Symbolic Interactionism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Symbolic Interactionism

Description:

'Looking-glass self': self is composed of one's awareness of others' reaction to oneself. ... Contrary to Cooley's 'looking-glass self'. Individual agency: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1713
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ivan120
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Symbolic Interactionism


1
Symbolic Interactionism
2
Elements of social phenomena(Herbert Blumer)
  • Individuals are agents of social behaviour.
  • Social phenomena involve subjective meaning.
  • Individuals understand that their actions and
    actions of others have meaning.
  • Subjective meanings are arbitrary.
  • Meanings are not properties of objects or
    behaviour - they are socially constructed they
    arise out of reactions of others and are
    negotiated. Examples?
  • Meanings are situational. Examples?
  • Meanings are communicated by symbols.

3
Elements of social phenomena(Herbert Blumer)
  • Social phenomena are intersubjective.
  • A necessary condition of social interaction
    subjective meanings that constitute social
    phenomena are shared i.e. intersubjective.
  • Durkheim
  • Social phenomena consist of socially constructed
    realities.
  • Social relationships are both conditions and
    products of individual behaviour.
  • Example Negotiated definition of a situation
    (Emerson)

4
George Herbert Mead
  • Importance developed basic tenets of symbolic
    interactionism, based on and in reaction to
    pragmatism.
  • Pragmatism emphasis on practice.
  • Practice is the criterion of truth and morality.
    There is no absolute, ahistorical truth.
  • There is no transcendental self (spiritual or
    biological). Self is socially situated.
  • "Self" in social psychology a sense of socially
    created individual identity.

5
Charles Horton Cooley
  • Little distinction between "I", "me", "my" and
    "mine" - all are aspects of the self.
  • The self can be understood and verified by
    everyday observation.
  • "Looking-glass self self is composed of ones
    awareness of others reaction to oneself.
  • A passive self is shaped by an infinite number of
    social sources of identity.

6
G.H. Mead and C.H. Cooley - differences
  • Subjective aspect of the self (the "I)
  • Self is both the object (self-conscience, the
    "me") and the subject of cognition.
  • Contrary to Cooleys looking-glass self.
  • Individual agency
  • "People make their worlds in addition to finding
    them ".
  • The self is more than an internationalisation of
    components of social structure and culture.
  • Contrary to Cooleys looking-glass self.

7
G.H. Mead and C.H. Cooley - differences
  • Socialisation and individuation are two sides of
    the same process.
  • Individuation is possible only in society.
  • Social self a structured self that is more than
    the sum of attitudes and actions of others toward
    one.
  • Mind is also social, because language is central
    to its development.
  • Importance of language / symbolic communication
  • Gesture (Wundt) a part of an action that elicits
    response.
  • "Significant symbol" a vocal gesture which has
    the same meaning for the individual making it and
    for the individual responding to it.

8
Mead the social self
  • The self consists of the me and the I.
  • The me consists of internalized attitudes of
    others.
  • It is based on significant others and the
    generalized other.
  • Adults discriminate among others.
  • Generalized other is
  • a product of both generalization and
    differentiation and
  • a response of individuals consciousness to all
    the others one has learned about.

9
Mead the social self
  • the I is
  • unique to the individual
  • subjective perception of and an impulse to
    respond to the me
  • creative, spontaneous, unpredictable.
  • The I gives individuals a degree of control
    over the way they fulfil social roles.
  • Behaviour often involves negotiations between
    the I and the me.
  • Behaviour actuated by the me and the I
    appears the same.

10
Goffman the social self
  • Like Mead the self is more than just a
    reflection of others opinions of self.
  • Unlike Mead negotiation of meaning in social
    interaction is not free and unrestrained.
  • The self is contingent on circumstances and
    rituals of interaction.
  • Social interaction is patterned - not open for
    any definition and negotiation of meaning.
  • "The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life"

11
The self in social situations Social order
Patterns of social behaviour
  • Self establishes relations with other people as a
    result of negotiations
  • With other people and
  • With social structural constraints.
  • Structural constraints limit our negotiations
    with other people.
  • Structural constraints affect individuals
    primarily through their
  • Statuses (position in distribution of social
    resources relative to other individuals) and
  • Roles (norms of behaviour attached to statuses)

12
Four features of social interaction
  • We align our actions with others and with aspects
    of the social structure. This makes our actions
    social.
  • Symbols / meaning
  • We do not just do, we act, as actors do.
  • We have in mind meanings of our acts, including
    our beliefs about how our acts are perceived by
    others.
  • We take the role of other.
  • 3. We expect continuity of social behaviour.
  • Our actions are patterned by our statuses and
    groupings we belong to.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com