Title: Contract Damages
1Contract Damages
- Expectancy
- Restitution
- Reliance
- LDCs
2Contract Damages
- Expectancy
- Restitution
- Reliance
3Expectancy (334)
- Goal of Contract Damages Give nonbreaching
party its expectancy interest i.e., put
nonbreaching party in as good a position as it
would have been in with performance. - Burden on plaintiff to prove
- _______ (causation of some) by preponderance
- ________ w/reasonable certainty.
- If plaintiff fails, other remedies may be
available. - If contract performance would have netted loss to
plaintiff, other remedies may be available. - If award of expectancy is economically wasteful
4What if
- Defendant agreed to build house that faced due
north instead, it is a mirror image and faces
south. - Rebuilding the house is cost prohibitive and the
houses value to another person is fine. - Should plaintiff get cost to perform to
expectation, or not? - What if plaintiff isnt going to re-build?
5Cost Rule Value Rule
- Plaintiff should be awarded amount to
repair/complete the work as promised. - Preferred rule because gives the nonbreaching
party benefit of bargain - But, if cost greatly disproportionate to benefit
conferred, then waste issues arise.
- Plaintiff should be awarded difference in value
between what was promised and what was delivered - Plaintiff often wont want because it allows
breaching party to deliver less than promised. - If minor problems, works well, but if what is
delivered is substantially different?
6Reliance
- General rule the nonbreaching party may recover
expenses made in essential reliance on breaching
party. - Exception.
- Goal make breaching party pay out-of-pocket
costs of nonbreaching party. - Measure plaintiffs out-of-pockets, not its
expected profits.
7Reliance - Gruber (341)
- Plaintiff sued when defendant failed to perform
contract for sale of xmas cards. - Plaintiff could not prove expectancy with
reasonable certainty due to NBR. So instead
sought reliance damages. - Defendant alleged that its breach saved the
plaintiff from losing money.
- Exception
- Defendant must prove _________________.
- If so, then ______________________________________
______________________
8Restitution
- Goal Put the breaching party in the position it
would have been in had it performed. - Take away unearned benefits.
- General rule where plaintiff confers benefit on
defendant, and it is unjust for defendant to
retain benefit, it can be disgorged. - How measured?...
9Restitution - Campbell (344)
- TVA agent without authority agrees to pay 30k
to Campbell for microfilming TVAs journals. TVA
sends film back after 2 months. Campbell
destroys original journals. When TVA refuses to
pay, Campbell sues in QM. - On appeal, TVA says it is obligated not to pay
for the film itself, but only for the benefit
or unjust enrichment, if any, which it received
by having the film in the library for 2 months.
- So, is it how much it would cost to acquire goods
on the market (Plaintiffs theory) or how much
benefit was received by having them? - Court uses plaintiffs measure because (1) no way
to prove benefit and (2) no market value of
unique goods.
10Liquidated Damages Clauses
11What is an LDC?
- What makes a clause that mentions or limits
damages an LDC?
- Whats an LDC typically say?
12Are any of these an LDC?
- If buyer breaches this agreement, he shall not
be responsible for any consequential damages. - If buyer breaches this agreement, he shall
forfeit his deposit as partial liquidated
damages.
- If buyer breaches this agreement, he shall pay
500 as liquidated damages. - If buyer breaches this agreement, he shall pay
no more than 500 as liquidated damages.
13Southeastern Land Fund (417)
- Facts?
- If buyer defaults seller shall be entitled to
retain 5k, to collect on the 45k note, and to
pursue any and all other remedies including
specific performance
- Why does the clause allowing for spec perf create
no problem? - Why do the other two clauses cause a problem?
- What should the drafter have done to have written
a good LDC?
14Every breach does not trigger award to
nonbreaching party of LD. Instead, it must be
a ______ breach.
15Whats so funny aboutFreedom of Contract?
- So long as theres no fraud, why should the law
care about bad bargains? Isnt that all an
invalid LDC is? - Is it any different than B agreeing to pay 20k
for a car that has a FMV of 5k?
16Efficient Breach Reason to Limit LDCs?
- Bob had promised to do work for Susie. Bobs
breach will cost Susie 12k, but would allow Bob
to earn 20k. Social efficiency is served if we
allow Bob to breach, pay Susie the 12k. So, and
LDC set at 25k is socially inefficient Bob is
forced to perform, costing society 8k. - But Posner in Lake River questions whether this
purpose is outweighed by the credibility LDCs
lend to performance. See 411-12.
17When can an LDC be Invalid at Common Law?
- Whether, at the time ______________________
- (1) damages resulting from a breach would be
________________________________, and - (2) the stipulated amount had a _________________
to the ____________________________ if a breach
occurred. - If the plaintiff incurs no actual damages
- If the amount specified is disproportionate to
actual damages - If it is invalid, its unenforceable as a
penalty.
18(1) Difficult to Determine
- The greater the difficulty either of proving
that loss has occurred or of establishing its
amount with the requisite certainty, the easier
it is to show that the amount fixed is
reasonable. - So, the harder it is to prove that a loss
happened or how much, the more likely it is that
the number the parties wrote down is right? Huh?
- If its difficult to determine damages, why on
earth do courts enforce contracts written by
fools for a specific amount by holding that the
amount they picked is reasonable?
19How do Courts Determine Whether its Difficult to
Determine Damages?
- Is it
- Viewed objectively or
- Subjectively?
- Whats got to be difficult about it?
- Breach could cause all sorts of harm?
- Proving causation is hard?
- Examples of whats not difficult
- Semico (408)
- Checkers (408)
20(2) Reasonable Estimate
- At common law, must it be reasonable compared
to - (A) Expected harm (ex ante)?
- (B) Actual harm (ex post)?
- Either (cualquiere)?
- Both (los dos)?
- (E) None of the above (nada)?
- Objectively or subjectively reasonable?
21Boyle v. Petrie (400)
- Wrongful discharge case by Boyle, who wants LDC
amount. - Where was Boyle before Petrie?
- How was the LDC negotiated?
- Whos Petrie Cos Daddy?
- How did he show that to Boyle?
- What did the LDC in Boyles employment contract
say Boyle should get? - Facts court relies on in upholding it
-
-
-
-
-
22Other evidence relevant to validity?
- Under the majority rule, is the parties
subjective intent controlling? Relevant? - Minority (Georgia) rule
- Why could that difference matter at trial?
- Under the majority rule, if contract says This
amount is reasonable estimate of possible
damages, and not penalty does/does not that the
control the inquiry? - Is the language entitled to any weight?
23Score sheet
- Valid
- Boyle
- DiNardo
- Truck Rent-A-Center
- In re Lion
- Invalid
- Semico
- Checkers
- Southpace
- Lake River
24In November
- Does the party challenging the clause have to
show its invalid or does the party relying on
it have to show its valid? - Who decides if LDC is valid?
- Florida, S.C. Georgia apparently a question of
fact. - Most other states a question of law for the
court.
25What if the LDC is invalid?
- Does the nonbreaching party get nothing?
26What if the LDC is valid?
- What is the impact on other remedies?
- General rule?
- Exceptions?
- What if the nonbreaching party loses 100 as a
result of the breach and the LDC is 100. Does
she get 200?
27Mitigation and LDCsBoyle (400) Musman (404)
- As a general principle, is there a duty to
mitigate damages? - Why is duty in quotes?
- Do monies earned in mitigation affect the amount
owed under an LDC? - Why does that make sense?
- Can a plaintiff ever get a portion of the LDC, as
such? - E.g.., if its the court holds that its a
penalty, can the court award the reasonable
part, or is the plaintiff relegated to proving up
damages?
28Exclusivity LDC and SpecPerf?
- S breaches, refusing to sell land to B. Contract
contains an LDC of 10,000 to B. Can B seek
specific performance? - General rule
- Exception
29In November.
- When you are drafting a contract for a client,
why would you include an LDC? - What are you trying to accomplish for your
client? - When would you not want to include one?
30In November
- Client comes to you with a breach of contract
case that includes an LDC. - Whats your investigation and discovery going to
include? - Suppose the LDC amount must be reasonable at the
time of contracting. - If the evidence shows the actuals were much
different, how would you get that evidence in? - What if actuals were similar to the LDC amount?
31In November
- Truck Rent-A-Center (405)
- Facts?
- Whats the lesson from the courts discussion of
the option clause? - What should the breaching party have done?
- Why was the clause upheld?