Wireless Link Adaptation for Deadline Constrained Traffic with Imperfect Channel Estimates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Wireless Link Adaptation for Deadline Constrained Traffic with Imperfect Channel Estimates

Description:

Mobile can adapt transmission power, modulation, and convolutional code ... We also proposed a means to adapt to channel estimation errors and delays ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: systemsS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wireless Link Adaptation for Deadline Constrained Traffic with Imperfect Channel Estimates


1
Wireless Link Adaptation for Deadline Constrained
Traffic with Imperfect Channel Estimates
Tim Holliday Depts of MSE and E.E. Stanford
University thollida_at_stanford.edu
Andrea Goldsmith Dept of E.E. Stanford
University andrea_at_ee.stanford.edu
Peter Glynn Dept of MSE Stanford
University glynn_at_stanford.edu
IEEE ICC 2002 New York, NY
2
The Problem
  • Streaming audio/video and other deadline
    constrained traffic require tight QoS constraints
  • Current Fixed-BER control policies consume far
    more power than necessary and reduce system
    capacity
  • Delayed and erroneous channel estimates can wreak
    havoc on the performance of Fixed-BER controls
  • High speed mobiles and urban propagation
    environments are a particularly bad combination

3
The Main Issues
  • How do you solve for optimal link adaptation
    policies for deadline constrained traffic?
  • Minimum power consumption subject to constraints
    on deadline expiration
  • How do channel characteristics and poor channel
    estimates affect the optimal control?
  • What types of QoS constraints accurately
    represent performance?
  • Is a simple constraint on probability of data
    loss sufficient? (Answer It depends on the
    channel)

4
A Solution
  • We propose a dynamic programming solution for
    optimal power and coding with deadline
    constrained traffic
  • Key advantages
  • Permits a great deal of flexibility and detail in
    our wireless channel models
  • Allows for a wide variety of performance
    constraints
  • Allows us to adapt to delayed/inaccurate channel
    estimates

5
System Model
  • Standard TDMA cellular structure (no intra-cell
    interference)
  • Single wireless mobile transmitting deadline
    sensitive data to a base station
  • All data generated at the mobile has a deadline
    by which is must be transmitted
  • Mobile can adapt transmission power, modulation,
    and convolutional code parameters to meet
    deadline requirements

6
Dynamic Programming Formulation
  • Construct a Markov chain model for a mobile
  • See the paper for details (Markov modulated
    traffic sources, traffic with multiple deadlines,
    etc.)
  • Each unique combination of power, modulation, and
    coding determines a different transition matrix
  • Objective of the DP is to choose the optimal
    transition matrix for each state of the mobile

7
Value Function and Transition Dynamics
  • Define a control policy g as a function that maps
    states into actions (i.e. a transition matrix)
  • Then define a value function and transition
    matrix (V(g) and P(g)) such that

8
Optimization and Constraints
  • We can optimize the value function through a
    simple linear program.
  • This structure also allows us to easily constrain
    various metrics like probability of deadline
    expiration

9
Imperfect Channel Estimates
  • Consider a simple two-state Markov chain channel
    model with transition matrix Q.
  • Suppose the estimates are uncertain and delayed
    by 5 timeslots. The best guess of the channel
    state is NOT the old estimate!

10
Numerical Example Setup
  • System is modeled after EDGE, see the paper for
    details on time slot structure, BLER plots, etc.
  • Mobile adaptation options
  • Transmission power range 20mW to 800mW
  • Choose between MCS-6 and MCS-9 (rate ½ and full
    rate 8PSK)
  • Traffic deadlines are 60ms or 3 time slots
  • Deadline constraint is 1

11
Channel Models
  • Consider two mobile speeds 3 km/h and 50 km/h
  • Two shadowing environments with mean path loss of
    120dB
  • Macrocell
  • Std. Dev. 7dB
  • Correlation.82 at 100 meters
  • Microcell
  • Std. Dev. 4.3dB
  • Correlation.3 at 20 meters
  • So we should expect estimate delay to have bigger
    impact in a 50 km/h microcell than a 3 km/h
    macrocell

12
Power Cost For A Fixed-BER Control
13
Power Cost For Dynamic Programming Solution
14
Example Control Policy
15
3 km/h
16
3 km/h
50 km/h
17
Power Cost With Consecutive Loss Constraint
18
Conclusion
  • We have presented a framework for finding optimal
    link adaptation policies for deadline constrained
    traffic
  • We also proposed a means to adapt to channel
    estimation errors and delays
  • Both the optimal control and the validity of the
    QoS constraints can be greatly affected by the
    channel model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com