Title: Pension Reform in the Slovak republic Experiences and Recomendations for Moldavian Government
1Pension Reform in the Slovak republicExperiences
and Recomendations for Moldavian Government
- Pension Reform Workshop
- Leogrand Hotel
- Chisinov, 10-11 June 2008
Marek L e n d a c k y Slovak Republic
2Slow reaction of social system to market economy
- Socialism era Social Security Act adopted in
1988 - So called Velvet Revolution in November 1989
- Financing of social security from state budget
- Transformation from planned to market economy
started in 1990 - Worsening of economic and demographic situation
- Splitting of Czech and Slovak republic in 1993
- First structural change in 1994 creation of
Social Insurance Agency - Introducing contributions as form of financing
social insurance benefits - Further structural changes followed
3...early steps in pension system not sufficient
- Introduction of supplementary pension insurance
companies (1996) - Exclusion of social assistance kind benefits from
pension system(1997) - Removing special early retirement provisions
(2000) - Contributions for working pensioners, limitation
of substitute periods, increasing contribution
rate (2001)
4Pension reform agenda
- The government will create conditions for
gradual establishment of a safe and fair pension
system, based on three pillars, which will be
universal for the entire economically active
population. The primary goal of the reform is to
halt further rise of the implicit debt of the
pay-as-you-go financed pension system and to
increase individual involvement in decisions on
personal well-being after retirement. - Programme Declaration of the Government of the
Slovak Republic, 2002
- although the wording of the reform plans were
considered very ambitious for a four-year time
horizon, the government managed to push through
all reform ideas - ...but some trade offs had to be taken...
5 The concept of the reform
- Step 1
- Social Insurance Act (2004)
- parametric reform of PAYG pension system
- Step 2
- Old-Age Pension Savings Act (2005)
- structural change mandatory, fully-funded
component of statutory pension system - Step 3
- Supplementary Pension Savings Act (2005)
- transformation of supplementary pension schemes
to standard pension funds
6Public perception of the reform
- The reform approach has found a positive public
feedback
7Architecture of the new system
Option 1
Option 2
Old age pension contributions
Old age pension contributions
Tier 1
Tier 1
Tier 2
Social Insurance Agency
Social Insurance Agency
Individual Account in PAMC
Old age pension
Old age pension
8Timetable of the PAYG reform
- June 2003
- Slovak government approved the new Social
Insurance Act - September 2003
- parliament passes the governments proposal
- October 2003
- President vetoes the Act
- parliament overrides the veto, confirms the new
legislation
9What has the reform left behind?
- high degree of leveling of pension rights
- high level of redistribution
- weak link between contributions paid and benefits
- low retirement age different treatment of men
and women - preferential treatment of certain groups (with
exception of military forces and some other
groups) - threat of massive and unsustainable deficits in
the pension system - low motivation to contribute to the system
10- high degree of leveling of pension rights
Old benefit formula Up to 2500 SKK 1/1 From
2500 to 6000 SKK 1/3 From 6000 to 10 000 SKK
1/10 Above 10 000 SKK...Zero! Assessment period
best 5 years
Old assessment base Min minimum wage Max 32
000 SKK (occasionally ad hoc increased from 1988
till 2003)
11- high level of redistribution
12- rapid nominal wage increase not linked to pension
rights
13New benefit formula P APWPLAPV APWP
average personal wage point L length of
carrier APV actual pension value (level of
replacement rate for average person)
New assessment base Min minimum wage Max 3
times average wage
14- low retirement age with different treatment of
men and women
15- preferential treatment of certain groups
- miners, pilots, special chemical industry, deep
divers, professional dancers - strong resistance and lobbing
- very long transitional period (till 2023)
- ...but effectively much more shorter...
- ...but some categories still persist military
forces, police, custom officers have special
social system
16Problematic issues in PAYG lessons learned
- publicly unacceptable disparities between low and
high earners (shift from unsustainable solidarity
to individual responsibility) - publicly unacceptable disparities between people
working after reaching the statutory retirement
age and retiring shortly before and after the
overhaul of PAYG system (January 1, 2004) - publicly unacceptable disparities between
widowers having lost their spouse before January
1, 2004 and widowers suffering after that date - Since the purely PAYG financed system covers all
current retirees, such disharmony was publicly
viewed as one of the major shortcomings of the
pension reform, prompting the government to step
in and polish the discrepancies
17Reforms impact on pension benefits
- new benefit formula strengthens the link between
contributions paid to the pension system and the
level of benefits via point system - effectively eliminates relatively generous
solidarity between low-earners and high-earners - fixes the individual replacement rate at about 50
transitional period originally set at 3 years...
UNACCEPTABLE! ...postponed to 11 years
too many low income earners below subsistence
minimum...UNACCEPTABLE! ...closer link to social
assistance scheme implemented
18Stronger link to social assistance scheme created
- Subsistence minimum 5130 SKK (for productive
person) - Special provision for pensioners 25 of their
pension not taken into account when calculating
social assistance benefit additional 1 for
each further year of insurance - Covering all types of pensions, but only for
old-age additional 1 benefit applied - Ministry of Labor responsible for sending
information on actual subsistence minimum level
to SIA - SIA responsible for information towards poor
pensioners (in productive age) or directly to
state offices providing social assistance
benefits (in post-productive age 62) - no automatic mechanism, no pension right,
mandatory claim - 31.12.2007 38 606 pensioners out of 1 244 392
19Stronger link to social assistance scheme created
20Preferential treatment of longer working life
- Assumptions
- two brothers (twins)
- first brother born Dec. 31, 1936
- second brother born Jan. 1, 1937
- completely identical working career, earning 1.85
times the nation-wide average monthly wage - period of pension insurance 38 years
- retiring 7 years after reaching the statutory
retirement age!!
- What pensions?
- Brother 1 9 219 SKK
- Brother 2 19 627 SKK
- Difference SKK 10 408 SKK
- The second brothers pension is more than twice
the pension of the first brother. - UNACCEPTABLE!
21Equal treatment of survivors
- Widowers pensions
- till December 31, 2003, widowers were not
entitled to almost any kind of survivors
pensions (only small fixed sum) - the new Social Insurance Act has established
their right to widowers pension, a move that set
a hardly accepted difference between men who lost
their wife before Jan 1, 2004 and after this date - RESULT
- new legislative initiative aimed at erasing this
disparities adopted in 2006
22Conclusions
- multi-pillar reform approach appears to be an
effective way to ensure the long-term
sustainability of the pension system and meeting
the pension promise, but in transitional period
flexible PAYG system changes are inevitable - fast implementation of the reform did not deliver
absolutely publicly acceptable results (e.g. few
extremely high pensions), urging the government
to accept measures to smoothen the transition
from one-pillar pension system to modern
multi-pillar system - special focus needed to create rescue wheel in
social assistance scheme when creating pure point
pension system
23Thank you for your attention!