Diapositive 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositive 1

Description:

STUDIES OF ELECTRON TRANSPORT AND CURRENT DIFFUSION. IN SWITCHED ECCD EXPERIMENTS ... en Physique des Plasmas, Association EURATOM Conf d ration Suisse, CRPP-EPFL, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: crpp1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositive 1


1
33rd EPS Conference on Plasma Physics and
Controlled Fusion, 19-23 June 2006, Rome, Italy
STUDIES OF ELECTRON TRANSPORT AND CURRENT
DIFFUSION IN SWITCHED ECCD EXPERIMENTS IN TCV
C. Zucca, S. Alberti, R. Behn, S. Cirant 1, E.
Fable, F. Gandini 1, T. P. Goodman, O.
Sauter   Centre de Recherches en Physique des
Plasmas, Association EURATOM Confédération
Suisse, CRPP-EPFL, Station 13, CH 1015,
Lausanne, Switzerland 1 Istituto di Fisica del
Plasma, EURATOM ENEA CNR Association, Milano,
Italy
  • Aims
  • To provide a better insight on the magnetic shear
    profile modification in Switched Electron
    Cyclotron Current Drive (SECCD) experiments 1.
  • To study the plasma response in the presence of
    SECCD in order to understand the differences in
    time scales and transient behaviour between the
    various models employed and under different
    experimental conditions such as modulation period
    and deposition location.

Numerical Results
  • Some parameters are fixed during all
    simulations k, d, PECH(r), ne(r), Ti(r), Ip.
  • IECCD and in certain cases Te are the only
    actuators for transport properties modifications.

Fixed experimental Te profile (co-phase)
  • Switched-ECCD experiments at TCV
  • Modulation of ECCD at constant total input
    power.
  • Target L-mode plasmas a 0.25 m, R0 0.8 m, ?
    1.6, Ip 150 kA, PECH 500 kW, ne0 1-2 1019
    m-3, B0 1.42 T.
  • HOW ARE SECCD EXPERIMENTS REALIZED?
  • During a discharge, co- and cnt-ECCD are
    alternatively injected inside the plasma at
    constant modulation frequency and same input
    power.
  • Symmetric aiming of the beams and constant power
    deposition profile PECH(r).
  • UNDERLYING MOTIVATION OF SECCD EXPERIMENTS
  • To decouple the contributions of heating from
    those of the current density tailoring.
  • This way, any modification in the transport
    properties of the plasma is to be ascribed only
    to the shear profile modulation realized by the
    ECCD switching.
  • For each SECCD discharge, a preliminary ECH shot
    is performed, with alternated on/off phases of
    the two beam clusters, to check that the total
    plasma energy stays constant and thus adjust
    PECH.

Varying experimental Te profile (alternated
co-/cnt-phases)
RLW model for ce
RLWs2 model for ce
Experimental Te data are averaged over each phase.
  • Color code co-SECCD in blue, cnt-SECCD in red.
  • Time traces of TCV shot 24867, see Ref. 1.
  • Modelling
  • To account for shear modulation, modelling of jp
    is necessary, there being no direct measurement
    available at TCV.
  • ASTRA 2 code for transport analysis coupled
    with CLQ3D Fokker-Planck quasi-linear code
    providing the ECCD profiles (required due to the
    effect of fast particle transport 3).
  • ASTRA employed in both predictive and
    interpretative mode, solving 1D flux-averaged
    diffusive equations for the Te and y
  • Equilibrium reconstruction by a 2D
    fixed-boundary Grad-Shafranov solver to calculate
    and update the flux surfaces at every time step
  • 3 different cases for electron energy transport
  • a) interpretative mode, providing measured
    Te(r, t) as input to ASTRA.
  • b) predictive mode, Rebut-Lallia-Watkins
    (RLW) semi-empirical local transport model 4

  • Critical value of ?Te is
    essentially negligible outside

  • the deposition region in case
    of ECH heated plasmas.
  • c) predictive mode, a modified RLW model with
    linear shear dependence (ce, RLW- ce, neo) s2.
  • Motivated by the fact that in the RLW
    model the reduction of transport is related to an
    increase on the local shear, ce ? 1/s,
    which is adequate for TCV discharges in case of
    negative or large positive shear.

Off-axis Shear modulation
Icd 17 kA Te Te (co)
Icd 10 kA Te Te (co)
Icd 10 kA RLW model
Icd 17 kA RLW model
  • MHD activity in newer discharges
  • A more recent series of SECCD discharges with
    double ECH power (i.e. 22 gyrotrons) and
    feedback control on the plasma elongation was
    realized to create a large database featuring
    different values of the plasma current, radial
    location and width of the deposited power.
  • Unfortunately these discharges exhibit constant
    MHD activity, which complicates the correct
    interpretation of the observed electron
    temperature modulation.
  • The mode activity is very intense during all
    co-SECCD phases and fades out when switching to
    cnt-SECCD, revealing that the q profile is indeed
    modified locally.
  • This also explains why in these new discharges
    no significant effect on Te is observed.
  • Nevertheless, the identification of the toroidal
    and poloidal mode numbers for these modes should
    allow a possible validation of the ASTRA
    modelling by comparison with the simulated
    rational q surfaces.
  • Such work could also be used to aid in avoiding
    MHD modes and thus in designing future SECCD
    experiments.

co cnt
f Hz
t s
  • Conclusions
  • Similar shear variation as obtained with a
    previous modelling based on electrodynamics
    calculations 1.
  • Location and extent of the shear modulation is
    essentially independent of the transport model
    employed, confirming the robustness of the shear
    modelling (main contribution from jECCD).
  • Experimental Te shows that Te(co) gt Te(cnt),
    consistent with decrease of confinement
    properties if the shear increases in the radial
    region where s lt 1, as predicted by gyrokinetic
    simulations 5.
  • With a reasonable IECCD 10 kA at rdep 0.5, s
    spans from 1.4 to 1.65 ? possible to
    experimentally investigate the predicted inverse
    behaviour of transport properties at s gt 1-1.5.
  • The SECCD experiments should be complemented by
    a comparison with steady-state conditions to
    provide more information about the link between
    electron transport and magnetic shear.

References 1 S. Cirant et al., Nucl. Fusion
46, 500-511 (2006) 2 G.V. Pereverzev et al.,
Max Planck IPP Report, IPP 5/42 (1991) 3 P.
Nikkola et al., Nucl. Fusion 43, 1343-1352
(2003) 4 P. H. Rebut et al., Proc. 12th Int.
Conf. On Plasma Phys. And Controlled Nucl. Fus.
Research, Nice 1988, IAEA VIENNA 1989, Vol. 2, p.
191 5 A. Bottino et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
Fusion 48, 215-233 (2006) This work was partly
supported by the Swiss National Science
Foundation. Email costanza.zucca_at_epfl.ch
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com