Title: Private Military Companies: Accountability Under International Law
1Private Military Companies Accountability Under
International Law
War is far too important to be left to the
generals it is also far too important to be
left to the C.E.O.s. -P.W. Singer
2History of Military Privatization
1294b.c. Ramses II Battle for Kadesh
334b.c. Alexander the Great Persian Invasion
Medieval Era Basil II Varangian Guard
1400s Swiss Mercenaries France, Spain, Italy
1775-1783 British American War for Indepenence
270b.c. Siracusa Kings Mamertimes
1066 William the Conquerer Norman Conquest
Renaissance Italian City-States Condottieri
1000b.c. King David Israel
3Modern Privatization
- 1916-1928 Chinese Warlord Period
- 1941 Roosevelts Flying Tigers
- 1960-1965 Congo
- 1967-1970 Nigeria Biafra
- 1970s Angola (FNLA v. MLPA)
- JohnBanks
- 1990s Angola (MLPA v. UNITA)
- Executives Outcomes
- 1990s Sierra Leone
- Gurkha Security Guards
- Executive Outcomes
- 1990s Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Executive Outcomes
- 1990s-2009 Iraq
- Blackwater
- 2000s Democratic Republic of Congo
- Omega Security Solutions
- AQMI Strategy Corp.
- 2000s Israel
4Mercenaries under International Law
- Hague Conventions
- Geneva Conventions
- UN Charter Resolutions
- Additional Protocol I
- Organization of African Union Resolutions
- OAU Convention against Mercenaries
- UN Mercenary Convention
5Hague Conventions (Hague V) - 1907
- With a view to laying down more clearly the
rights and duties of neutral Powers in case of
war on land and regulating the position of the
belligerents Preamble
- Distinction between allowing recruitment
voluntarily joining - Article 4 state may not allow formation nor
recruitment - Article 6 no duty on state to prevent
individuals traversing borders (limits the
obligation) - ? States must prevent domestic mercenary
recruitment but not required to outlaw per se
6Geneva Convention III - 1949
- Art. 4 specifically does not mention PMCs in
extending POW status - Debate ?
- Commentary on Geneva Conventions silence
amounts to lack of consideration of PMCs - Modern Scholars purposeful exclusion
- ? States required to hold PMCs accountable for
grave breaches but no criminalization
7UN Charter Resolutions
- Charter limits use of force
- exceptions individual or collective
self-defense in the face of an armed attack - UNGA Res. 2131 (1965) forceful defense of
sovereignty but no mention of mercenaries - may be construed to apply to PMCs and prevent
unlawful intevention (beginnings of intervention
law) - unaminously adopted by 109 member states
- UNGA Res. 2465 (1968) criminalizes and outlaws
mercenaries, non-binding aspiration of customary
interl law condemns state toleration - only applies to post-colonial wars of natl
liberation - 53-8-43
8UN Charter Resolutions
- UNGA Res. 2625 (1970) proscribes only State
sponsorship not prevent from recruiting no
mention of natl liberation movements - providing contractors for non-state actors wholly
acceptable - UNGA Res. 3103 (1973) reinforces natl
liberation movements reaffirms domestic
punishment as criminals but without state
practice remains outside customary interl law - client of a racist regime that suppressed
self-determination movement then go against 3103 - 83-13-19
- UNGA Res. 3314 (1974) all State use of
mercenaries for unjust force violates UN Charter
context irrelevant individuals not mentioned - adoption by consensus customary interl law
- 1987 establishment of Special Rapporteur
9UN Charter Resolutions
- UNGA Res. 151 (2007) reiterated past
resolutions and reaffirmed the work of the
Working Group (est. 2005) who works with govts,
IGO/NGOs and PMCs to - - draft Model Law
- identify elements for a draft convention on PMCs
- elaborate on existing legal gaps
- monitor mercenary-like activities worldwide
10UN Charter Resolutions
- ? States must not organize, encourage or send
mercenaries in acts of armed force against
another State context irrelevant - ? States may tolerate mercenary use of force
against another State - ? Working Group OHCHR tasked with examining
trends proposing accountability mechanisms
11Protocol I - 1977
- Working Group Committee III political
compromise - discourage but not regulate
mercenaries (Nigerian proponents) - Developed whatever their faults and their moral
destitution they should have these fundamental
guarantees - Holy See, US
- Developing odious profession of paid killers
- Nigeria, Libra, Zaire, Cuba, Syria, Soviet Union
- focus from 1950-1977 - 3000 years of history
ignored
12Protocol I - 1977
- Art. 47 DOES
- defines mercenary
- characterizes as unlawful combatants (remains
outside customary interl law) - denies fundamental freedoms of Art. 75 no POW
status - encourage domestic regulation criminalizing
mercenaries - establish motivation and compensation criteria
- Art. 47 DOES NOT
- examine the status of mercenaries
- criminalize mercenarism or recruitment of
- prevent States from incorporating mercenaries
into armed forces bypassing application of Art.
47
13Organization of African Unity
- 1967 Resolution Regulating Mercenaries
- condemnation and encouraged domestic measures
- 1971 Declaration on the Activities of
Mercenaries - mobilize global opinion towards eradication of
mercenaries - end colonialism in Africa which allows
mercenaries to prosper - 1972/1976 Draft Convention for the Elimination
of Mercenaries in Africa - defined mercenary without motivation
- identified individual and State responsibilties
- criminalized recruitment and mercenarism
14International Convention Against the Recruitment,
Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries (OAU)
- 1977
- Status unlawful combatants not POWs
- Definition nearly identical to Protocol I
- Criminalizes mercenarism related offenses
- disparity between definition of mercenary crime
of mercenarism - ex Former Legionnaire no recruitment, fights
for profit in non-post-colonial situation - assists rebels but not to overthrow/destabilize
govt - contract with MOD??
15UN Mercenary Convention 1989
- Definition broader than OAU Protocol I
- lowers threshold requirements for being a
mercenary - lower compensation threshold (comparison to
native counterparts) - massive evidentiary problems in terms of
prosecution - maintains motivational component
- volunteer fighting for ideology that is racist or
favors alien domination not mercenary
16UN Mercenary Convention 1989
- Criminal Liability mercenary who directly
participates, accomplice, attempts or anyone
recruits, finances, uses or trains - States criminally liable?
- State Obligations affirmative duties
- generally prohibit mercenary activities
- specifically prevent if intended to oppose
self-determination movement - Something more than just domestic legislation?
17UN Mercenary Convention 1989
- ? Entry into force 2001 with 22 States
- ? 32 ratifications to date
- most recently Syria in autumn 2008
- ? 6 original OAU states to urge sign
- Cameroon only one to become a party
- Angola DRC used mercenaries since
- ? Nigeria (proposed Art. 47 UN Convention) not
a state party
18Are Private Military Contractors Mercenaries?
19Applying Conventional Mercenary Instruments to
PMCS
- Art. 47 Protocol I - generally not meet
requirements - recruited for armed conflict
- logistic services, protective detail
- Executive Outcomes not likely to be repeated
- direct participation
- offensive/defensive is participating but probably
more than self-defense or defense of third
persons - citizen of state not party to conflict
- not always the case particularly in Iraq
- motivation
- ie prosecutor would have to compare to motive
for those in regular army which is not just
health benefits ideology
20Applying Conventional Mercenary Instruments to
PMCS
- UN Mercenary Convention irrelevant and freely
ignored - motivation
- contracting solely for financial gain
- particular recruitment
- Not recruited for concerted act of violence to
overthrow or undermine a state
21Is Absolute Prohibition Possible?
- contradicts 3000 years of history
- lacks political will
- wholly unenforceable
- without global prohibition creates further
problems
22Holding PMCs Accountable International
Options
- State Sanctions through interl community
- legal sanctions against employing State
- waiver of objection to extradition to universal
jurisdiction State - legal recourse to ICC or ad hoc tribunal
- UN Rapporteur/Working Group expand mandate
- universal proposed domestic legislation
- universal licensing scheme where the UN then
hires companies
23Holding PMCs Accountable Domestic
Options
- Litigation
- Corporation - go after parent corporation based
on negligence - corporations duty to care v. crime committed
- Individual military or civilian courts
- detecting violations
- jurisdictional issues
- evidentiary mountains to climb
- political question doctrine
- government contractor immunity
- liability superior responsibility, JCE,
complicity of CEOs
24Holding PMCs Accountable Domestic
Options
- Contracual Method forces the client to monitor
and ensure compliance would this wipe out any
efficiency gained through PMCs? - corporate structure duty to care
- incorporate domestic laws into contracts
- enforcement mechanisms judicial review?
- reporting requirements
- Institutional Change cultural, organizational,
professional norms industry wide - licensing schemes that are not self-imposed
- sanctioning for non-compliance
- codes of conduct (force adoption of IPOA code)
self-regulation - external independent monitor (ex ABA, AMA)
25Montreaux Document 2008
- 28 States support limited to armed conflict
many do not apply those provisions already in
place - ? Applicable Legal Obligations
- State obligations remain and must apply IHL HRL
(Hague, Geneva, Protocol I, UN Convtn) - PMCs must respect natl laws, IHL, HRL
- notes superior liability of govt over PMCs
- ? Best Practices
- establishes criteria, procedure, terms of
contracts - creation of monitoring authorizing mechanisms
26A target at the end of the scope.
- Definition (individuals acts) perform
mercenary-like activities but fall outside the
definition - profit motive irrelevant
- nationality residencey irrelevant
- accountability based definition
- Political Will lack of it to limit
mercenary-like activities - strong weak states acknowledge benefits of PMCs
efforts to reduce are shams - Interl Law interl community advocates against
mercenaries yet since Cold War practice has
increased - Can Working Group overcome the UN beauracracy in
a reasonable timeframe?