The New National Performance Development Review PDR Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

The New National Performance Development Review PDR Process

Description:

Constable. 4 yrs service. 2 staff on. job share. Support staff. 7 ... Constable. back from. SPC last year. Service Centre. What would you take. into account... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: tulliall
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The New National Performance Development Review PDR Process


1
The New National Performance Development Review
(PDR) Process
ACPOS People Strategy
2
INTRODUCTION
3
Timetable
  • Introduction
  • Knowledge Check
  • Performance Management Overview
  • Objectives
  • Break
  • Behaviours
  • Evidence Gathering
  • Lunch
  • Personal Learning Development Plan
  • PDR Discussion
  • Quality Checking
  • Break
  • PDR System Demo
  • Summary/Close

4
Aims
  • To provide the knowledge and skills to
    effectively manage the performance and
    development of your staff
  • To enhance your staffs' contribution and assist
    them to achieve their potential.

5
Learning OutcomesAt the end of the training,
you will be able to
  • Understand how individual performance impacts on
    team and Force performance
  • Discuss and agree objectives with your staff
  • Gather and assess evidence for your staff
  • Review achievement of objectives and assess
    behaviours

6
Learning Outcomes(cont)
  • Identify and address development needs
  • Complete a Performance and Development Review
  • Carry out effective performance review
    discussions with your staff

7
KNOWLEDGE CHECK
Complete the knowledge check/quiz, based on what
you have learned from the Video/CBT (Computer
Based Training) package
8
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENTOVERVIEW
9
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Inputs
Objectives for forthcoming period
Personal Learning Development Plan (PLDP)
10
What should be assessed in a Performance and
Development Review (PDR) ?
  • Personality ?
  • Achievements ?
  • Attitude ?
  • Knowledge ?
  • Competence in current job ?
  • Skills ?
  • Behaviours ?
  • Performance in current job ?
  • Ambition ?

11
PDR ROLES
Senior Manager (Managers Supervisor)
These are generic roles, independent of rank or
grade
Manager (Reviewers Supervisor)
Reviewer (First Line Supervisor)
Reviewee (Person whose performance is being
reviewed)
12
OBJECTIVES
13
Setting Objectives
  • Focus on Platform for Success
  • Aim is that everyone knows how they contribute to
    the overall Force objectives
  • 3-5 objectives recommended

14
Setting Objectives
  • Objectives can either be
  • - Role specific
  • Developmental
  • SMART objectives
  • Quantitative (targets)
  • Qualitative (standards)

15
How to make them SMART
  • SPECIFIC be clear about what you want to
    achieve, define the result or outcome.
  • MEASURABLE by a quantifiable or qualitative
  • performance measure e.g. how many?, to what
    standard?,
  • by when?, how often?, saving, increase
    in... decrease in...,
  • of...number achieved/processed, number of
    complaints. Also
  • be clear how/where the measure is captured
    could be
  • in a staff survey, a database, etc.
  • ACHIEVABLE consider the individual, their
    experience,
  • what should be expected of them? Consider
    also any constraints
  • or external influences.
  • RELEVANT - to their current role and should be
    easily linked
  • to local department / Force goals. Shared
    objectives may be relevant
  • to team situations but try to personalise
    them.
  • TIME LIMITED this can relate to an actual
    completion
  • date or cover the entire review period.

16
Exercise
  • You will be given a sheet giving examples of what
    we have now (these are real examples taken from
    recent appraisal reports)
  • In groups, discuss whether they are SMART and
    re-draft them where necessary
  • Work in 3s (15 mins)

17
Exercise
  • Choose one of the following Supervisory roles
    and
  • consider what you would take
  • into account when setting and
  • agreeing objectives for individuals
  • in your team
  • set one objective for each team
  • member
  • Work individually (5mins) then discuss in groups
    (10mins)

18
Support Staff Supervisor
Support staff 20 yrs service
Constable 4 yrs service
What would you take into account...?
2 staff on job share
Support staff 7 yrs service
Service Centre
Operational Policing
Sergeant
2 Constables 10 yrs service
Support staff 15 yrs service
Set one objective for each team member
Constable back from SPC last year
Part-time worker 3 days/wk
19
Assessing Objectives
  • Consider objectives
  • SMART easily measured
  • Consider circumstances outwith control

20
Behaviours
21
Behaviours
22
Behaviour mapping PDR ---gt PABS
23
Behaviours
  • 11 Behaviours
  • Between 8 and 11 Behaviours allocated depending
    on role and supervisory responsibility three
    predefined levels Essential, Supervisory and
    Managerial
  • Allocation is not prescriptive e.g. Partnership
    Working, it can be added to the PDR record by the
    Reviewer.

24
Allocation of Behaviours
25
Assessing Behaviours
Title and Descriptor
Buttons show Exceeding (E) Competent (C)
Development (D) Indicators
Add Evidence of performance here
26
Effective Communication Indicator Examples
  • Indicators
  • Examples of behaviour at three performance
    levels.
  • Exceeding (E)
  • Competent (C)
  • Development (D)

27
Buttons show Exceeding (E), Competent (C)
Development (D) Indicators
Assessing Behaviours
Title and Descriptor
D
C
E
Add Evidence of performance here
  • You will need to
  • Assess each behaviour against the descriptor
  • Consider relevant evidence
  • Review behaviour indicators to help decide on the
    appropriate rating
  • Allocate a rating for each behaviour. Evidence
    must be added where the rating is HIGHER or LOWER
    than competent

28

Exercise
Review the behaviour examples. Give a rating
for each one and indicate the evidence used for
this rating
Work individually (15 mins)
29
EVIDENCE GATHERING
30
Evidence Gathering
  • What is Evidence?
  • Evidence ...proof...verification...testimony...su
    bstantiation
  • A comment about someones performance
  • An objective achieved
  • An observation of behaviour
  • Comment on someones performance
  • - dealing with an incident
  • - delivering a piece of work
  • Either positive or negative
  • Should be verified/substantiated

31
Evidence Gathering
  • EVERYONE can gather evidence of their own
    performance
  • POLICE OFFICERS can add evidence for any lower
    ranked officer
  • SUPPORT STAFF - the immediate supervisor
    /managers can record evidence relative to their
    staff
  • Anyone can report evidence to the reviewees line
    manager
  • Individuals have the opportunity to acknowledge
    evidence received
  • Use behaviour descriptors/indicators as a guide

32
OVERALL SUMMARY RATING
33
OVERALL SUMMARY
Achievement of Objectives Assessment of
Behaviours PERFORMANCE REVIEW


34
OVERALL SUMMARY
Achievement of objectives
Assessment of behaviours
Sections 5 and 6 should balance the achievement
of objectives and the assessment of behaviours
35
What should the summary include ?
  • Achievement of objectives
  • Assessment of behaviours
  • Something that personalises the performance
  • Conclude with a positive comment

36
OVERALL RATING
A competent rating is achieving objectives AND
displaying behaviours at competent level
What if someone achieved all their objectives
but upset all their staff on the way?
What if someone displayed competent behaviour
but actually did not achieve any objectives?
37
Avoiding bias or discrimination
  • Stereotyping
  • Perception
  • Comparisons
  • Halo or horns
  • Similar to us

The more conscious we are of our own biases,
the more likely we will be able to form an
objective and balanced view of others
38
Exercise
  • Review the Overall Summary examples
  • Mark as ? or x to indicate whether you consider
    them to be good or poor summaries. Give reasons.
  • Work in pairs (10 minutes)

39
PERSONAL LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
40
PLDP Identifying needs
YOUR ROLE
  • Help staff to see it as a chance to improve
    rather than a criticism
  • Guard against it becoming a wish-list
  • Actively think of (different) ways to meet the
    needs
  • Your Manager will prioritise and authorise (to a
    training waiting list)

41
Exercise
  • Choose a behaviour consider the development
    indicator examples
  • List different ways of meeting the development
    need

42
PLDP Meeting needs
43
Taking control....self development
  • Strive to improve current performance
  • Seek out opportunities for learning
  • Assess own needs
  • Assess own progress
  • Experiment, try new or different things
  • Learn from chance situations
  • Reach conclusions about experiences
  • Implement what has been learned

44
PDR DISCUSSION
45
PDR Discussion
PURPOSE
  • Clarifying and agreeing objectives
  • Monitoring performance
  • Assessing performance
  • Giving feedback
  • Identifying development needs

46
PDR Discussion key features
  • Genuine 2-way discussion
  • Unhindered by rank or grade
  • Upbeat and forward looking
  • Constructive, not destructive
  • Good questioning
  • Active listening

47
PDR Discussion key features
  • Honest
  • Specific
  • Acknowledge extra effort
  • Regular best practise
  • Always finish on a positive

48
Feedback skills
... some facts ...
  • Basic need for feedback
  • Essential for good performance
  • Positive feedback more beneficial effect than
    negative
  • If given regularly and constructively, staff
    accept necessary negative feedback more readily

49
Feedback skills
This is an area where we all have development
needs
50
FEEDBACK
  • Be genuine
  • Be specific
  • Acknowledge extra effort
  • Give immediately

51
Exercise
  • Practise giving and receiving
  • feedback (use situations from
  • scenario cards)
  • Work in 3s one giving feedback, one receiving
  • feedback and one observing

52
QUALITY CHECKING AND SIGN OFF
53
QUALITY CHECKLIST
  • Is the PDR balanced and effectively completed
  • Are the behaviour ratings balanced and
    appropriate evidence given?
  • Is there any over use of the competent rating?
  • Do the summary of overall performance (Section 5)
    and the overall rating (Section 6) reflect both
    objectives and behaviours?

54
QUALITY CHECKLIST
  • Are the work objectives (Section 7) SMART and
    clearly linked to the overall Force objectives?
  • Have development needs been reflected in the PLDP
    (Section 8)
  • Is the PDR balanced and consistent with others in
    the team /across other supervisors ?
  • Does the PDR indicate any outstanding
    issues or need further discussion?

55
Exercise
  • Review these completed PDRs and check them for
    quality
  • Would you sign off these PDRs ?
  • Work in 3s (15 mins)

56
PDR SYSTEM DEMO
57
PDR IN GRAMPIAN
58
The Pilot
  • ACPOS sponsored Project
  • Pilot on behalf of all Scottish Forces
  • Evaluation

59
The PilotFirst year of operation
  • Objectives taken from either
  • Role Requirement
  • PDP
  • Job description
  • Objectives derived from
  • Platform for Success
  • Behaviours similar to those in PABS
  • Minimal evidence gathered
  • Both appraisal formats (PABS and PDR) will be
    accepted for future selection processes or
    promotion boards

60
The Pilot Special arrangements
  • Special arrangements are required for
  • Staff who do not have access to a computer
  • Staff who are seconded out of Force

61
CONCLUSIONS
62
Learning OutcomesAt the end of the training,
are you able to
  • Understand how individual performance impacts on
    team and Force performance
  • Discuss and agree objectives with your staff
  • Gather and assess evidence for your staff
  • Review achievement of objectives and assess
    behaviours

63
Learning Outcomes(cont)
  • Identify and address development needs
  • Complete a Performance and Development Review
  • Carry out effective performance review
    discussions with your staff

64
SUPPORT
  • Force Intranet site with link to Project Team
  • Guidance notes
  • Q/As
  • Helpline to local support and to project team at
    SPC
  • E-mail to a PDR focal point, reply within 2
    working days
  • Request for assistance 1-1 coaching
  • Range of videos, CD-ROMs and books that can be
    borrowed

65
COURSE EVALUATION
66
Timetable
  • Introduction
  • Knowledge Check
  • Performance Management Overview
  • Objectives
  • Break
  • Behaviours
  • Evidence Gathering
  • Lunch
  • Personal Learning Development Plan
  • PDR Discussion
  • Quality Checking
  • Break
  • PDR System Demo
  • Summary/Close
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com