretaries

• All members of QAA teams will be selected by
  manger of the project .
• It will be invited to nominate reviewers .

4

• Faculty will encouraged to each nominate at least
  one candidate each to fill the role of review
  secretaries.

5

• Applications form will be the last step .
• Existing review secretaries will be eligible to
  apply using a streamlined process..

6

• Review secretaries will have responsibility for
• Access to adequate documentation during the
  review visit .
• Taking notes of the meetings held with staff and
  students

7

• Facilitating the team's identification and
  re-evaluation of the key themes to be pursued
  during the review
• Commenting on the compilation of the review
  report.

8
Induction and training of QAAP teams

• All members of QAAp teams, including those
  trained in other Agency methodologies, will be
  required to have undertaken induction and
  training in the QAAP approach and methodology.

9

• In addition to initial induction and training,
  all potential members of QAAP teams will be
  expected to participate in annual continuing
  development and information seminars.

10

• In general, all induction, training and
  continuing development/information events will
  involve reviewers including student reviewers)
  together with review secretaries.

11
Review secretaries Training

• Review secretaries and reviewers undergo a
  two-day training programme.
• Student reviewers will undergo a three-day
  training programme,

12

• There is a first day immediately preceding the
  two-day programme for other review team members
  in order that all members may then attend
  training together.

13

• The training will be designed and managed by the
  Faculty Unit.
• Training will include elements related to the
  philosophy and methodology of QAAP which will be
  delivered by the Faculty Unit.

14

• What secretaries required to be?
• Training must ensure that all secretaries
  Reviewer can
• Understand the aims and objectives of the QAAP
  process.
• ??Be fully familiar with the procedures involved

15

• ?? Understand the roles and tasks, the importance
  of team coherence, the education development
  expectations of them, and the rules of conduct
  governing the process

16

• ?? have an opportunity to explore and practice
  the techniques of data assimilation and analysis,
  
• the development of programmes for visits,

17

• the construction and testing of hypothesis,
• the formation of commentaries, conclusions and
  judgments and statements of confidence, and the
  preparation of reports.

18
Qualities required in all reviewers

• ??Understand a range of perspectives, to relate
  to arrange of individuals including students and
  member team

19

• and to hold discussions at a high level about
• strategic and operational approaches to the
  management of quality and
• standards in general and
• the enhancement of the student learning
  experience in particular
• ??

20

• Assimilate a large amount of disparate
  information to analyze and draw reliable
  conclusions about complex arrangements

21

• and to undertake research and investigation into
  documentary and oral information in order to
  arrive at discursive conclusions and to form
  evidence-based-
• commentaries,
• conclusions and
• judgments??

22

• Communicate clearly, orally and in writing
• ??Work productively and co-operatively in small
  teams delivering to tight deadlines
• ??Maintain the confidentiality of sensitive
  matters.

23
Qualities required in review secretaries

• They will be able to demonstrate
• ?? current experience in work with senior
  academic administration at institutional
  education
• wide experience of working with senior
  committees higher education

24
secretary reviewers must have the ability to

• ?? Assimilate a large amount of disparate
  information, and to analyze and make reliable
  judgments about complex arrangements
• keep a reliable record of discussions to
  summaries the key outcomes and to draft notes in
  a specified format to set deadlines
• ??

25

• ability to work productively and co-operatively
  in small teams delivering to tight deadlines
• ability to maintain the confidentiality of
  sensitive matters.

26

• Thank You
• Any Questions