Private Military Companies: Accountability Under International Law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Private Military Companies: Accountability Under International Law

Description:

War is far too important to be left to the generals... ex: Former Legionnaire no recruitment, fights for profit in non-post-colonial situation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:487
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: margaretz
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Private Military Companies: Accountability Under International Law


1
Private Military Companies Accountability Under
International Law
  • Margaret Zimmerman
  • ISISC

War is far too important to be left to the
generals it is also far too important to be
left to the C.E.O.s. -P.W. Singer
2
History of Military Privatization
1294b.c. Ramses II Battle for Kadesh
334b.c. Alexander the Great Persian Invasion
Medieval Era Basil II Varangian Guard
1400s Swiss Mercenaries France, Spain, Italy
1775-1783 British American War for Indepenence
270b.c. Siracusa Kings Mamertimes
1066 William the Conquerer Norman Conquest
Renaissance Italian City-States Condottieri
1000b.c. King David Israel
3
Modern Privatization
  • 1916-1928 Chinese Warlord Period
  • 1941 Roosevelts Flying Tigers
  • 1960-1965 Congo
  • 1967-1970 Nigeria Biafra
  • 1970s Angola (FNLA v. MLPA)
  • JohnBanks
  • 1990s Angola (MLPA v. UNITA)
  • Executives Outcomes
  • 1990s Sierra Leone
  • Gurkha Security Guards
  • Executive Outcomes
  • 1990s Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Executive Outcomes
  • 1990s-2009 Iraq
  • Blackwater
  • 2000s Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Omega Security Solutions
  • AQMI Strategy Corp.
  • 2000s Israel

4
Mercenaries under International Law
  • Hague Conventions
  • Geneva Conventions
  • UN Charter Resolutions
  • Additional Protocol I
  • Organization of African Union Resolutions
  • OAU Convention against Mercenaries
  • UN Mercenary Convention

5
Hague Conventions (Hague V) - 1907
  • With a view to laying down more clearly the
    rights and duties of neutral Powers in case of
    war on land and regulating the position of the
    belligerents Preamble
  • Distinction between allowing recruitment
    voluntarily joining
  • Article 4 state may not allow formation nor
    recruitment
  • Article 6 no duty on state to prevent
    individuals traversing borders (limits the
    obligation)
  • ? States must prevent domestic mercenary
    recruitment but not required to outlaw per se

6
Geneva Convention III - 1949
  • Art. 4 specifically does not mention PMCs in
    extending POW status
  • Debate ?
  • Commentary on Geneva Conventions silence
    amounts to lack of consideration of PMCs
  • Modern Scholars purposeful exclusion
  • ? States required to hold PMCs accountable for
    grave breaches but no criminalization

7
UN Charter Resolutions
  • Charter limits use of force
  • exceptions individual or collective
    self-defense in the face of an armed attack
  • UNGA Res. 2131 (1965) forceful defense of
    sovereignty but no mention of mercenaries
  • may be construed to apply to PMCs and prevent
    unlawful intevention (beginnings of intervention
    law)
  • unaminously adopted by 109 member states
  • UNGA Res. 2465 (1968) criminalizes and outlaws
    mercenaries, non-binding aspiration of customary
    interl law condemns state toleration
  • only applies to post-colonial wars of natl
    liberation
  • 53-8-43

8
UN Charter Resolutions
  • UNGA Res. 2625 (1970) proscribes only State
    sponsorship not prevent from recruiting no
    mention of natl liberation movements
  • providing contractors for non-state actors wholly
    acceptable
  • UNGA Res. 3103 (1973) reinforces natl
    liberation movements reaffirms domestic
    punishment as criminals but without state
    practice remains outside customary interl law
  • client of a racist regime that suppressed
    self-determination movement then go against 3103
  • 83-13-19
  • UNGA Res. 3314 (1974) all State use of
    mercenaries for unjust force violates UN Charter
    context irrelevant individuals not mentioned
  • adoption by consensus customary interl law
  • 1987 establishment of Special Rapporteur

9
UN Charter Resolutions
  • UNGA Res. 151 (2007) reiterated past
    resolutions and reaffirmed the work of the
    Working Group (est. 2005) who works with govts,
    IGO/NGOs and PMCs to -
  • draft Model Law
  • identify elements for a draft convention on PMCs
  • elaborate on existing legal gaps
  • monitor mercenary-like activities worldwide

10
UN Charter Resolutions
  • ? States must not organize, encourage or send
    mercenaries in acts of armed force against
    another State context irrelevant
  • ? States may tolerate mercenary use of force
    against another State
  • ? Working Group OHCHR tasked with examining
    trends proposing accountability mechanisms

11
Protocol I - 1977
  • Working Group Committee III political
    compromise - discourage but not regulate
    mercenaries (Nigerian proponents)
  • Developed whatever their faults and their moral
    destitution they should have these fundamental
    guarantees
  • Holy See, US
  • Developing odious profession of paid killers
  • Nigeria, Libra, Zaire, Cuba, Syria, Soviet Union
  • focus from 1950-1977 - 3000 years of history
    ignored

12
Protocol I - 1977
  • Art. 47 DOES
  • defines mercenary
  • characterizes as unlawful combatants (remains
    outside customary interl law)
  • denies fundamental freedoms of Art. 75 no POW
    status
  • encourage domestic regulation criminalizing
    mercenaries
  • establish motivation and compensation criteria
  • Art. 47 DOES NOT
  • examine the status of mercenaries
  • criminalize mercenarism or recruitment of
  • prevent States from incorporating mercenaries
    into armed forces bypassing application of Art.
    47

13
Organization of African Unity
  • 1967 Resolution Regulating Mercenaries
  • condemnation and encouraged domestic measures
  • 1971 Declaration on the Activities of
    Mercenaries
  • mobilize global opinion towards eradication of
    mercenaries
  • end colonialism in Africa which allows
    mercenaries to prosper
  • 1972/1976 Draft Convention for the Elimination
    of Mercenaries in Africa
  • defined mercenary without motivation
  • identified individual and State responsibilties
  • criminalized recruitment and mercenarism

14
International Convention Against the Recruitment,
Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries (OAU)
- 1977
  • Status unlawful combatants not POWs
  • Definition nearly identical to Protocol I
  • Criminalizes mercenarism related offenses
  • disparity between definition of mercenary crime
    of mercenarism
  • ex Former Legionnaire no recruitment, fights
    for profit in non-post-colonial situation
  • assists rebels but not to overthrow/destabilize
    govt
  • contract with MOD??

15
UN Mercenary Convention 1989
  • Definition broader than OAU Protocol I
  • lowers threshold requirements for being a
    mercenary
  • lower compensation threshold (comparison to
    native counterparts)
  • massive evidentiary problems in terms of
    prosecution
  • maintains motivational component
  • volunteer fighting for ideology that is racist or
    favors alien domination not mercenary

16
UN Mercenary Convention 1989
  • Criminal Liability mercenary who directly
    participates, accomplice, attempts or anyone
    recruits, finances, uses or trains
  • States criminally liable?
  • State Obligations affirmative duties
  • generally prohibit mercenary activities
  • specifically prevent if intended to oppose
    self-determination movement
  • Something more than just domestic legislation?

17
UN Mercenary Convention 1989
  • ? Entry into force 2001 with 22 States
  • ? 32 ratifications to date
  • most recently Syria in autumn 2008
  • ? 6 original OAU states to urge sign
  • Cameroon only one to become a party
  • Angola DRC used mercenaries since
  • ? Nigeria (proposed Art. 47 UN Convention) not
    a state party

18
Are Private Military Contractors Mercenaries?
19
Applying Conventional Mercenary Instruments to
PMCS
  • Art. 47 Protocol I - generally not meet
    requirements
  • recruited for armed conflict
  • logistic services, protective detail
  • Executive Outcomes not likely to be repeated
  • direct participation
  • offensive/defensive is participating but probably
    more than self-defense or defense of third
    persons
  • citizen of state not party to conflict
  • not always the case particularly in Iraq
  • motivation
  • ie prosecutor would have to compare to motive
    for those in regular army which is not just
    health benefits ideology

20
Applying Conventional Mercenary Instruments to
PMCS
  • UN Mercenary Convention irrelevant and freely
    ignored
  • motivation
  • contracting solely for financial gain
  • particular recruitment
  • Not recruited for concerted act of violence to
    overthrow or undermine a state

21
Is Absolute Prohibition Possible?
  • contradicts 3000 years of history
  • lacks political will
  • wholly unenforceable
  • without global prohibition creates further
    problems

22
Holding PMCs Accountable International
Options
  • State Sanctions through interl community
  • legal sanctions against employing State
  • waiver of objection to extradition to universal
    jurisdiction State
  • legal recourse to ICC or ad hoc tribunal
  • UN Rapporteur/Working Group expand mandate
  • universal proposed domestic legislation
  • universal licensing scheme where the UN then
    hires companies

23
Holding PMCs Accountable Domestic
Options
  • Litigation
  • Corporation - go after parent corporation based
    on negligence
  • corporations duty to care v. crime committed
  • Individual military or civilian courts
  • detecting violations
  • jurisdictional issues
  • evidentiary mountains to climb
  • political question doctrine
  • government contractor immunity
  • liability superior responsibility, JCE,
    complicity of CEOs

24
Holding PMCs Accountable Domestic
Options
  • Contracual Method forces the client to monitor
    and ensure compliance would this wipe out any
    efficiency gained through PMCs?
  • corporate structure duty to care
  • incorporate domestic laws into contracts
  • enforcement mechanisms judicial review?
  • reporting requirements
  • Institutional Change cultural, organizational,
    professional norms industry wide
  • licensing schemes that are not self-imposed
  • sanctioning for non-compliance
  • codes of conduct (force adoption of IPOA code)
    self-regulation
  • external independent monitor (ex ABA, AMA)

25
Montreaux Document 2008
  • 28 States support limited to armed conflict
    many do not apply those provisions already in
    place
  • ? Applicable Legal Obligations
  • State obligations remain and must apply IHL HRL
    (Hague, Geneva, Protocol I, UN Convtn)
  • PMCs must respect natl laws, IHL, HRL
  • notes superior liability of govt over PMCs
  • ? Best Practices
  • establishes criteria, procedure, terms of
    contracts
  • creation of monitoring authorizing mechanisms

26
A target at the end of the scope.
  • Definition (individuals acts) perform
    mercenary-like activities but fall outside the
    definition
  • profit motive irrelevant
  • nationality residencey irrelevant
  • accountability based definition
  • Political Will lack of it to limit
    mercenary-like activities
  • strong weak states acknowledge benefits of PMCs
    efforts to reduce are shams
  • Interl Law interl community advocates against
    mercenaries yet since Cold War practice has
    increased
  • Can Working Group overcome the UN beauracracy in
    a reasonable timeframe?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com