Pension Reform in the Slovak republic Experiences and Recomendations for Moldavian Government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Pension Reform in the Slovak republic Experiences and Recomendations for Moldavian Government

Description:

Socialism era Social Security Act adopted in 1988 ... shortcomings of the pension reform, prompting the government to step in and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: AB286
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pension Reform in the Slovak republic Experiences and Recomendations for Moldavian Government


1
Pension Reform in the Slovak republicExperiences
and Recomendations for Moldavian Government
  • Pension Reform Workshop
  • Leogrand Hotel
  • Chisinov, 10-11 June 2008

Marek L e n d a c k y Slovak Republic
2
Slow reaction of social system to market economy
  • Socialism era Social Security Act adopted in
    1988
  • So called Velvet Revolution in November 1989
  • Financing of social security from state budget
  • Transformation from planned to market economy
    started in 1990
  • Worsening of economic and demographic situation
  • Splitting of Czech and Slovak republic in 1993
  • First structural change in 1994 creation of
    Social Insurance Agency
  • Introducing contributions as form of financing
    social insurance benefits
  • Further structural changes followed

3
...early steps in pension system not sufficient
  • Introduction of supplementary pension insurance
    companies (1996)
  • Exclusion of social assistance kind benefits from
    pension system(1997)
  • Removing special early retirement provisions
    (2000)
  • Contributions for working pensioners, limitation
    of substitute periods, increasing contribution
    rate (2001)


4
Pension reform agenda
  • The government will create conditions for
    gradual establishment of a safe and fair pension
    system, based on three pillars, which will be
    universal for the entire economically active
    population. The primary goal of the reform is to
    halt further rise of the implicit debt of the
    pay-as-you-go financed pension system and to
    increase individual involvement in decisions on
    personal well-being after retirement.
  • Programme Declaration of the Government of the
    Slovak Republic, 2002
  • although the wording of the reform plans were
    considered very ambitious for a four-year time
    horizon, the government managed to push through
    all reform ideas
  • ...but some trade offs had to be taken...

5
The concept of the reform
  • Step 1
  • Social Insurance Act (2004)
  • parametric reform of PAYG pension system
  • Step 2
  • Old-Age Pension Savings Act (2005)
  • structural change mandatory, fully-funded
    component of statutory pension system
  • Step 3
  • Supplementary Pension Savings Act (2005)
  • transformation of supplementary pension schemes
    to standard pension funds

6
Public perception of the reform
  • The reform approach has found a positive public
    feedback

7
Architecture of the new system
Option 1
Option 2
Old age pension contributions
Old age pension contributions
Tier 1
Tier 1
Tier 2
Social Insurance Agency
Social Insurance Agency
Individual Account in PAMC
Old age pension
Old age pension
8
Timetable of the PAYG reform
  • June 2003
  • Slovak government approved the new Social
    Insurance Act
  • September 2003
  • parliament passes the governments proposal
  • October 2003
  • President vetoes the Act
  • parliament overrides the veto, confirms the new
    legislation

9
What has the reform left behind?
  • high degree of leveling of pension rights
  • high level of redistribution
  • weak link between contributions paid and benefits
  • low retirement age different treatment of men
    and women
  • preferential treatment of certain groups (with
    exception of military forces and some other
    groups)
  • threat of massive and unsustainable deficits in
    the pension system
  • low motivation to contribute to the system

10
  • high degree of leveling of pension rights

Old benefit formula Up to 2500 SKK 1/1 From
2500 to 6000 SKK 1/3 From 6000 to 10 000 SKK
1/10 Above 10 000 SKK...Zero! Assessment period
best 5 years
Old assessment base Min minimum wage Max 32
000 SKK (occasionally ad hoc increased from 1988
till 2003)
11
  • high level of redistribution

12
  • rapid nominal wage increase not linked to pension
    rights

13
New benefit formula P APWPLAPV APWP
average personal wage point L length of
carrier APV actual pension value (level of
replacement rate for average person)
New assessment base Min minimum wage Max 3
times average wage
14
  • low retirement age with different treatment of
    men and women

15
  • preferential treatment of certain groups
  • miners, pilots, special chemical industry, deep
    divers, professional dancers
  • strong resistance and lobbing
  • very long transitional period (till 2023)
  • ...but effectively much more shorter...
  • ...but some categories still persist military
    forces, police, custom officers have special
    social system

16
Problematic issues in PAYG lessons learned
  • publicly unacceptable disparities between low and
    high earners (shift from unsustainable solidarity
    to individual responsibility)
  • publicly unacceptable disparities between people
    working after reaching the statutory retirement
    age and retiring shortly before and after the
    overhaul of PAYG system (January 1, 2004)
  • publicly unacceptable disparities between
    widowers having lost their spouse before January
    1, 2004 and widowers suffering after that date
  • Since the purely PAYG financed system covers all
    current retirees, such disharmony was publicly
    viewed as one of the major shortcomings of the
    pension reform, prompting the government to step
    in and polish the discrepancies

17
Reforms impact on pension benefits
  • new benefit formula strengthens the link between
    contributions paid to the pension system and the
    level of benefits via point system
  • effectively eliminates relatively generous
    solidarity between low-earners and high-earners
  • fixes the individual replacement rate at about 50

transitional period originally set at 3 years...
UNACCEPTABLE! ...postponed to 11 years
too many low income earners below subsistence
minimum...UNACCEPTABLE! ...closer link to social
assistance scheme implemented
18
Stronger link to social assistance scheme created
  • Subsistence minimum 5130 SKK (for productive
    person)
  • Special provision for pensioners 25 of their
    pension not taken into account when calculating
    social assistance benefit additional 1 for
    each further year of insurance
  • Covering all types of pensions, but only for
    old-age additional 1 benefit applied
  • Ministry of Labor responsible for sending
    information on actual subsistence minimum level
    to SIA
  • SIA responsible for information towards poor
    pensioners (in productive age) or directly to
    state offices providing social assistance
    benefits (in post-productive age 62)
  • no automatic mechanism, no pension right,
    mandatory claim
  • 31.12.2007 38 606 pensioners out of 1 244 392

19
Stronger link to social assistance scheme created
20
Preferential treatment of longer working life
  • Assumptions
  • two brothers (twins)
  • first brother born Dec. 31, 1936
  • second brother born Jan. 1, 1937
  • completely identical working career, earning 1.85
    times the nation-wide average monthly wage
  • period of pension insurance 38 years
  • retiring 7 years after reaching the statutory
    retirement age!!
  • What pensions?
  • Brother 1 9 219 SKK
  • Brother 2 19 627 SKK
  • Difference SKK 10 408 SKK
  • The second brothers pension is more than twice
    the pension of the first brother.
  • UNACCEPTABLE!

21
Equal treatment of survivors
  • Widowers pensions
  • till December 31, 2003, widowers were not
    entitled to almost any kind of survivors
    pensions (only small fixed sum)
  • the new Social Insurance Act has established
    their right to widowers pension, a move that set
    a hardly accepted difference between men who lost
    their wife before Jan 1, 2004 and after this date
  • RESULT
  • new legislative initiative aimed at erasing this
    disparities adopted in 2006

22
Conclusions
  • multi-pillar reform approach appears to be an
    effective way to ensure the long-term
    sustainability of the pension system and meeting
    the pension promise, but in transitional period
    flexible PAYG system changes are inevitable
  • fast implementation of the reform did not deliver
    absolutely publicly acceptable results (e.g. few
    extremely high pensions), urging the government
    to accept measures to smoothen the transition
    from one-pillar pension system to modern
    multi-pillar system
  • special focus needed to create rescue wheel in
    social assistance scheme when creating pure point
    pension system

23
Thank you for your attention!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com