Radiological Protection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Radiological Protection

Description:

A general discussion on the history, ethics and basic science of radiological protection ... The profession is not arrogant enough to think that we will ever get them ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: pauline97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radiological Protection


1
Radiological Protection
The Society for Radiological Protection
  • Name of speaker

2
A general discussion on the history, ethics and
basic science of radiological protection

3
NOTE TO THE SPEAKER
  • Before using this presentation, please refer to
    the notes "Public Presentations - Standard
    Format" at http//www.srp-uk.org
  • Afterwards, please email the Society that you
    have used the presentation. We would like to know
    how it went, and would particularly like to have
    your modified version.
  • Issue 1 - April 2001

4
CONTENT
  • Introduction
  • What is radiation?
  • Demonstration
  • Background radiation
  • Effects of radiation
  • Setting limits
  • Benefits from the use of ionising radiation
  • Living with risks
  • Conclusion

5
INTRODUCTION
  • Me
  • The Society for Radiological Protection

6
Me
  • Who am I?
  • What's my job?
  • Why I do what I do.
  • Why I'm a radiological protection professional.
  • How I keep up to date with the profession, share
    experiences, learn from others.

7
The Society forRadiological Protection
  • Joining the club (learned society)
  • What's in it for me
  • access to independent forum on safety issues
  • access to the best brains in the business
  • access to international information
  • peer recognition as competent professional
    (certification scheme)

8
How?
  • Journal
  • web site
  • meetings
  • conferences

9
Why am I speaking to you?
  • Many people worried by radiation - confused by
    the contradictions (diagnostic x-rays
    good/radioactive waste bad).
  • We believe that to help workers, patients and the
    public deal safely and rationally with radiation,
    they should understand something about it.
  • SRP can do this independent of both the nuclear
    industry and anti-nuclear protest groups.

10
WHAT IS RADIATION?
11
The difference between...
  • non-ionising electromagnetic fields
  • optical radiation
  • ionising radiation

12
The electromagneticspectrum
  • visible / invisible - detect directly /
    indirectly.
  • Radio waves, microwaves, infra red, visible
    light, ultra violet, X-rays, gamma rays

13
X-ray generators

14
Ionisation
15
Radioactivity /Radioactive decay
16
Atomselementsisotopes

17
Particle radiation
  • Alpha
  • Beta
  • neutrons

18
Half-life
  • radioactivity disappears naturally

19
Natural radioactivity

20
DEMONSTRATION
  • End window Geiger or
  • dual phosphor scintillation probe
  • Cornish granite
  • potash fertiliser
  • Lo-salt
  • thorium coated gas mantle or welding rod
  • luminous watches (radium and tritium)
  • A small air sampler
  • radon daughters

21
BACKGROUNDRADIATION
  • Components
  • terrestrial (including radon)
  • cosmic
  • medical
  • man-made

22
A radioactive world
  • Humans and animals evolved in a radioactive
    world
  • We are all exposed to radiation and the human
    race always has been
  • Remember half-life

23
EFFECTSOF RADIATION
  • What radiation does and doesn't do
  • Cell damage and acute and chronic consequences

24
Effects of sunlight
  • Short-term local heating, sunburn
  • limit time of exposure
  • shield with sun creams
  • long term skin cancer
  • can't predict who will get it, but we find more
    cancers in people who have been exposed to the
    most sun (Australia)

25
Acute effects oflarge doses of ionising
radiation
  • radiation burns, organ damage
  • shielding
  • limit working times
  • protective clothing (tools of the trade)
  • internal / external contamination (dung heap
    analogy).

26
Long term effects
  • epidemiology and difficulties with statistics -
    impact of "normal" cancer levels and background
    radiation exposure
  • compare with skin cancer and sun

27
Dose
  • one unit (Sievert) has been derived to allow
    comparisons between the different effects of
    alpha, beta, gamma and whether exposure is to the
    whole body or to specific organs

28
SETTING LIMITS
  • Internationally agreed rules have evolved to
    protect workers and the public from the effects
    of radiation
  • Standards have changed with time
  • The profession is not arrogant enough to think
    that we will ever get them absolutely right - so
    continuous process of review.

29
Threefundamental principles
  • Keep radiation as low as reasonably practicable
    to minimise long term effects
  • Justify all exposure by considering the benefits
  • Keep all exposure within legal limits

30
Limits
  • set to prevent acute effects and to provide a
    legal backstop
  • just exceeding a limit is not a life or death
    matter but it does show that safety may not be
    given the right level of management priority

31
BENEFITSFROM THE USE OF IONISING RADIATION
  • Medicine
  • diagnostic x-rays
  • CAT scanners
  • tracers
  • cancer therapy

32
  • Industrial
  • large-scale electricity generation
  • marine propulsion
  • thickness detectors
  • level detectors
  • fire detectors
  • tracers
  • industrial radiography

33
  • Research
  • tracers in biological research, geology, carbon
    dating etc.

34
LIVINGWITH THE RISKS
  • System of radiological protection is there
    because society recognises that there is a risk

35
Living is a risky business
common annual risks of death
36
The radiological protection specialists' job is...
  • to minimise the risks from using radiation.

37
CONCLUSION
  • Radiological protection is about trust
  • Members of the Society who work for the big users
    of radiation do so in the knowledge that they and
    their employers have a legal responsibility not
    only for the safety of workers, but also the
    public who live around their factories, hospitals
    or power stations.

38
  • They achieve safety by gaining the trust of these
    people by an honest approach on the risks of
    radiation, discussing safety openly.
  • This is done with regular staff training, working
    with Trades Union appointed Safety
    representatives and regular meetings with
    representatives of the local community.

39
  • The ability to empathise with the full
    cross-section of society, from managing directors
    to shop stewards to concerned members of the
    public is a key quality of radiological
    protection specialists.

40
Legal framework ofprotection
  • Many Society members work for the Nuclear
    Installations Inspectorate the Environment
    Agency the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries
    and Food. (Or Scottish/Welsh equivalents).
  • These bodies enforce the various regulations
  • but also provide advice and can act as sounding
    boards when users are deciding how to approach a
    particular issue.

41
Independent advice...
  • to everyone in the business comes from the
    National Radiological Protection Board
  • a statutory body

42
People meet together
  • People from all these organisations and
    businesses meet together in the Society for
    Radiological Protection. Our Society provides a
    forum for radiation safety issues to be debated
    in a proper scientific manner.

43
Objective
  • Our members all share the same objective - that
    the benefits of working and living with radiation
    will always outweigh the risks.

44
www.srp-uk.org
The Society for Radiological Protection
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com